4-3 D

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined:
Feb 25, 2020
Posts:
99
Liked Posts:
35
I pick people’s noses for a living, so I’m technically a gold digger, not a ditch digger.
Hey shnozz picker....I haven't heard one reason why not a 4-3 from any of you idiots...not one...because there isn't any...another disappointing forum full of fools. Hey why don't you morons take some classes and TRY to make something out of yourselves instead of spreading your STUPIDITY all over the place. Get a life LOSERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DC
Joined:
Feb 25, 2020
Posts:
99
Liked Posts:
35
I kinda like this dude he is angry af most likely young thats just the life bubbling up inside him

Once his balls drop he will calm down prolly become a bank teller or something
I know a homo like you would like me....what is prolly??? HA...IDIOT!!!!!!!
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,238
Liked Posts:
7,028
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Hey shnozz picker....I haven't heard one reason why not a 4-3 from any of you idiots...not one...because there isn't any...another disappointing forum full of fools. Hey why don't you morons take some classes and TRY to make something out of yourselves instead of spreading your STUPIDITY all over the place. Get a life LOSERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you realize how many classes I had to take to become a gold digger?
 

greg23

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
9,632
Liked Posts:
5,373
4-3?

We have a deep DL and weak LB corp

6-1 is the way to go....duh.
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,060
Liked Posts:
9,498
oh look, another alt. troll

take you and FozzyBear and get the fuck out
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DC

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
4,704
Liked Posts:
3,732
The idea hit me last season with the extreme disappointment in R. Quinn. He sucks as an OLB, he can't cover anybody, and had 2 sacks. His TRUE position is DE in a 4-3. Then I thought the same about K. Mack. His best years were with the Raiders sack wise as a DE in a 4-3. I think his all balls out, super hustle, bull rush style of play is more suited for DE. Look at the DTs, Akiem and Goldman...wow...talk about possibly the best. So talk about the system matching the personnel. There is plenty of depth behind these guys too....Edwards, Bilal, and the new guys. The linebackers aren't as easy but MLB is Roquan with Trevathon and Ogletree on the outside. Plenty of depth too. Or, why don't they play both 4-3 and 3-4. Anyway that front seven looks good on paper, especially the d line....wondering how it would play out.
You do understand that the Bears are in there 3-4 base under 25% of the time. Otherwise they were in a 4-2-5 nickel which used Mack and Quinn as DE's.
 

pinkfloydster

Active member
Joined:
Aug 31, 2013
Posts:
724
Liked Posts:
571
The idea hit me last season with the extreme disappointment in R. Quinn. He sucks as an OLB, he can't cover anybody, and had 2 sacks. His TRUE position is DE in a 4-3. Then I thought the same about K. Mack. His best years were with the Raiders sack wise as a DE in a 4-3. I think his all balls out, super hustle, bull rush style of play is more suited for DE. Look at the DTs, Akiem and Goldman...wow...talk about possibly the best. So talk about the system matching the personnel. There is plenty of depth behind these guys too....Edwards, Bilal, and the new guys. The linebackers aren't as easy but MLB is Roquan with Trevathon and Ogletree on the outside. Plenty of depth too. Or, why don't they play both 4-3 and 3-4. Anyway that front seven looks good on paper, especially the d line....wondering how it would play out.

The above link may help clarify. Don't listen to these clowns. It's a valid question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top