Al Cimaglia With Some Trade Rumors

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
If we do get Luongo, we may need to change our goal song :troll:

No, in all seriousness, I'd try to get him. He is a sold keeper and really isn't bad, though he has had his down moments (usually against us). He's made fun of and hated for the same reason LeBron is, not for being Koyie Hill.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
Lol, I thought they should of changed the goal song after the 08-09 season. That was what it was all about to me with the push of that brand new deep young team.
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
I would be happy to have Luongo if his cap hit wasn't so big. The Hawks can do a lot of better things with that money.

If it was Schneider they were going to trade, I would be all for it.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
I would be happy to have Luongo if his cap hit wasn't so big. The Hawks can do a lot of better things with that money.

If it was Schneider they were going to trade, I would be all for it.

Those needs are defense primarily which by default automatically look better with a solid goalie behind them.

Getting luongo would be the equivalent of upgrading in goal AND getting one 4-6 defenseman

Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
Those needs are defense primarily which by default automatically look better with a solid goalie behind them.

Getting luongo would be the equivalent of upgrading in goal AND getting one 4-6 defenseman

Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX

You can think whatever you want.

It's just my opinion that I don't want Luongo because of his high cap hit and really long contract.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
You can think whatever you want.

It's just my opinion that I don't want Luongo because of his high cap hit and really long contract.

The length is the real problem

Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
I'm wondering if Beach is ever going to be ANYTHING. He's the most disappointing thing the organization has seen in a while. I had HIGH hopes for him. Signing Olesz and paying Huet like he's Broduer sucked as well but the Beach thing really stings. I thought he was the next big deal.


I hear you Bob - but 2 words: Cam Barker - not many 3rd overalls flop like he did.

Edited -- 2 more: Jack Skille ... -well bonus points- Ty Jones (IIRC)
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
I hear you Bob - but 2 words: Cam Barker - not many 3rd overalls flop like he did.

Edited -- 2 more: Jack Skille ... -well bonus points- Ty Jones (IIRC)

Cam barker trade was an awesome move...

Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
 

Top