[A] Vets Sleep, Youth Steps Up: CHI 4, PHI 5

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Too little to late for the Blackhawks tonight, unable to complete the comeback in a high octane contest between the two Stanley Cup finalists of only two years ago. Unfortunately in this round the Blackhawks could not handle the roller coaster in Philadelphia. The high-flying Flyers pelted Ray Emery with 46 shots while the Blackhawks mustered 34 of their own on Ilya Bryzgalov.



Early in the first period the Blackhawks capitalized in transition with Mayers feeding a hard pass to Hayes, who redirected the shot past Ilya Bryzgalov for his 2nd goal of the year.



On the ensuing face-off Andrew Shaw, in his 2nd shift of his 1st NHL game, dropped the mitts with Zac Rinaldo but the boxing match was not favorable for Shaw. Shaw landed the first few punches but Rinaldo connected with a blow right above Shaws eye which busted open and forced him to get repairs. Although I have no issues with fighting, in this case it was completely unnecessary and untimely considering the Blackhawks had just scored a goal and took the momentum anyway. Nice to see his willingness to fight but use it in aid of a teammate, not for a staged show.



The rest of the period was dominated by the Flyers who eventually netted the equalizer from a carom off the boards. The Blackhawks were able to gain a few more chances in transition, but could not reach the back of the net.



The Blackhawks came out in the 2nd period and dominated the first half with Andrew Shaw eventually fooling a defenseman and slipping a backhand shot past Bryzgalov for his first NHL goal. The lead didn't last long with the Flyers battling back twice as hard. Only 17 seconds later Scott Hartnell batted the puck past Emery and in a flurry Zolnierczyk and van Riemsdyk put the Flyers ahead 4-2.



Despite allowing 4 goals in the first two periods, Emery was very solid considering he was peppered with 34 shots which included several key saves.



In the final frame both teams ramped up their physical play but it almost proved costly for the Blackhawks with Patrick Sharp committing a 4-minute penalty due to an errant high-stick. Fortunately, the penalty-kill was magical to not only kill the penalty but allow Brent Seabrook to convert for a short-handed marker. Merely seconds later the Blackhawks struck again with Patrick Sharp feeding Kane to snipe a shot in the left corner to tie the game.



With a minute and a half left in the 3rd period, the Blackhawks committed another high-sticking penalty with Kane heading to the box. The Blackhawks could not come up with the answer this time as van Riemsdyk potted his 2nd goal of the game which would turn up as the game-winner.



ROOKIE ROULETTE



Jimmy Hayes continued to make his case for a roster spot by scoring his 2nd goal of the year. He was a huge factor in creating many offensive opportunities in the first two periods of the game as well as getting involved physically and owning the Flyers crease in net presence.



Andrew Shaw also had an impressive showing with his own share of opportunities. Grabbing his 1st NHL goal along with a fight (perhaps one he would like to forget) almost allowed him to post a Gordie Howe Hat Trick in his 1st NHL game. Great start to his career and has shown good potential for the future.



Dylan Olsen had a quiet game compared to the other two rookies but still another rookie with a solid showing being able to show his willingness to get involved physically and jump in the play offensively. For a young kid, he played the front of the net fairly well and had no problem tying up forwards and taking the body.



BLACKHAWKS THREE STARS OF THE GAME



1. Andrew Shaw

2. Jimmy Hayes

3. Ray Emery



Click here to view the article
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Phil got 6min PP time the last 10 min of the game. In a game where there was 1 minor - puck over the glass (a non-judgement call) - the first 50min.
 

JOVE23

New member
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
2,458
Liked Posts:
0
HEY REFS



look_my_fucking_balls.jpg
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
I dont want to talk about it. Threw away a point in my opinion and I wont be swayed on it.



Moving on to tomorrow which will be a tough game. Avs seem to give our guys a good tough game.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Pretty dumb to take a high-sticking penalty in with less then 2 minutes to go in a tie game.



Hawks again can't play defense in their own zone properly. Of all people Hossa let that 4th goal walk right by him.



The idea of Kane playing center should be donzo. He's not reliable in his own zone and he's better off on the wing with Toews. It had it's moment, but the Hawks need a 2nd line center and unfortunately, Kane is not the answer.
 

BiscuitintheBasket

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,802
Liked Posts:
0
Not to mention if you watch Sharps 4 minute minor he is being hauled down by Hartnell which is why there was a high stick.



Sharp was smacked right in the face with a stick, right in front of the ref he screamed play on.



The flyers are the most penalized team in the NHL. They have not gone a game all year without drawing a penalty. And tonight, not fucking ONE? And then after putting your whistles away ALL GAME for the most part you all that bullshit.



Un fucking real





Perhaps Torts was right....





And yea, in real time it is pretty obvious that Sharp was pulled down which caused his high sticking penalty...



Oh well, on to tomorrow night.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,959
Liked Posts:
26,449
Perhaps Torts was right....





And yea, in real time it is pretty obvious that Sharp was pulled down which caused his high sticking penalty...



Oh well, on to tomorrow night.



He was right in the WC and he would be right tonight... the officiating was "disgusting". I can't believe you get a 30K fine for speaking the truth.... fuckin fascist retards.



BUT



Great teams overcome bad officiating.
 

R K

Guest
Not usually in the last two minutes they don't. What a fucking shitty way to end the game. NHL should be ashamed of themselves.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Only saw last half:



Liked Shaw, Hayes and Olsen tonight. Thought they all played well.



Kane should not be a center anymore. He's not responsible enough defensively to play the position. He needs to get back on the wing with Toews and start putting the puck in more. IMO it's hurting him more then it's helping the team.



