[A] Watch Your Back: Full Roster; Trades Coming

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
With the recent signings of Johnny Oduya and Jamal Mayers it seems as if Stan Bowman plans on bringing back the 2011-2012 Blackhawks for another try, but that simply isn't the case according to the Blackhawks GM:



“It’s the same we do each year; take a look at the players who are available in July, and there’s always some activity around the draft. I think you have to be open to trying to improve your team,” he said. “We’re not even at July yet; we’re going to look at making additional changes to our team. We’re always looking for players who are coming back to take steps forward… and grow their games, as well.”



Bowman also acknowledged that there is a size issue on defense that is yet to be addressed, and even with Oduya signed that doesn't mean they won't pursue other options. Of course, with the recent development one has to believe that Stan will have to accomplish his goals via trade with just under $3M in cap space heading into the draft and later on, free agency.



If Stan's plan is the trade route, there are three players that you'll have to look out for in the rumor mill and here is why the writing is on the wall for them:



Dave Bolland

[float=left]http://3.cdn.nhle.com/blackhawks/v2/photos/mugs/8471245.jpg[/float]As much as I love Bolland, signs are starting to point to his departure from Chicago. Although he still has two years remaining on his deal, the $3.375M cap hit seems steep for a 3rd line center when the Blackhawks have complete confidence in Marcus Kruger, who still has one more year remaining on his entry-level contract for nearly 1/4th of the cost. With Jamal Mayers receiving an extension for another year, the Blackhawks clearly have their 1st, 3rd, and 4th line centers solidified.



It's no secret that the Blackhawks brass refused (and will continue to refuse) to move Bolland up to the 2nd line despite the fact that Kruger clearly is not ready to handle that role. So much to the point that Patrick Kane was forced to slide to the middle and take over that duty. If they truly believe Bolland will never contribute as a top-2 center in Chicago (although I firmly disagree) perhaps they think it's time to send him packing for someone who can.



Michael Frolik

[float=left]http://1.cdn.nhle.com/blackhawks/v2/photos/mugs/8473564.jpg[/float]There really isn't much that I can say, it's pretty obvious that Frolik has under-performed after signing his $2.333M deal last summer despite his commendable work ethic. With Viktor Stalberg elevating his game to another level, Frolik has found himself out of the top-six and eventually losing his job completely to Andrew Shaw and Jimmy Hayes, finding himself warming the press box until getting a chance to prove himself again in the playoffs where he was one of the Blackhawks few bright spots.



If Bowman gets any offers, he just might take them while Frolik's playoff performance is still fresh in the hockey minds of those who are interested while allowing younger potential such as Andrew Shaw to take over the reigns.



Niklas Hjalmarsson

[float=left]http://1.cdn.nhle.com/blackhawks/v2/photos/mugs/8471769.jpg[/float]Much like Bolland, there is still two years remaining on Hjalmarsson's contract. Although Hjalmarsson certainly isn't a bad defenseman, the Blackhawks publicly recognize that there is still work to be done on defense. Signing Johnny Oduya at a lesser cap hit with more production (189 blocked shots in 2 years, 35 points) won't help Hjalmarsson's chances of staying in Chicago. And again, with Stan publicly admitting that there is the need for a bigger, tougher defenseman then Nik might be the only logical choice of the Blackhawks current top-six to find a new home.



As it stands, there is too much of the same on the Blackhawks backend, trading someone like Hjalmarsson could potentially fix multiple problems with the same stone as well as open up room for the Blackhawks to actively pursue Ryan Suter.



Then again, we've heard this song and dance from Bowman before. Talk is cheap and so far all Stan has done in his short time as GM in Chicago is acknowledge problems without addressing them with viable solutions. If Stan is going to make a deal in order to improve this team as he says he is actively pursuing, he's going to have to make room for them as there is under $3M in cap space remaining. If not, look forward to seeing a few more cheap band-aids to patch the holes or maybe he even blows the entire wad on another average player.



At some point he's going to have to fill those holes... band-aids just aren't cutting it. Overall, from Bowman's tone he sounds as if his focus remains on defense. Although there is no talk about acquiring a center, just remember that more often than not the trade front is kept pretty neatly hidden away from the media until an announcement is going to be made. With Bolland and Kruger suiting up, and neither of them filling the role as a 2nd line center, something will have to give or Bowman will be answering the same questions next April.



Click here to view the article
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Knowing the media, you are going to hear Kane's name as well. His TMZ Cinco De Mayo partying only adds fuel to the fire for some writers.



Frolik might bring in decent return, I know he could be a top 6 forward in this league, but not right now on the Hawks (I do believe he's better than Stalberg though).
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,678
Liked Posts:
3,048
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
My only problem with moving Bolland is that Kruger, even at 1/4 of his price, cannot even sniff his jock, much less take over 3rd line duties, much less be a #2C.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
My only problem with moving Bolland is that Kruger, even at 1/4 of his price, cannot even sniff his jock, much less take over 3rd line duties, much less be a #2C.



