[A] Player Evaluation: Brent Seabrook

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
You need someone to play the point on the power play? Need someone to block shots on the penalty kill? How about someone to shutdown the other team’s top line or get dirty in the corners? Brent Seabrook will do that for you, and then some. It’s no surprise to see a ton of Seabrook jerseys around the UC on game nights, and that’s because even the casual hockey fan can see all the things Seabrook does for the team.



Last season saw a bit of a dip in Seabs’s production (from 48 points to 34) but he went from having an even plus/minus to being plus 21 on a Hawks team that was probably the worst defensively they’ve had in a long time. But, it’s the stats that don’t seem to come up on your typical score sheet that Seabs usually leads the Hawks in. Seabrook led the Hawks in hits (198) while almost tripling the total of the next highest skater (Nick Leddy with 67…wtf?). Seabs also led the team in blocked shots (165) and was on the ice most for defensemen short-handed. The fact that he only missed 4 games all year is amazing considering the physical toll he put his body through.



While not having the lightest skates in the league, Seabs has been able to overcome this with great positioning. His shot is quite hard and accurate, and he’s quite sneaky at pinching from the blue line to the low slot for a shot on goal in the offensive zone. Like everyone else, he makes mistakes occasionally and turns the puck over, but the positive plays outweigh the negative by a large margin. He reads the play well and makes good first passes on the breakout that gets the Hawks moving in the transition. Seabs doesn't shy away from physical play, and usually initiates it in his own zone. He's willing to drop the mitts and stand up for a teammate when the situation arises. With his team first attitude and his willingness to give his best every night, it's not too difficult to see why he's one of the Hawks alternate captains and leaders.



So what can you expect in 2012-2013 from Seabrook? Pretty much the norm is what you want. The Hawks need that physical presence on the back end that he’s been providing for a long time. And even though the Hawks signed Sheldon Brookbank this past off season to bring some toughness on the blue line, he won’t be on the ice nearly as much as Seabs to have as much of an effect. Offensively I don’t see Seabrook tearing the league up as he’s not that type of player. Defensively I expect the same type of output he’s been giving and being the main cog on defense for the Hawks.



Prediction: 78 games / 9 goals / 28 assists / 37 points / Plus 25



-Trev



If you like what you have read or have any comments/concerns feel free to drop me a line in the comment section, or follow me on Twitter @The_Trevmeister.



Click here to view the article
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,927
Liked Posts:
26,406
Nope...



Seabrook finally gets 10 goals for the first time in his career, he's scored 9 goals in 3 separate seasons.



12G 43A



"Breakout" offensive year for him.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
I wouldn't exactly trumpet anyone on this team as good at playing the point on the powerplay....



I'll give him 11 and 31, Plus 25
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
He's got a good heavy shot and can move the puck around. Plus he's a defenseman and not a forward. What else do you want?



Bobby Orr?
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
What's to back up... They sucked at the powerplay all season. And that includes Seabrook. And you backed it up with... but he hits the puck hard and can move the puck around... oh and he's a defenseman... big fucking deal. I want an acutal QB back there is all, not a guy with some qualities that could translate. Is he better than others on the team, sure that's not saying much though... and leading off a story with it. Just insane. You can't define him by it. No way. Then you back up your story by saying, what do you want Bobby Orr, so yes, I gave you just as much of an asinine response.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
I'd say your right on the money or close to it, Ton..... especially factoring the new PP coach.... yeah....
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
Are you in the right thread wolfie? or just have drunk and don't know who's speaking... haha
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
LOL Mass..... It will be the same kind of result as last year and I won't be surprised if it is, just like you said.



I'm not drunk.... just responding to the article is all.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
What's to back up... They sucked at the powerplay all season. And that includes Seabrook. And you backed it up with... but he hits the puck hard and can move the puck around... oh and he's a defenseman... big fucking deal. I want an acutal QB back there is all, not a guy with some qualities that could translate. Is he better than others on the team, sure that's not saying much though... and leading off a story with it. Just insane. You can't define him by it. No way. Then you back up your story by saying, what do you want Bobby Orr, so yes, I gave you just as much of an asinine response.

That was an asinine response because I never said Seabs is a PP QB. I said hes good on the point (left point to be exact). His heavy shot as a righty is great. Plus he can move the puck and doesn't take forever to pass it. He makes decisions quicklh essentially. Plus, with him being a defenseman, if the PK gets the puck going tbe other way, Seabs knows how to actually play D compared to if Kane or Hossa were up there.



Also, I didn't start the article that way. The opening was actually cutoff in the forum version
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
LOL Mass..... It will be the same kind of result as last year and I won't be surprised if it is, just like you said.



I'm not drunk.... just responding to the article is all.
I think you need to check again as to who wrote it..
<
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
I was actually defining him as a great all around defenseman.
Ahhh for some reason I read point as QB... my bad. And I didn't realize that the article was cut off. That changes things slightly, I would say he's a great overall defense man and better than most that we have on the powerplay. But overall the PP has been so bad that it's really hard to tell. My only real comment was that it looked like you started the article like that, and with all the qualities he has, I think his ability on the power play wouldn't be the lead statement is all. It's not a bad piece at all, that's not what I was saying, I just focused on the PP part because that's where it started and I'm still venting on that front I guess.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Ahhh for some reason I read point as QB... my bad. And I didn't realize that the article was cut off. That changes things slightly, I would say he's a great overall defense man and better than most that we have on the powerplay. But overall the PP has been so bad that it's really hard to tell. My only real comment was that it looked like you started the article like that, and with all the qualities he has, I think his ability on the power play wouldn't be the lead statement is all. It's not a bad piece at all, that's not what I was saying, I just focused on the PP part because that's where it started and I'm still venting on that front I guess.

No worries, I assumed that's what happened so I kept out all the name calling and such.



No doubt the PP needs work, but imo its somewhat solve able.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
No worries, I assumed that's what happened so I kept out all the name calling and such.



No doubt the PP needs work, but imo its somewhat solve able.
Fire the right coach? haha
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
That could be am answer. An easier answer imo is the Hawks need to move the puck more around the offensive zone. Kane holding the puck on the half boards and then trying to force the puck through 4 guys to a wingers back door isn't going to work. The Hawks need to move it around and try and catch a PKer out of position. Hawks don't do that but instead force passes that aren't there.



Thats the less complex version.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
I agree....





Oh and on your earlier note, you did start the name calling, you called me a Supra, and I take high offense to that. hah.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
According to Quality of Competition, Seabrook has consistently been in the top 3-5 in the league for defenseman (#2 last year & year prior) the past few years or so compared to defenseman that have played over 50 games. Meanwhile Duncan has been in the top 15-25 range which is still impressive but the fact that Seabrook can play against the MOST QUALITY of competition night in and night out and still be so effective is what makes him incredible. Keith struggles from time to time, which is understandable but you rarely ever see Seabrook play a bad game or even have a bad shift. Chara, Phaneuf, Girardi, Lidstrom, Gleason, Weber, Robidas are generally among the names within the top 15-20 -- which has nothing to do with how "good" they are, just means they have a harder job to do against harder competition.



Outside of Toews, I would never trade Seabrook. IMO those two are both a true sense of "untouchable" on this team and without a doubt the two most important players that Chicago needs to win.
 

Top