- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
ambivalent about the trade overall
however,
in terms of now and recent future, garza is huge because our pitching would be beyond awful without him
he has been our lead pitcher and very consistent unlike some of the other pitchers in our rotation
some of the prospects i wish we hadnt sent like fuld and lee(especially with their defense), but i think garza and some side gain is not a bad return
Because the Cubs dealt basic garbage for a 1-2 starter.Well, how can you say you won the deal when Garza pitches for a team that blows?
Well, how can you say you won the deal when Garza pitches for a team that blows?
Well that may be true but Garza is under .500 in his career for a reason.
Loved the trade then and I still do now
I never liked garza he just seems like a thug to me :dunno: I bet he stays though. I think we need to give him a year or two more to step up big time
do you hate like every cubs player because they are a "thug" or "have a bad attitude"?
lol@using a pitcher's record to directly determine their worth
that's like beyond cherry picking
if the cubs hadnt traded for garza they still would have blown
they traded some scraps and some good prospects not anyone that directly affected the team majorly(double meaning intended) in the 2011 season
if anything garza made the team better
LOL at him making the team better. Are you high?
And if he was so damn good then why did teams like Twins/Rays dump him quick?
They don't seem to miss the great Matt Garza.