- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,260
- Liked Posts:
- 17,856
- Location:
- Chicago, IL.
My favorite teams
I own a W10 Pro key for whenever I finally decide to make the switch. I choose to do so at my own discretion not at Microsoft's behest.
I own a W10 Pro key for whenever I finally decide to make the switch. I choose to do so at my own discretion not at Microsoft's behest.
Choose, not chose. Meaning I have not gone to W10 yet. My only use of W10 was briefly while my personal rig was out of commission and I had to use the Asus ROG laptop I bought for my little sister.
If the application(game) you want to use the most takes advantage of DX12 or Vulkan, or if you want to be a linux gamer, then it should be a factor in your system build. Otherwise, it's simply not a big enough factor in 2016 to plan a system build.
As far as assuming you can run an older bios, you might be out of luck. Manufacturers do revise the boards over time with newer components. These look like identical parts on paper, but are different enough to merit a change to the bios firmware. If I am on contract to provide the network controller for asus, and asus sells millions of these controllers on many variation of boards, then I figure out how to make that part more efficient and with better production yields. Now I need Asus to update the firmware to reflect the changes within the boards that use that chip. Or MSI, or Gigabyte, or whoever makes that board and sources the parts. Same goes with the bridge chips themselves from intel, they also make tiny tweaks that require bios changes.
Whether you luck out and get a motherboard that works properly with an older bios or not becomes a roll of the dice.
If you want to overclock, then plan your build accordingly. I think it's silly to take a proof-of-concept group of system building, then apply it to your daily driver. Especially when cost is important to you.
One benefit of the new APIs(and also remember, they aren't rolled out in most games yet anyways) is that the games are less CPU reliant. So yes, a faster CPU is... faster, but the gap between an i7 and i5 of current generation shrinks quite a bit. Although threads will be a premium. So basically it's going to be a shift in how Intel numbers their future CPUs. So yes, I'd rather go 6600k than a 6700k or non-k. If that is what you're asking. On air, you're getting the same OCs.
DirectX 12 is a windows feature. Vulkan is a cross platform API. Vulkan is better overall for performance features and it is an open platform. In a world of mobile gaming, even if MS adds something to DX12.1 or whatever that makes it better overnight, developers are going to want the flexibility to publish their games on more platforms.
A lot of games run naively on linux. If you only view games on steam, anything that shows Steam OS support for a game means it is a native game or a port.
Wine is a mixed bag. Some games and applications run better under linux and through wine, some run the same, some run worse, and the rest don't run at all. This obviously depends on what which shared libraries a game requires. If the wine developers aren't able to use the license for whatever shared libraries, they need to write an open version to substitute. All Wine does is mimic the necessities for a windows executable to run, and since a windows C: drive is one giant junk drawer of a hierarchy mess, you also would need to know a bit about the windows file structure and registry to get the most out of wine. Wine can load DirectX runtimes fairly easily, but I'm not sure DX12 will have a lot of support for a while. If you're a person that likes to solve puzzles on your system and can navigate/read/understand help systems, wine is super easy. Otherwise I would wait until a new generation of frontends make it even simpler.
thanks for the input. i may dual and run linux on a separate ssd.
so zen is launching in jan http://wccftech.com/amd-zen-launching-ces-january-2017/
i guess i can wait until then to see whats up. I just noticed the fx8300 drop and its as cheap as the i3 6100. It makes me want to build a 1-2yr hold over system. Id be able to salvage everything from that minus the cpu/mobo for another upgrade... well and ram if i want to go ddr4. Sounds fun... i wanted to build an all red 8350--9xxx last year.. hmm something to ponder... i wonder if the 8300 will hit 4.7-5.0 mhz.. base clock is only 3.3
Noticed the FX 8350 price dropped as well. Was thinking along the same lines for the time being until we get confirmation Zen is worth it. Be nice just to swap CPU's without a new MOBO or OS. Although I know I'll see too many real world differences from my current CPU, it'll keep me going for some time.
I'm curious what Zen's price point will be.
zen is am4, 8350 am3... im not sure zen will be backwards compatible or not... zens will be ddr4 and i think am3/3+ only support ddr3.. i may need to double check that though...
whats 8350 in usa?? i see the 8300 is 149 in aus.. same as the i3 6100... it was around 2 something not too long ago iirc. not sure what the 8350 is going for.. ill look later
FX 8350 going for $149.00 on both Amazon and Newegg. Be nice if they could sell me the chip without the crappy stock fan I'm just going to scrap. Might save me a few pennies.
Zen is AM4 only.
Looks like Bristol Ridge will support both DDR3/DDR4, Summit Ridge will not:
UPDATE 1/28/16: I talked with AMD early this week and they confirmed that while products designed for the AM4 socket will contain DDR3 memory controllers they will not be enabled. Motherboard that use the AM4 socket will only support the use of DDR4 memory. Additionally both Bristol Ridge and Summit Ridge will be SoCs.
AM4 will support both its AMD’s Bristol Ridge APU which is set to launch in the middle of 2016 and its first Zen-based CPU named Summit Ridge which will arrive on the desktop in Q4. Bristol Ridge will offer compatibility will both DDR3 and DDR4 memory in the AM4 socket and Summit Ridge will only offer support for DDR4. Memory bandwidth has consistently placed a hard limit on the graphics performance of AMD’s APUs so the transition from DDR3 to DDR4 should allow AMD to offer a considerable jump in graphics performance of its upcoming APUs.
The above is dated Jan. 2016, so please correct me if anything has changed.
imma say it again. Just get a used haswell i5 4690k.
Bet you can find one with a motherboard for less that $200 and nothing is gon touch it at that price.