fenderpfunk
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,462
- Liked Posts:
- 3,063
Listen just fucking give it to me straight, is Cutler elite or not?
Most of the cunting from stuff like this won't be about Trubisky being ranked where he is, it will be because other young QBs got a more positive review, especially Watson and Garoppolo, the admiration of whom are CCS felonies.
Listen just fucking give it to me straight, is Cutler elite or not?
No more, I like Mahomes. Who had 1 start two Trubisky’s 17 starts? That La Canfora, am I right? I just Pooped to highlight he was already higher on than Trubisky. Higher on than Trubisky? WTF, I must be on shrooms. Please ignore this post and any and all of my posts moving forward.
I think you're really describing Sam Bradford here.Stafford is like marrying a hot chick you never get to bone. And she takes all your money.
And if you weren't a Bears fan, you'd take most of them over Trubisky. Own the meatball in you.Regardless of where he ranks Trubs, I would take Trubs over most them other QBs. He will be priming as the team is priming. Timing is everything.
No, more like Mahomes, who had 1 start to Trubisky’s 12 starts, that La Canfora made it a point to highlight he was already higher on than Trubisky.
But he didn't put Mahomes higher. He said he was tempted to, but he ended up with them both in the same unproven category. He did say that he sees a brighter future for Mahomes and that he's more uncertain of Trubisky's, and will need to see before he believes.
We can argue about whether this is reasonable or not, but you have to consider that Mahomes is going into a rock solid established system under one of the best and more experienced coaches in the league, while Trubisky is going into a complete unknown with a rookie head coach.
To me it looked like he said Mahomes has the more advantageous situation rather than proclaiming him the better player. If anything this should be a gift to the homer QB fanboys who now have another ready made excuse if Trubisky doesn't cut it.
I would take Mitch over Mahomes.
I would too. I'm not a fan of QBs whose best attributes are a huge arm.
Like Watson
I would take Mahomes. He has that inner warrior spirit.[video=youtube;Hr-UWQgyRB4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-UWQgyRB4[/video]
Talk about raw. I see many interceptions in Mahomes' future and lots of ups and downs.
I would take Mitch over Mahomes.
Memory of Jay still fresh on the mind but I recall you being a fan of the Gross man.I would too. I'm not a fan of QBs whose best attributes are a huge arm.
You are becoming a dopier caricature of an already cartoonish fool .I would take Mahomes. He has that inner warrior spirit.
I can see why KC did what they did to get Mahomes.
II can't see why the Bears did what they did to get Trubisky.
How is kirk cousins a proven winner?
Memory of Jay still fresh on the mind but I recall you being a fan of the Gross man.
Brett Favre admitted that he was in a drunken, vicodin haze when he won an MVP. Let's get Mitch hooked.
Mahomes is raw but situation is everything with QBs. He goes where he needed to go to be developed into an NFL franchise QB. Watson goes where he needed to go, a ready made playoff team in desperate need of a QB with a winning mentality and the skill to put them over the top. I can see why KC did what they did to get Mahomes. I can see why Houston did what they did to get Watson. I can't see why the Bears did what they did to get Trubisky.