As much as I agree, do the Blackhawks? Seems like the writing is on the wall for all three of these players. I would not be surprised if any of them were moved.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,678
Liked Posts:
3,048
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Honestly, neither would I....and that's the sad part. I can see Hammer going & Frolik going if we could find dance partners, but if we send out Bolland we better be getting a nice piece back in return, but unfortunately Stan will be content with an over-the-hill geezer and UHL-level prospects in return.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
My only problem with moving Bolland is that Kruger, even at 1/4 of his price, cannot even sniff his jock, much less take over 3rd line duties, much less be a #2C.



It is tragic that bolly hasnt been given a real shot at #2. We've all seen it, give him some wingers and he is a force on the ice
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Knowing the media, you are going to hear Kane's name as well. His TMZ Cinco De Mayo partying only adds fuel to the fire for some writers.



Frolik might bring in decent return, I know he could be a top 6 forward in this league, but not right now on the Hawks (I do believe he's better than Stalberg though).



Frolik is better than Stalberg? ...........
<
 

Shoots_he_scores

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
498
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
University of North Dakota, by way of Oak Lawn
I'd really hate to lose Bolland, if you move that salary they'd have to make a run at a guy like Gaustad who's gonna cost pretty much exactly what Bolland does so it's pointless to move him.



Frolik will stay cause of the way he played against Phoenix, Scooter and crew bought him last year after seeing him play well in the playoffs, judging from their intelligence level from the past, they'll fall for it again.



Hammer is the most logical choice to me, but what exactly are you going to get, the Hawks need another top 6 forward IMO. Either a 2nd line center or a LW to replace Sharp and then move Sharp back to Center the 2nd line. Not so sure Hammer brings either one of those.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Frolik is better than Stalberg? ...........
<

I know its funny and easy to pick apart a guy who didn't get much ice time. But Frolik isn't a 4th line guy. He is a top 6 forward who got stuck in a slump and never got a chance to get out (except in the playoffs when he had more goals than Kane, Sharp and Stalberg when he was given the minutes).



Stalberg has topped out his potential. He doesn't have hands and his hockey sense is lacking. His shot is awful and he had a terrible time scoring on empty nets. Kane got him probably 90% of his goals.



Frolik has proven that he can play when given the minutes outside of his slump. Shit, he had 40+ on a horrible Panthers team as a 21 year old.



He's 23 don't forget, same age as Toews and Kane.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I'd really hate to lose Bolland, if you move that salary they'd have to make a run at a guy like Gaustad who's gonna cost pretty much exactly what Bolland does so it's pointless to move him.



Frolik will stay cause of the way he played against Phoenix, Scooter and crew bought him last year after seeing him play well in the playoffs, judging from their intelligence level from the past, they'll fall for it again.



Hammer is the most logical choice to me, but what exactly are you going to get, the Hawks need another top 6 forward IMO. Either a 2nd line center or a LW to replace Sharp and then move Sharp back to Center the 2nd line. Not so sure Hammer brings either one of those.



Saad might be able to step in on the 2nd line LW. Maybe it will be Morin's chance to move up too.



Sooner or later you gotta give the kids a chance to see what they can do.
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
Whoever gets moved, if anybody, I will enjoy hearing the commentary that comes out of them about this last season with Blackhawks.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,928
Liked Posts:
26,410
Agree with most of your article but it would be a huge mistake for the Hawks to move Bolland. Not many better checking line centers than Bolland.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
I know its funny and easy to pick apart a guy who didn't get much ice time. But Frolik isn't a 4th line guy. He is a top 6 forward who got stuck in a slump and never got a chance to get out (except in the playoffs when he had more goals than Kane, Sharp and Stalberg when he was given the minutes).



Stalberg has topped out his potential. He doesn't have hands and his hockey sense is lacking. His shot is awful and he had a terrible time scoring on empty nets. Kane got him probably 90% of his goals.



Frolik has proven that he can play when given the minutes outside of his slump. Shit, he had 40+ on a horrible Panthers team as a 21 year old.



He's 23 don't forget, same age as Toews and Kane.



I disagree completely about Stalberg having topping out. Through out last season he progressed nicely and I don't think he has come close to his full potential. One would have had not been paying attention if they didn't see him improve month by month. That goes for all parts of his game. Not sure how you can say he has topped out after one and a half real NHL seasons. I see nothing that says he has.



Frolik didn't earn any more minutes, Stalberg did. That's pretty much the story in the hockey world. You either take the minutes you get and do something with them or you don't. Those who do produce will be rewarded..those who don't produce will be burried. Pretty basic formula when you are talking about guys like Stalberg and Frolik.



That's only one thing.





