53 man roster breakdown

DanielCCSBears

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 7, 2022
Posts:
4,889
Liked Posts:
1,577
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
The Bears once again need a lot of help and possibly half the 53 man roster could be turned over just to be competitive.

QB position is fine for now. Hopefully Tyson can develop into that long-term backup.

RB maybe add one player here.

WR Three receivers are needed Allen and Scott will be on their way out. Scott has been a complete bust as a draft pick. Need to add some competitive depth here to compliment two good players one star and a developing first round pick. Any injury here could be devastating.

TE Kmet is the floor level of TE I want around here for the rest of the existence of the Bears franchise. Yeah if they find greatness that would be fine. But if it never gets any better or any worse than him that's fine with me. Yet another Pace draft pick that looks way better than any Poles draft pick. Are we going to have to wait for seven years for Poles to figure out how to be a good GM? They need two additional depth pieces here.

OL is a frigging mess. They need three new starters minimally and probably 5 new depth pieces. Jenkins may or may not return. Probably draft a starting left tackle and then hope Kiran and Jones can be two depth pieces but Jones is going to need extended after 2025 most likely so they may need to find his depth replacement soon.

Defensive line isn't in much better shape than the offensive line.

Sure fine get by with Dexter, but will Billings be the same? Sweat is becoming what Walker should be, they're in need of an above average pass rusher.

They'll probably need depth at all 4 spots as well. Cowart and Booker may lessen that somewhat. I think you could flex to a 3-4 with Billings and Dexter manning the zero and 5 technique spots. Booker may be a situational pass rusher in that alignment.

The level of competent depth needed here may be at an all time high.

Linebacker, Edmunds eventual replacement and probably a depth piece.

The secondary needs probably two safeties one immediately if Brisker can't bounce back and Byard's eventual replacement.

Corners are probably settled for a while with hope that with some guidance and leadership Stevenson can reach his full potential.

Overall I can't make the case that Ryan Poles should be retained given the numerous mid round misses and the lack of depth coming from the UDFA market.

I believe it's an average of 30 percent of NFL rosters are made up from the UDFA pool of players and the Bears have two significant players from there in Sanborn and Bagent with no real promising developmental depth pieces in place.

Somehow they think that Ryan Poles has this team in the right direction. 🤣
 

baselman1974

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 26, 2014
Posts:
3,441
Liked Posts:
3,605
Location:
Palos Hills, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
Scott I give him benefit of doubt due to shitty coaching. Getsy and Waldron were horrible
 

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie
Joined:
Apr 25, 2014
Posts:
11,062
Liked Posts:
11,179
Location:
Tennessee
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nashville Predators
  1. ETSU Buccaneers
  2. Tennessee Volunteers
Edumunds eventual replacement? He’s 26 on a long term contract lol
 

DanielCCSBears

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 7, 2022
Posts:
4,889
Liked Posts:
1,577
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Edumunds eventual replacement? He’s 26 on a long term contract lol
He signed a 4 year deal, he'll be in year 3 next year. If you draft his replacement he mentors him for one year and then you can cut him. Since his impact has been minimal in comparison to his contract value why should they keep him for the final year of his 4 year contract?

Better yet do you think he'll be extended?
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,127
Liked Posts:
9,540
Is anyone reading this? I’m not trying to be rude.
"The Bears once again..."

^ I stopped there and immediately started reading other people's comments (like yours, I find it more valuable than the usual pipedream theoretical shit)
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
18,886
Liked Posts:
17,333
Location:
MICHIGAN
Don’t need to read thread to believe poles sucks. A gm that doesn’t prioritize ol dl is destined to fail.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
25,905
Liked Posts:
21,008
Is anyone reading this? I’m not trying to be rude.


At this point I assume no one is reading daniels posts and just insulting him. TBH idk why we started reading his shit anyways since he's been a clown for a decade+ on here.


Why get rid of Scott?

He still has 2 years on a rookie contract.

I wish we could get rid of daniel. Maybe the lions message boards are hiring a shitty writer.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
35,324
Liked Posts:
10,953
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
The Bears once again need a lot of help and possibly half the 53 man roster could be turned over just to be competitive.

QB position is fine for now. Hopefully Tyson can develop into that long-term backup.

RB maybe add one player here.

WR Three receivers are needed Allen and Scott will be on their way out. Scott has been a complete bust as a draft pick. Need to add some competitive depth here to compliment two good players one star and a developing first round pick. Any injury here could be devastating.

TE Kmet is the floor level of TE I want around here for the rest of the existence of the Bears franchise. Yeah if they find greatness that would be fine. But if it never gets any better or any worse than him that's fine with me. Yet another Pace draft pick that looks way better than any Poles draft pick. Are we going to have to wait for seven years for Poles to figure out how to be a good GM? They need two additional depth pieces here.

OL is a frigging mess. They need three new starters minimally and probably 5 new depth pieces. Jenkins may or may not return. Probably draft a starting left tackle and then hope Kiran and Jones can be two depth pieces but Jones is going to need extended after 2025 most likely so they may need to find his depth replacement soon.

Defensive line isn't in much better shape than the offensive line.

Sure fine get by with Dexter, but will Billings be the same? Sweat is becoming what Walker should be, they're in need of an above average pass rusher.

They'll probably need depth at all 4 spots as well. Cowart and Booker may lessen that somewhat. I think you could flex to a 3-4 with Billings and Dexter manning the zero and 5 technique spots. Booker may be a situational pass rusher in that alignment.

The level of competent depth needed here may be at an all time high.

Linebacker, Edmunds eventual replacement and probably a depth piece.

The secondary needs probably two safeties one immediately if Brisker can't bounce back and Byard's eventual replacement.

Corners are probably settled for a while with hope that with some guidance and leadership Stevenson can reach his full potential.

Overall I can't make the case that Ryan Poles should be retained given the numerous mid round misses and the lack of depth coming from the UDFA market.

I believe it's an average of 30 percent of NFL rosters are made up from the UDFA pool of players and the Bears have two significant players from there in Sanborn and Bagent with no real promising developmental depth pieces in place.

Somehow they think that Ryan Poles has this team in the right direction. 🤣
200w.webp
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
35,324
Liked Posts:
10,953
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Edumunds eventual replacement? He’s 26 on a long term contract lol
He signed a 4 year $72 mil contract with $50 mil guaranteed. So we're probably stuck with him for next year and then we can cut his ass.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
25,905
Liked Posts:
21,008

I read one sentence and it was about cole kmet.

Shows how dumb this fucking guy is. Cole Kmet has been great this year until waldron stopped using him after the bye. If we had a non idiot OC he would be a pro bowler right now.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
25,905
Liked Posts:
21,008
He signed a 4 year $72 mil contract with $50 mil guaranteed. So we're probably stuck with him for next year and then we can cut his ass.

He's not going anywhere.

This is as bad as jurkos segment on espn 1000 today saying the bears have 5m in cap space and they need to cut braxton jones cause he's making 6m when he's on a rookie deal.

The same moron daniel made a thread saying to trade jaylon johnson when he has a giant guaranteed cap hit.

Mods really gotta start restricting certain posters abilities to start threads. By certain posters I mean mostly Double Chin Dan
 

Top