I’m a moderate to be retired on May 1 and I can afford the tickets but then add in another hour drive time and it’s not as glamorous..I’m not sure anybody is going to sell their tickets at a loss.
So I think there are a couple of concurrent questions we are discussing.
Will an 80,000 seat stadium in Arlington heights have lower ticket prices on the budget end of the secondary market than a 60,000 seat Soldier Field?
Possibly. Significantly increased size puts downward pressure on price. Location puts downward pressure for people (like you) that think the location isn't glamorous. It is possible that a shiny new stadium overcomes those things, but ultimately this isn't even what I was intending to comment on.
Will an 80,000 SF football stadium have lower budget end secondary market ticket prices than a 60,000 SF stadium when holding all else constant? (What I was intending to say in my initial assertation)
Yes due to the most basic economic principles of supply and demand.
As far as people selling at a loss - mostly irrelevant. Enough speculators are out there that have no/minimal interest in going to the games that this line of thinking would be a minor speed bump if ticket prices even dipped that low, which is lower than I was attempting to insinuate that they would dip. I have no reason to believe that secondary market tickets would ever regularly be materially lower than direct tickets. If they were, it would necessarily be a short term issue that would correct itself if it ever dragged on (Bears would be forced to lower ticket prices because it wouldn't make any sense for people to buy prior to the secondary market).