Seeing Stalberg plays left wing where this team obviously showed holes while Frolik plays RW where this team has plenty its a no brainer as to why Stalberg got more ice time than Frolik. Stalberg and Sharp were the teams only real LWers. Frolik had tougher competition at the RW position even when Kane was bounced from RW to Center to LW. Frolik wasn't going to bump Hossas minutes down. The one guy that screwed his minutes was Brunette and that weird love affair Stan/Q had with him. Thank god he's gone. I would have rather had Frolik taking Brunette's minutes anyday.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
As for Bolland. I wouldn't put it past him to be asked to be traded after watching Kruger come in get his dick sucked by Q and Stan. Im sure Bolland knows his roll on the team though and that hes seen as the 3rd line center. But I also bet he knows he is better than that and I am sure a few of the other 29 teams in the league know it also.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I know its funny and easy to pick apart a guy who didn't get much ice time. But Frolik isn't a 4th line guy. He is a top 6 forward who got stuck in a slump and never got a chance to get out (except in the playoffs when he had more goals than Kane, Sharp and Stalberg when he was given the minutes).



Stalberg has topped out his potential. He doesn't have hands and his hockey sense is lacking. His shot is awful and he had a terrible time scoring on empty nets. Kane got him probably 90% of his goals.



Frolik has proven that he can play when given the minutes outside of his slump. Shit, he had 40+ on a horrible Panthers team as a 21 year old.



He's 23 don't forget, same age as Toews and Kane.



No. Just, no. Stalberg improved drastically over the last year, and I think he's still going to get better. Frolik, meanwhile, has REGRESSED. I will be fucking AMAZED if Frolik ever gets CLOSE to 20 goals again in his career. He brings absolutely nothing to the table that would cement him into a CONTENDER'S top six. He got those points in Florida because they fucking sucked, and he got the minutes by default. He's a soft, stupid, hard working, finesse player, who should be playing in Europe. You're fucking high if you think Frolik's potential is anywhere NEAR Stalberg's. Stalberg has elite speed, and great NHL size. Frolik has...what? He works hard and is a decent skater, with a fucking pathetic shot? Yeah, awesome. Really a solid option for the top six.



Also, Frolik is 24, and Stalberg is 26. Hardly an earth shattering difference in age there.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
No. Just, no. Stalberg improved drastically over the last year, and I think he's still going to get better. Frolik, meanwhile, has REGRESSED. I will be fucking AMAZED if Frolik ever gets CLOSE to 20 goals again in his career. He brings absolutely nothing to the table that would cement him into a CONTENDER'S top six. He got those points in Florida because they fucking sucked, and he got the minutes by default. He's a soft, stupid, hard working, finesse player, who should be playing in Europe. You're fucking high if you think Frolik's potential is anywhere NEAR Stalberg's. Stalberg has elite speed, and great NHL size. Frolik has...what? He works hard and is a decent skater, with a fucking pathetic shot? Yeah, awesome. Really a solid option for the top six.



Also, Frolik is 24, and Stalberg is 26. Hardly an earth shattering difference in age there.



Frolik is soft? Should be in Europe? Stupid? Where do you come up with this shit?



Stalberg has no hockey sense, his shot is worse. Dead into the goalies chest or over the net. You put Frolik with Kane and you have a nice line right there as well. Problem is Frolik is a RW, not a LW which Stalberg plays.



Frolik is a skilled forward, not a 4th line forward. The fact that he's 24 only shows that he still is young and he's going to get better. How does Stalberg get better? Not much room. His upside isn't as large as Froliks. Put Frolik on a team that isn't heavy on RW and he gets your 20 goals easily. NHL size? This isn't 1994 anymore Pez, you don't have to be a large guy to score points.



If Stalberg had any hockey sense his potential would be higher, but with Frolik having the hockey sense and being 2 years younger, he has the better outlook. Stalberg had a good year, but how many guys have a good season playing with star players and then fall off the face of the Earth?
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Frolik is soft? Should be in Europe? Stupid? Where do you come up with this shit?



Stalberg has no hockey sense, his shot is worse. Dead into the goalies chest or over the net. You put Frolik with Kane and you have a nice line right there as well. Problem is Frolik is a RW, not a LW which Stalberg plays.



Frolik is a skilled forward, not a 4th line forward. The fact that he's 24 only shows that he still is young and he's going to get better. How does Stalberg get better? Not much room. His upside isn't as large as Froliks. Put Frolik on a team that isn't heavy on RW and he gets your 20 goals easily. NHL size? This isn't 1994 anymore Pez, you don't have to be a large guy to score points.



If Stalberg had any hockey sense his potential would be higher, but with Frolik having the hockey sense and being 2 years younger, he has the better outlook. Stalberg had a good year, but how many guys have a good season playing with star players and then fall off the face of the Earth?



I have a solution, trade them both and there everyone is happy
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I have a solution, trade them both and there everyone is happy

To say Stalberg who got more minutes and was playing with Patrick Kane all season is better player than Frolik who played with Jamal Mayers and played crap minutes is a joke.



Stalberg also had 10 points against Columbus (8 were goals) who let up the 3rd most amount of goals in the league. You take away that series against the Bluejackets and he has 14 goals in 71 games and 33 points. Frolik got half that playing shit minutes... Big fucking deal...



Frolik averaged 17 minutes in the playoffs and had 3 points in his 4 games. Who's minutes dropped in the later games of the season? Stalbergs (last game played 12 minutes).



Interesting...
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Frankly both can go for all I care
 

Top