2024-2025 Bulls Season IGT

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
How's Caruso doing?
Way better than he was to start this year for sure. Biggest issue has been availability for him

1743171675576.png


Like some Bulls players, he has been a lot better since the break/deadline
1743171756570.png
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
With the Bulls' refusal to tank, they now find themselves 11th currently and the way things are going, they might actually win the play in this time (ironic given AK's statement of playoffs at the trade deadline seemed...laughable at best). They're actually still not that far out from falling back to 8th (and thus tripling their chances of a miracle jump into the top 4 or #1), but clearly they are one of the hottest teams outside the playoff picture currently.

1743173969726.png
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,035
Liked Posts:
36,310
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Way better than he was to start this year for sure. Biggest issue has been availability for him

View attachment 44610


Like some Bulls players, he has been a lot better since the break/deadline
View attachment 44611
19 MPG prior to the ASB. You have to assume, I'd think, that his numbers might be a little bit better with more minutes and more of the role he had with the Bulls. The Thunder simply don't need him that much. I'll be interested to see if that changes in the playoffs.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
19 MPG prior to the ASB. You have to assume, I'd think, that his numbers might be a little bit better with more minutes and more of the role he had with the Bulls. The Thunder simply don't need him that much. I'll be interested to see if that changes in the playoffs.
Imo a guy like Caruso, I probably should put his per 36 stats and advanced stats because those tell the better story of what he does. He's the kind of player that wouldn't wow you with his raw stats (except steals perhaps) and his shooting can be streaky and he's injured a lot.

On the defensive side of the ball, where I think OKC has him focused on, rather than the increased offensive load he carried last year with us, Caruso is as good as he's ever been I think.

1743192617560.png

1743192651442.png
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,035
Liked Posts:
36,310
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Imo a guy like Caruso, I probably should put his per 36 stats and advanced stats because those tell the better story of what he does. He's the kind of player that wouldn't wow you with his raw stats (except steals perhaps) and his shooting can be streaky and he's injured a lot.

On the defensive side of the ball, where I think OKC has him focused on, rather than the increased offensive load he carried last year with us, Caruso is as good as he's ever been I think.

View attachment 44620

View attachment 44621
Highest PER, and second highest usg% of his career.

I know it's fun to think in the moment, and we all have our bias, but depending on what the Thunder do this season the trade might be a wash.

That is not to suggest that there will be a loser in this trade, I"m just suggesting that it may very well be an even trade that works out for both.
 

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,672
Liked Posts:
14,581
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
Highest PER, and second highest usg% of his career.

I know it's fun to think in the moment, and we all have our bias, but depending on what the Thunder do this season the trade might be a wash.

That is not to suggest that there will be a loser in this trade, I"m just suggesting that it may very well be an even trade that works out for both.
100% a trade that has worked out for both sides already IMO

both sides got what they wanted

OKC got the veteran elite 3&D guy that is a great presence in the clubhouse

Bulls got a lot younger and got an extremely talented player that had become redundant for OKC


I remember Bulls fans complaining we didnt get a 2nd round pick back :LOL:
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,035
Liked Posts:
36,310
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
100% a trade that has worked out for both sides already IMO

both sides got what they wanted

OKC got the veteran elite 3&D guy that is a great presence in the clubhouse

Bulls got a lot younger and got an extremely talented player that had become redundant for OKC


I remember Bulls fans complaining we didnt get a 2nd round pick back :LOL:
It's quibbling, but if the Thunder don't make the finals then maybe you can say they lost? Maybe.

Again, that's a high bar for Caruso that I don't think many would set.
 

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,672
Liked Posts:
14,581
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
It's quibbling, but if the Thunder don't make the finals then maybe you can say they lost? Maybe.

Again, that's a high bar for Caruso that I don't think many would set.
i get that sentiment

i just think Caruso has helped put them in position to get to the finals. any team could manage to lose a series, hard to let that hold too much weight when evaluating the trade "winner/loser."

But, the Thunder certainly made the trade with making a finals run in mind. That is absolutely the bar that has been set
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Highest PER, and second highest usg% of his career.

I know it's fun to think in the moment, and we all have our bias, but depending on what the Thunder do this season the trade might be a wash.

That is not to suggest that there will be a loser in this trade, I"m just suggesting that it may very well be an even trade that works out for both.
Much of it will also do with how well Giddey plays next season and after too. For all we know, Giddey's just on a heater right now

But yes, as of now it's looking like both teams got what they wanted it looks like
 

zack54attack

Bears
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
18,860
Liked Posts:
7,465
Location:
Forest Park
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. North Carolina Tar Heels
What a game last night. That comeback was incredible. With LeBron involved on the 3 crucial plays. lol
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
What's interesting to me about this whole stretch of Bulls play since the trade deadline is that, right after the deadline, we were pretty convinced we could free fall into maybe the 6 or 7 spot if we played it right because we lost 5 in a row (probably more including games prior to deadline). This recent stretch where the Bulls have strung together 2 separate 4 game winning streaks has basically negated that prior losing streak and, as it happens Bulls are 1 game over .500 since the trade deadline (11-10).