Can't take penalties in the final minutes of a tie game.



Emery played well considering how many shots he had on him.



Can we be done with Bickell already? He brings no value to this team whatsoever and I'd rather see Hayes play his spot considering he uses his size correctly.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,959
Liked Posts:
26,449
Only saw last half:



Liked Shaw, Hayes and Olsen tonight. Thought they all played well.



Kane should not be a center anymore. He's not responsible enough defensively to play the position. He needs to get back on the wing with Toews and start putting the puck in more. IMO it's hurting him more then it's helping the team.



Can't take penalties in the final minutes of a tie game.



Emery played well considering how many shots he had on him.



Can we be done with Bickell already? He brings no value to this team whatsoever and I'd rather see Hayes play his spot considering he uses his size correctly.



Scott > Bickell
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
emery was okay. he did allow a plethora of rebounds all night. I wouldn't pin the loss on him but I did find him shakey at times.



kanes high stick was a highstick. It just was. Its too bad it happened but it can't be seen as a non highstick.



Officials missed a lot of calls on the Flyers there is no doubt about it... they also let the hawks get away with a few. Yet they also called the Hawks and didn't call the Flyers so there is some oddness there. The call on Sharp didn't cause any goals against and frankly on the time line that can not be erased the Hawks scored 2 goals directly after that penatly call. So who is to say it cost us the game and didn't actually spawn the comeback?



Ask why the Hawks opened up the game after they tied it and didn't tighten up defensively and play for the point. That's my question for the team. They literally decided to play an open game and let the flyers match fire power for firepower. Incase anyone noticed that game and this season..the Flyers have firepower and can match ours. Was a really questionable decision in my opinion. I do beleive the Hawks could have shut them down for the remainder of regualtion and played it out for the point. The extra point should have been an OT concern.



Just my opinion.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,678
Liked Posts:
3,048
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
emery was okay. he did allow a plethora of rebounds all night. I wouldn't pin the loss on him but I did find him shakey at times.



kanes high stick was a highstick. It just was. Its too bad it happened but it can't be seen as a non highstick.



Officials missed a lot of calls on the Flyers there is no doubt about it... they also let the hawks get away with a few. Yet they also called the Hawks and didn't call the Flyers so there is some oddness there. The call on Sharp didn't cause any goals against and frankly on the time line that can not be erased the Hawks scored 2 goals directly after that penatly call. So who is to say it cost us the game and didn't actually spawn the comeback?



Ask why the Hawks opened up the game after they tied it and didn't tighten up defensively and play for the point. That's my question for the team. They literally decided to play an open game and let the flyers match fire power for firepower. Incase anyone noticed that game and this season..the Flyers have firepower and can match ours. Was a really questionable decision in my opinion. I do beleive the Hawks could have shut them down for the remainder of regualtion and played it out for the point. The extra point should have been an OT concern.



Just my opinion.

They couldn't tighten up what they never had to begin with. There was no defense this game; every skater looked like an epileptic in a disco when entering the defending zone.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
emery was okay. he did allow a plethora of rebounds all night. I wouldn't pin the loss on him but I did find him shakey at times.



kanes high stick was a highstick. It just was. Its too bad it happened but it can't be seen as a non highstick.



Officials missed a lot of calls on the Flyers there is no doubt about it... they also let the hawks get away with a few. Yet they also called the Hawks and didn't call the Flyers so there is some oddness there. The call on Sharp didn't cause any goals against and frankly on the time line that can not be erased the Hawks scored 2 goals directly after that penatly call. So who is to say it cost us the game and didn't actually spawn the comeback?



Ask why the Hawks opened up the game after they tied it and didn't tighten up defensively and play for the point. That's my question for the team. They literally decided to play an open game and let the flyers match fire power for firepower. Incase anyone noticed that game and this season..the Flyers have firepower and can match ours. Was a really questionable decision in my opinion. I do beleive the Hawks could have shut them down for the remainder of regualtion and played it out for the point. The extra point should have been an OT concern.



Just my opinion.



I don't think the Sharp penalty cost us the game at all. The Kane penalty certainly did though.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Also, I mentioned it in the chat and I've seen you mention it a few times TCD, but why the heck did the Hawks continue to play a wide open game after Kane tied it up? They were taking a lot of chances when really they should have shut it down, played a trap and try to take advantage of them in transition until OT.



They were all over the place, seemed like there was a sense of desperation for us to win the game in regulation. Or maybe they were just too amp'd after Kane tied it and became overly confident? Who knows, either way it was a pretty high tempo game so they very well could have been pumping on adrenaline at that point--its up to Q to calm them down.



Nothing wrong with trapping at that point in the game against an Eastern Conference team, especially when we are playing a team that can certainly burn us if we open things up. The next time we are in that situation, I hope they would consider slowing things down instead of scrambling and losing their positioning due to all the chances they took.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Didnt the Hawks lose a game in Philly in similar fashion 2 years ago?
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,678
Liked Posts:
3,048
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Actually, yeah. Scott hasn't been the greatest thing since, well, Bob Probert, but he's been steady, consistant, and you know what you'll get out of him. Right now, I would say in D depth he's got to be #5 in terms of play.



Scary thought, but i think it should be kudos for Scott. I hope he gets a little more ice time and chances. He hasn't been worse than O'donnel, Montador, or Lepistopheles.



Oh, and caught this on the Yahoo post-game write-up:

"

“Razor did his job stopping the first chances,” Toews said about Emery. “We just have to do better with the second chances."



Thanks Toews...but talk is cheap...DO IT MAN!!!!!
 

Top