You must have missed this part.
I think Dallas Buyers Club falls into the category of an Art House Film.
I typed "B-movie definition" into google and copied the first few links. I'm no expert, but the experts seem to agree with me, not so much with you. B-movies are low budget, non art house films. I understand that you don't like it, but as a fellow Bears fan I know you can handle this minor setback.
Keep slugging.
First, as long as you admit that you had to look it up, and that you aren't an expert. Because that is the real truth in your post.
I didn't say it was a B-Movie. I was implying under your definition, it could be. The definition that says, "not definitely" an arthouse movie. It doesn't say, "definitely not" an arhouse movie. Which is correct, not all arthouse movies are b-movies. But from the criteria given, 80s b-movie, most were. So even if something like Dallas Buyers Club did fall into an arthouse category, it's still low-budget, which, according to your continued, but failed, efforts, it's a B-Movie.
Here, you want a B-movie. Comedy from the same year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_'n'_Roll_High_School
Oh wait. $200k budget. Whoa.. I know it's no $1.6 million(which is
not a low budget for a film of its criteria), but maybe you get the idea. Or you can go along with this idea that if enough people repeat the wrong thing enough, and others start to repeat the same wrong information, you can too, and that is just okay.
But hey, if 1.6m in 1979 dollars are suddenly low budget, Why not extend that to $4m?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jerk. It's certainly not the $10m budget seen in action movies. So I guess that makes it a good comparison. /sarcasm
a) $1.6m is not a low budget.
b) Meatballs is
not a b-movie
c) B-Movies are films produced or selected for the purpose of double features/double bills. If you ignore the purpose, then you ignore the definition.
d) B-movies are made on a low budget.
e) all of the above *correct answer*
