An article about Doc Rivers and Lebron James possibly going to the Bulls.

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Expect LeBron, Rivers to Flow to Chicago -- NBA FanHouse


Expect LeBron, Rivers to Flow to Chicago1
Comments
Say Something »

5/17/2010 4:42 PM ET By Terence Moore

PrintAText SizeEmailMore

Terence Moore
National Columnist


He's going to the Chicago Bulls.

Trust me.

Oh, and here's another thing: When LeBron James switches his dribbling home around the Great Lakes from Erie to Michigan, he'll bring his own coach with him.

It'll be Doc Rivers.

Now you can move on with the rest of your lives.

What I just said isn't a done deal, only because it is slightly an eternity between now and July 1, when teams officially can begin negotiating with free agents. I mean, James could search deep into his soul, discover that he really doesn't wish to leave the area of his birth and youth in northeastern Ohio and reverse some of those curses on Cleveland sports teams by declaring he'll stay with the Cavaliers.

As for Rivers, his Boston Celtics could win a second world championship in three years this June, and then he could decide to remain with the Big Three for a shot at a third in four years.

Then you have the Bulls, who could shrug over remaining in a free-fall since Michael Jordan left in the late 1990s and refuse to allow James to dictate the terms of his signing.

You also could have little green men invading Earth.

I'll stick with the likelihood of the new-look Bulls finishing the summer with James, Rivers -- and who knows? Maybe Chris Bosh -- to complement the already splendid Derrick Rose. This goes beyond the fact that The Daily Herald of Arlington Heights (Ill)., cited NBA sources on Sunday as saying that James already has contacted Rose to express interest of joining the third-year player as a teammate.

You can attribute my thoughts on LeBron's future to a mighty whisper in a breeze from the Windy City.

There also is common sense.

Which brings us to something that made no sense at the time. In November, James emerged from the ozone -- and not because of the rocket boosters in his legs -- to say that he wished to change the number on his Cleveland uniform from 23 to 6. He said he wanted to do so out of respect for Jordan, his hero, whose No. 23 is retired with the Bulls.

Which means that, if James ever wanted to become a Bull someday, he would have to switch numbers.

Which means this wasn't a coincidence: James completed paperwork in March with the NBA for a number change, and it will become official for the 2010-2011 -- with James in Chicago.

So why didn't this make sense back then? Well, No. 6 belongs to Bill Russell and Julius "Dr. J" Erving. In other words, if James is so into respecting the greats of the past, he also wouldn't have taken No. 6. He did it, anyway, because he was preparing for Chicago.

Rivers is doing the same. For one, he has been hounded by Celtics General Manager Danny Ainge for the last few months to sign a new deal with the franchise before Rivers' current one expires after this season, but Rivers has kept saying no. This is despite Rivers spending the latter half of his six years with the Celtics coaching three aging but potent All-Stars in Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce and Ray Allen.

Not only that, Rivers has Rajon Rando, a rising point guard, and the whole combination has the Celtics these days with a 1-0 lead in the Eastern Conference Finals against the Orlando Magic.

Most folks in the volatile coaching world of the NBA would have signed a new deal within seconds after Ainge asked the first time. Instead, Rivers keeps saying he will wait until the summer to decide his future. He keeps saying that, if he decides to continue as an NBA coach, he wants to stay with the Celtics. Otherwise, he keeps saying that he'll return to the Orlando area, where he'll enjoy retirement at 48 with his wife, Kristen, while following the exploits of his four growing children.

Uh-huh.

We're back to that cliché that goes, "I want to spend more time with my family," which roughly means, "There is something else going on in my life that I don't wish to discuss."

Rivers will join James in Chicago, all right. As solid as the Celtics have been in recent years is as shaky as they could become in a hurry due to aging legs. And Chicago is Rivers' home town. And his wife is from up the road in Milwaukee, where Rivers went to school at Marquette.

This also makes sense for the Bulls. Just from the speculation that James could be headed their way, they've already seen a mighty spike in their seasons ticket sales.

This makes basketball sense, too. Even though James and Rose have been the primary ball handlers for their respective teams, James only was doing so to appease Cavaliers coach Mike Brown, more of a defensive than an offensive guy. James wouldn't have an issue with switching to shooting guard. And speaking of issues, there would be none regarding Rose, a mellow soul, who would defer to King James if asked.

It gets better for the Bulls, who are $20 million under the salary cap. They have enough cash for Vice President of Basketball Operations John Paxson to grab James and others (such as free agent Bosh in a possible sign-and-trade) for a Chicago roster already filled with the impressive likes of Rose, Joakim Noah, Kirk Hinrich and Luol Deng.

