mattb78
My threads are FTO !
- Joined:
- Sep 18, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,927
- Liked Posts:
- 4,389
- Location:
- Orlando
Pellisero was just on NFL network at lunch, said he thought it was Jones at #3, but heard SF was still in contact with Lance after the 2nd pro day practice, but if he had to bet it was Jones at #3. No mention of Fields.
Thought #4 was definitely Pitts. Too much game changing talent to pass on.
Also said that general consensus among GMs was this was a weaker draft in terms of top tier talent, only 16-18 true first rounders, opposed to usually 22-25. Better depth at CB and T, weaker at S, NT and DL. Said latter end of first could be a little wild because that is where some of the "safer" but less valued positions can usually go (NT, S) but the draft is weak in that "safe" area so its anyone's call.
FWIW.
Thought #4 was definitely Pitts. Too much game changing talent to pass on.
Also said that general consensus among GMs was this was a weaker draft in terms of top tier talent, only 16-18 true first rounders, opposed to usually 22-25. Better depth at CB and T, weaker at S, NT and DL. Said latter end of first could be a little wild because that is where some of the "safer" but less valued positions can usually go (NT, S) but the draft is weak in that "safe" area so its anyone's call.
FWIW.
Last edited: