His ceiling is a stud 3rd liner. I'm not saying that to disrespect him, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and I stress the word "stud" 3rd liner. Maybe he's on a second line on an unbelievably stacked team that has essentially a 2B line as their 3rd line. Like a Kopecky when he was here.
I agree, his trade value is sky high right now. I love the guy, but honestly, it'll sting a bit but I'd be okay if he's moved (assuming the return is right). It's like I said before: if you want a rebuild, you have to move pieces that will actually fetch you valuable rebuilding pieces. If you're just going to acquire 2nd and 3rd round picks, you're not going to rebuild.
It's reported that the asking price by the Hawks is extremely high for Hagel. I'm okay with that too. If Davidson doesn't get the asking price he's demanding, then you keep him. It'll hurt the rebuild, but it's preferable to moving him for anything less.
I agree. Hagel seems like the player who would indeed be a stud 3rd liner, but also has enough skill to play on the top-2 lines and not shoot the team in the foot. I also agree with the fact that the 'hawks should have specific pieces in mind for the rebuild, and if the offers for Hagel don't match what the 'hawks are asking for, we simply don't move him.
What I don't understand about moving Hagel is that he's the kind of guy a rebuilding team would want to have around, not to get rid of. He's young, talented, hard-working and affordable (at this point anyway). Of course he's a part of the minimal trade bait the Hawks have available but why move him for some unknown draft pick or prospect UNLESS there's an unbelievable deal offered? I just hope Davidson doesn't pull a Bowman type deal just for the sake of making a deal and/or some sort of news splash.
I believe I mentioned this in another thread, but wingers develop much quicker than centers, defensemen, and goalies. the 'hawks have what little strength they have in wingers: Kane, Debrincat, and Hagel. Their center depth is very lacking: Toews and Strome, and Toews is likely on the outtro of his career. Goaltending we have maybe Lankinen or Soderblom; neither of whom have shown that they are at least an average starter (yet), and the defense is a wasteland on-par with Pripyat.
Also, given the timeframe of the last 'hawks dynasty, it took 7-8 years between draft and domination for Seabrook and Keith. That reflected in Hagel's timeline puts him in his 30's where he would be commanding a pricetag on-par with his play and possibly on the downswing of his career.
However, if a team was willing to part with a can't miss D-prospect who would be a bonafied #1-2 D-man, that could help jumpstart the rebuild.
Hagel does a lot of things right, and if the 'hawks were in a position less 2006 and more 2008 or 2009 he would be a piece you absolutely want to keep. As it stands now, though, he's basically the right player at the wrong time. We shouldn't be giving him up for nothing and certainly not giving him up for project players like our ex-accountant did, but we should absolutely be entertaining offers for him and everyone that can get the right personnel we need in now. And if those offers don't drop? Keep him.