- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 27,658
- Liked Posts:
- 10,434
Im wondering if the Wilson nuthuggers are alive or hanging in a closet somewhere?
So what your opinion is, and you stand by it, is Russell Wilson was more important to the Super Bowl win than the defense?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Anybody watching this game that still believes that the refs aren't employed to make the Packers win is stupid. These are the worst calls I've ever seen and they just continue game to game. Enjoy your Super Bowl Pack fans.
Imagine if a certain Bears QB was 1-8 with 3 INTs?
I don't know about that , but, if you're gonna let the handfighting and jersey pull go on the pick in the end zone, don't turn around and call PI on the guy on Nelson after Jordy tries to push off.
no, stop trying to put words in my mouth. i said that without him seattle doesn't win that super bowl just like without their defense they don't win that super bowl
I'm not putting words in your mouth. I asked you a question directly about leaning one way or another, and you replied Wilson and stand by that statement.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
Seattle comes out in the 2nd half, drives down the field and scores a TD. Goes on to win the game and the Packers/Rodgers shit the bed.
Im wondering if the Wilson nuthuggers are alive or hanging in a closet somewhere?
Point them out as they come for and against the Packers. You'll be surprised. Unless you are not honest.
What about the hands to the face that wasn't, that kept the Packers drive alive to score their only TD... This happens every game for the packers, calls like this that extend drives that aren't penalties but they are called anyways at key points to allow the Packers to win games. Yes these happen to other teams, but not on a weekly basis, maybe once or twice a season at most.
one game doesn't make or break a players career first off. second off, he has dominated a lot of the games great QB's in the playoffs past....his track record speaks volumes compared to this 1 game
No. One game doesn't. That's why in said it when they were winning as well. Did he dominate them, or did the defense?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
his numbers in the games they won have been very good yes
OK. Was he the reason, or was the defense the reason they won what they have?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
a combination of both obviously
Not just him. The first INT should've been a completion, and Baldwin did fumble a ko return, but he's part of it.