4/1 - Predators (14-14-7) @ Blackhawks (26-5-3) 7:30PM CST

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
yah but i thought kopecky took a lot of draws. I could go look it up on NHL stats but im feeling lazy.

I'm too tired to care lol



Kopecky was 6th on the team in total faceoffs (31), 5th in faceoff wins (17), and 4th in faceoff percentage (54.8%). So no, he didn't really take that many face-offs, considering Madden took 200 more than him.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
i did it anyways. he didnt take a lot of draws at all I was way off. Madden did I forgot about Madden. He and Sharp were decent enough that year in the playoffs. Bolland was only 39% wow I dont remember it being that bad. Is it possible Bolland has actually improved since 2010 in the circle?



Nah, he was just remarkably worse during the playoffs that year than he ever was in his career.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,886
Liked Posts:
26,376
Ton why don't you recommend us a fancy centerman to get on Twitter so it can be an official rumor?



How about it fancypants?
 

bookjones

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
3,869
Liked Posts:
5
Location:
Uptown baby!
Ton why don't you recommend us a fancy centerman to get on Twitter so it can be an official rumor?



How about it fancypants?



#blackhawksgetvermette is the only centre hashtag that needs to be trending on the Twitterzzz!
 

Spunky Porkstacker

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 6, 2010
Posts:
15,741
Liked Posts:
7,308
Location:
NW Burbs
#crawfordcantseeeverything



This game should never have gone to OT.
 

winos5

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 19, 2013
Posts:
7,956
Liked Posts:
829
Location:
Wish You Were Here
Exactly. good thing Q had his secret weapon for shootouts ready. I mean did anyone really expect Rosival on the shoot out or for him to make such a slick deek and bury the the puck top shelf over a flailing pecker?
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,844
Liked Posts:
2,551
Exactly. good thing Q had his secret weapon for shootouts ready. I mean did anyone really expect Rosival on the shoot out or for him to make such a slick deek and bury the the puck top shelf over a flailing pecker?
I literally said to myself... oh shit, has he actually ever done this before? You'll notice the tv guys didn't even get graphics up for him.
 

Samurai

Ridiculum Anserini
Joined:
Dec 6, 2014
Posts:
1,865
Liked Posts:
872
Location:
Out Back Chopping Trees
I literally said to myself... oh shit, has he actually ever done this before? You'll notice the tv guys didn't even get graphics up for him.

0 for 0 isn't part of the graphics package. It's $129.99 extra. They said...Meh.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,678
Liked Posts:
3,047
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Shouldn't have gone to O/T. based on the recap/radio feed, 1st goal we allowed was indeed weaksause. 2nd one was courtesy of a Keith turnover and the obligatory 3rd period defensive meltdown and ensuing chinese firedrill in our own end.



Based on the results of the game: Survey says....Good enough.



Whenever one of our goalies bobbles a puck, plays out of position, whenever a defender coughs it up at our blueline or makes a no-look Pass to Nowhere, aand/or whenever a FWD tries to skate across the opposing blueline through twice their weight in defenders, could we please let them sit an hour in a hot tub filled with pigshit heated to 100 degrees?
 

Ashor-redtribe

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
1,654
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Schaumburg
Once again, I will say, this is another game to display why I like and think we play better away then we do at home.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
1st one was very weak, sure, first time all year he's let in a goal that everyone can agree was a peeshit... but he made some pretty good saves anyway so it evens out in my mind, plus bailed the Hawks out in the shootout. He had a stat line pretty similar to what he has done all year: 0.926 sv% and GAA just under 2.00.



The 2nd one, it is what it is... 2-on-1, Crawford took the shooter, Hornqvist (a Sharp-like sniper) passed it, Keith missed it, Crawford tried to make the desperation save, Beck shot, Corey got a piece and it rolled in. Tough luck, but I wouldn't call it "weak" at all. The defense left him out to dry 4-5 times in the first 7 minutes of that 3rd period, I believe they had 10 shots or something in that first 7 minutes.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Well Crawford had to get some work in...



The Hawks completely dominated the first 40min...Craw may have fallen asleep, hence the first goal....as well as spotting him a touchdown in DET on sunday
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Well Crawford had to get some work in...



The Hawks completely dominated the first 40min...Craw may have fallen asleep, hence the first goal....as well as spotting him a touchdown in DET on sunday



He still made 33 saves against Detroit on 34 shots... while the Blackhawks "peppered" Detroit with 26 shots, and their goalies only made 19 saves combined.



I guess he needs to have a shutout every game for people to be happy.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Shut out? no...just don't let goals in that weren't even shots on goal
 

Top