I had kinda assumed that of those 11 wins, most would be against actively tanking teams...and a decent chunk are (Ws vs Philly, Toronto, Utah, Brooklyn, Miami arguably). But Bulls also have some solid wins against actively winning teams, especially lately (Lakers 2x, Denver *albeit no Jokic, Sacramento, Orlando). Couple bad losses to Indiana and Cleveland, some close losses to LAC, Phoenix, and Houston. That's basically Bulls basketball since February.

Hilariously, what this is setting the stage for is a final record that is not too far off of last year's. Bulls have a fairly cakewalk schedule the rest of the way. In theory, I can see them going 7-2 the rest of the way (losses to OKC and Cleveland). Bulls could actually conceivably win the play in so they can get their butts kicked by the Cavs in round 1.

What does one even take away from this seemingly Jekyll and Hyde stretch of the season?

For one I think it's funny that the Bulls finally run a seemingly normal sized rotation of players now, instead of 9 guards and Vuc/Smith. Injuries of course play a large factor there (Ayo out for the year, Tre Jones injured for a bit, Lonzo injured for a bit), but we do get to see the Bulls utilizing a bit of size at the wing sometimes between Matas, PWill, Phillips, and Terry. Phillips still doesn't get a ton of minutes, but Terry has gotten more burn of late and hasn't been a consistent trainwreck. THT has been out of the rotation after getting so much burn a couple months ago. Kevin Huerter is a bigger guard as well. Basically, it's not the all PGs lineup anymore, and I think that's a good thing.

On the Kevin Huerter note, I think we finally have actions in the offense that are intended to generate 3s on the move (stuff like pin downs, floppy, single double...for the nerds out there, though I don't think they run all that). I think that helps the offense work better rather than high screen and roll while everyone else stands around in the corner. The player movement in general is probably the best it's been in a long time.

Defensively, the effort has been a lot more present than it has been over the recent years as well. I'll give Giddey a lot of credit there, his defense to start the year was absolutely terrible, but now you can see mostly consistent effort. He's still not a great individual defender and probably never will be, but he's functioning within the overall team system. Huerter also usually gives pretty good effort, and Coby has as well. Vuc has looked more engaged defensively too. All poor individual defenders of course, but at least they're trying. If a team at least gives consistent effort on defense, you can at least work with that.

I think the following statements are true:

1) This stretch is probably worse for the Bulls overall. To move the needle of this franchise we need superstar, as well as Giddey and Coby have been playing, they are not that. That said, they've been very very very good in this stretch. Punching well above their value right now.

2) This stretch has probably been the most fun the Bulls have been since pre Lonzo injury. Goes to show how miserable the last 3 years have been. If you can watch them (because lol TV deal), they won't make you want to claw your eyes out. They're entertaining.

This creates the offseason dilemma of, do you trust that this is the way Giddey and Coby are going to perform going forward? How much they get paid in the next couple offseasons if entirely dependent on that. I still think the Bulls should commit to only one of them long term, for the purposes of acquiring some needle moving player at some point down the line. If you're paying 60M+ per year to these two, I just feel like it becomes that much harder to do so and we're back to where we were just a couple years ago.

All this to say...are the Bulls playing well right now? Yes. Is it all for naught because they're just spinning their wheels again? Perhaps.

At least with these guys, they're young enough to where you can have some hope for the future for improvement from them.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,035
Liked Posts:
36,310
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
It’s just the nature of the sport: one superstar can change the entire outlook of your franchise, and moreso than any of the other three. The problem is your best chance of getting those superstars is in the top of the lottery.* Of course it’s possible to develop a guy like Kawhi and get a legit MVP in the middle of the first, but that’s not a safe bet.

So yeah, would I prefer the Bulls to lose out and ensure a top lottery pick? Of course. Billy and the players have different thoughts though and theirs matter more. If they’re going to play well, play the way they’ve wanted to from the start of the season, and win games like last night, then cool. But it’s my second option.

I don’t see a problem in logic between wanting them to play well while wanting to see the future look better.

Just wish that I could view them on TV.


* I’m obviously excluding the draft and stash foreign players.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,740
Liked Posts:
7,441
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I can't remember the last time the Bulls made people go ballistic like this since Demar's back to back game winners...and I think the Internet reaction to this one has been bigger lol

 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
40,459
Liked Posts:
37,723
Location:
Cumming
What a game last night. That comeback was incredible. With LeBron involved on the 3 crucial plays. lol
Have we ever seen Jordan look like a bum like that? I guess you could make a case when Illini great Nick Anderson picked his pocket to secure a playoff win I believe. (Granted this was Jordan’s comeback tour in 95)

 
Last edited:

Top