You can forget about that John Calipari thing. There were reports that a mutual friend of Calipari and James approached the Bulls about delivering the pair as a package deal.

Calipari's mantra has been that he isn't gong anywhere since he ended his first season as Kentucky basketball coach in March. So, not surprisingly, he ripped this James report on his Twitter account by saying, "Now, do I have to respond to these rumors too?"

No, Calipari doesn't. All he has to do is stay quiet and listen with the rest of us for James (and Rivers) to snort.

You know, like Bulls.
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
why would doc leave the celts esp. if they go to the NBA finals?
 

Dismagic1

Guest
I don't see this happening but there is some logic here. Celtics are getting old and playing out of their minds right now but that team doesn't have a lot left in the tank for future years.

Chicago is the exact opposite of Boston. A very, very young team on the rise. I could see how it would be appealing.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Rivers is overrated. Before the team added two HOF'ers him and Ainge were clowns and people wanted them gone.
 

MRN

MRNeverwearthesamething
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
1,385
Liked Posts:
213
Location:
Springfield,IL
The whole point about the number change not wanting to disrespect the great Michael Jordan doesn't even matter. You only have to put in for a jersey number change if you're staying with your team.
 

ZAN

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
1,286
Liked Posts:
357
Max, not when you sign with a new team....You can take whatever number you'd like.

LeBron's number change with Cleveland was merely a "in case I resign with the Cavaliers" issue.
 

BigP50

04-21-2012
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
7,856
Liked Posts:
548
Location:
Lincoln, Nebraska
we will not get Doc.
 

X

When one letter is enough
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
24,664
Liked Posts:
7,783
I don't want Doc, personally.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
37,853
Liked Posts:
36,625
I actually agree with First on this one. Doc isnt as great as the national media hypes him up to be. Does anyone remember the Celtics before KG and Allen? His teams were mediocre at best year after year. How many post-game interviews have we heard of him not having his team prepared. How about the constant bitching of NBA officiating and fines? The guy is a clown.

If it means getting LeBron, then bring Doc too. I'll take any coach with LeBron. Having a good coach would be a plus at this point but its mostly about the players.
 

Dismagic1

Guest
I actually agree with First on this one. Doc isnt as great as the national media hypes him up to be. Does anyone remember the Celtics before KG and Allen? His teams were mediocre at best year after year. How many post-game interviews have we heard of him not having his team prepared. How about the constant bitching of NBA officiating and fines? The guy is a clown.

If it means getting LeBron, then bring Doc too. I'll take any coach with LeBron. Having a good coach would be a plus at this point but its mostly about the players.

Can Doc be any worse than Vinny or Skiles? I doubt it.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
37,853
Liked Posts:
36,625
Not worse than Vinny but i always thought Skiles was a good coach. To this day i still dont know why the Chicago fan base turned on him so quick.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Can Doc be any worse than Vinny or Skiles? I doubt it.

Firing Skiles was a mistake IMO. The guy can coach. What he did with the Bucks this year was proof of that. He basically had his nuts cut off as soon as Wallace came in and "head band gate" went against him.
 

Dismagic1

Guest
Firing Skiles was a mistake IMO. The guy can coach. What he did with the Bucks this year was proof of that. He basically had his nuts cut off as soon as Wallace came in and "head band gate" went against him.

He's a decent X and O guy but the problem is players hate him.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Not worse than Vinny but i always thought Skiles was a good coach. To this day i still dont know why the Chicago fan base turned on him so quick.

Honestly, that team had expectations that were just too high to the talent that was on the team. Wallace was exposed as the overrated player he was in Detroit, Tyrus Thomas wasn't panning out, Deng was hurt/ineffective/regressing etc. Skiles was the fall guy but no coach was going to do much with that team.

I found it odd as well as normally Chicago fans are meatheaded enough to love firey and loud coaches. Skiles was that. He just happened to be the coach of a team that didn't fulfill expectations that were too high for it to begin with it.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
He's a decent X and O guy but the problem is players hate him.

Problem is, players didn't respect him after Wallace and the FO basically strong handed some moves on the team. Frankly, as much as the players didn't like Skiles he was right about every player that he coached. Honesty and holding some athletes accountable rubs them the wrong way...
 

Dismagic1

Guest
Problem is, players didn't respect him after Wallace and the FO basically strong handed some moves on the team. Frankly, as much as the players didn't like Skiles he was right about every player that he coached. Honesty and holding some athletes accountable rubs them the wrong way...

A coach has to be able to handle players in the right way or they will get run out of town. That's just a fact.
 

Top