Aesopian
Hooters Waitress
- Joined:
- Jan 6, 2015
- Posts:
- 16,283
- Liked Posts:
- 9,233
- Location:
- Jupiter
My favorite teams
And 2 of the 4 wins are against the winless Lions
This team is awful.
And 2 of the 4 wins are against the winless Lions
That might be why there hasn't been love for the DC.Yes.
PFF has to be doing something way different. The fact they gave both Mack and Hicks way more pressures obviously shows they're being more liberal in some manner.
Back when I subscribed to them, years ago before they started charging $200 for what used to be $30, they defined it as I said. Maybe changed recently. certainly still doesn't make sense. You said they gave Mack 59 pressures last year while PFR gave him 31. And gave him 22 this year while PFR gave him 9. Obviously PFF is far more liberal in giving credit for pressures. It's as if they give them away as one would candy on Halloween. Is it just different players they favor for whatever reason? Or you made a mistake and gave the total combined tackles number as the total pressures number.
That might be why there hasn't been love for the DC.
Pretty easy question to answer.
It's the hurries that's mucking it and the only real subjective part. I would tend to side with the lower numbers in that case since it is subjective. The sacks and hits are virtually the same. If 1 is to be honest, don't usually hear Mack's name called until he does get a sack. Haven't seen that much that I would constitute as pressure from him. Watching games with Watt last year, you'd constantly hear his name and could see why PFR had him far in front with 61 pressures. How many did PFF give him? And why do you pay $300 for PFF? LMAOView attachment 15705
View attachment 15706
Nah that is the total. First one is Mack pressures from last year. Second is total pressures for Bears in 2021.
I think PFF is more accurate. First they have been doing it for longer as PFR only started tracking Hurries since 2018. 2nd PFF actually sells their data to NFL teams which means teams actually think their data is somewhat more reliable.
Khalil Mack Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Draft, College | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Checkout the latest stats for Khalil Mack. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, college, draft, and more on Pro-football-reference.com.www.pro-football-reference.com
Finally the PFR data makes little sense. Look at Mack. You can see I am right that thr advanced data starts 2018 but look at his hurries. PFR is claiming that Mack has 6 sacks, 1 QBhit and only 2 hurries. There is no fucking way Mack only had 2 hurries and 1 QB. Pass Rushers always have more hurries than sacks so it makes no fucking sense. PFF has him at 16 hurries which makes far more sense that 2 hurries and 6 sacks.
It's the hurries that's mucking it and the only real subjective part. I would tend to side with the lower numbers in that case since it is subjective. The sacks and hits are virtually the same. If 1 is to be honest, don't usually hear Mack's name called until he does get a sack. Haven't seen that much that I would constitute as pressure from him. Watching games with Watt last year, you'd constantly hear his name and could see why PFR had him far in front with 61 pressures. How many did PFF give him? And why do you pay $300 for PFF? LMAO
Dammmn. LMAO. Was it when Collinsworth got involved that the price skyrocketed like that? I do realize NFL teams use PFF a lot but you don't think that opens up some of the more subjective ratings to be exposed to chicanery?Again one site sells data to NFL teams and one doesnt. One site provides free data to the public and the other charges. One site claims Mack only has 2 pressures all year while the other says he has 16.
I pay for it because it is small change for me and I find the data useful.
Dammmn. LMAO. Was it when Collinsworth got involved that the price skyrocketed like that? I do realize NFL teams use PFF a lot but you don't think that opens up some of the more subjective ratings to be exposed to chicanery?
On one hand you guys are saying Desai should have played max coverage but then when he plays a max coverage like Cover 3 with 3 deep guys, you are saying he shouldnt play that since Vildor was one of the deep guys.
This argument is so absurd.
Not at all what I said, but why bother? You don't read my posts. You scan, grab a phrase that ignites a contrary spark and run with it.
Oh no doubt, but as a wise sage on CCS who went by the handle of remydat taught everyone: "It takes two to vortex".
Cover 3 gives safety help on inside breaking routes not deep verticals. This is objective fact. Desai should not have had them in Cover 3.
Cover 3 is NOT safety help for the corners deep and Vildor got beat deep in cover 3 per your own image.
Cover 3 or 4 almost always means no S help for the CB because the CB has his own deep zone to cover along witht he Safeties.
You are saying Vildor needs help and my point is that can only happen in Cover 1 or Cover 2 which means less deep protection as the deep defenders have more ground to cover.
I’m not saying don’t put him there, just not alone.You fail to recognize Vildor had S help on 2 of the 3 plays in question.
It is also stupid to say Vildor cant be put in a Cover 3 when you are protecting the deep pass. If you want more guys covering deep zones you have to use CBs.
This argument is so absurd. On one hand you guys are saying Desai should have played max coverage but then when he plays a max coverage like Cover 3 with 3 deep guys, you are saying he shouldnt play that since Vildor was one of the deep guys.
You cannot have 3 or 4 guys covering a deep zone without having a CB being one of those guys.
Yep
Cover 2 gives less deep protection than Cover 3? Citation needed on this one. Oh wait I see what you are doing. You are saying that IF Vildor gets S help in Cover 2 then that takes the S out of his deep 1/2 zone.
If that is what you mean. that's not true. The S on Vildor's side sticks his zone and the window on top of Vildor in front of the S running over as the ball is out of QB's hand is tighter than Cover 3 where the safety is single high and needs more ground to cover after the QB looks Vildor's way. So much ground that the S is not really a help - nor designed to be in Cover 3.
If that's not what you mean, I'll need clarification. Thanks.
I’m not saying don’t put him there, just not alone