Bears changes at NT involve more than drafting Eddie Goldman

Sagbear

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
3,987
Liked Posts:
1,601
http://www.csnchicago.com/bears/bears-changes-nt-involve-more-drafting-eddie-goldman

During this year’s Scouting Combine, Bears GM Ryan Pace said that his early assessment of the roster was that the Bears had two players capable of anchoring the middle of the coming 3-4 defense. Ego Ferguson was a stout first-year player, and Jeremiah Ratliff had earned trips to Pro Bowls as a nose tackle.

In keeping with the fluid nature of so many positions, particularly on defense, things have changed. And are changing. It has to do with considerably more than just what transpired in last weekend’s draft.

Most immediately, the Bears used a second-round pick (39th overall) to add Florida State’s Eddie Goldman, a prototypical nose tackle and the biggest player on the Bears’ roster at 335 pounds. Goldman will not be handed the starting job day one but the defensive surprise of the offseason will be if Goldman is not the Week 1 starter.

He fits precisely the template of coach John Fox for a nose tackle in base 3-4.

“You’re good on defense when you’re good up the middle,” Fox said. “I think we’ve got some good candidates there… a block-eater inside that’s tough and doesn’t get knocked off the ball.”

More interesting, however, is what now becomes of Ferguson and Ratliff. Because neither quite fits the classic mold of 3-4 “block-eater,” for slightly different reasons.

Ratliff, who did not attend last week’s voluntary minicamp sessions, is not expected to wind up at nose tackle after all. He can play the position. But because of his age (34 in August), size (305) and standing as the best pass rusher among the current defensive linemen, Ratliff projects to be at end where his rush skills can be put to maximum use, rather than hunkering down inside with a primary assignment of run stuffing.

Meanwhile, Ferguson has gone from a 4-3 backup nose tackle in 2014 to a 3-4 nose this year, and also has turned up at defensive end as well in the “Where’s Waldo?” shuffling of nearly every defensive lineman into nearly every defensive position. End or tackle?

“Just call me a ‘D-lineman,” Ferguson said, laughing. “That’s the best way.”

Last year’s Bears coaches told Ferguson before he was drafted that one plan was to use him in part as a “two-technique,” playing head up on a guard instead of shaded to a gap. Ferguson started no games in 2014 as Stephen Paea had a breakout year that earned him a multi-year deal with the Washington Redskins.

But Ferguson has been the object of in-depth discussions and scenarios this offseason.

“We’ve talked about [Ferguson] a lot,” Pace said after the draft. “We project him as really nose and end. He can be both for us. So we don’t have him set at one position right now. He can be a nose or an end. He has position flexibility there, too.”

What becomes significant with Ferguson is his weight loss, to the point of being sub-300 pounds — not the stuff of nose tackles. It is weight loss by design.

“I feel like this fits me,” Ferguson said. “I lost about 15 pounds, to 298-299, just trying to get a little more pass rushing and being able to run around a little more. I think 295-300 will be about right.

“They want you to be strong and explosive, not just big.”


The combination of Goldman, flanked by Jarvis Jenkins and Ray McDonald in 3-4 base, with a lighter-quicker Ferguson jumping in with Ratliff on sub packages becomes an intriguing prospect in an overall scheme makeover.

“As far as body types, styles, all those things, everybody comes in different shapes and sizes,” Fox said. “And we’ll get a chance to evaluate it.”
 

Aquineas

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,068
Liked Posts:
6,769
Location:
Montgomery, TX
My favorite teams
  1. Buffalo Bills
  2. Chicago Bears
I'm having a hard time seeing how this defense will not be upgraded appreciably.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
I'm having a hard time seeing how this defense will not be upgraded appreciably.

Because of all the tier 3 and 4 journeymen FA's we added on one year "prove it" deals?
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,537
Liked Posts:
10,250
Because of all the tier 3 and 4 journeymen FA's we added on one year "prove it" deals?

I wouldn't call them journeymen because that implies that they are old.

There is nothing wrong with signing players in their mid 20s to prove it deals. Would you rather overpay them? The Bears need depth.
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,193
Liked Posts:
11,019
Because of all the tier 3 and 4 journeymen FA's we added on one year "prove it" deals?

Those one year "prove it" deals are becoming the norm rather than the exception, and only the true top tier FAs in their primes are getting the big guaranteed bucks.
 

Aquineas

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,068
Liked Posts:
6,769
Location:
Montgomery, TX
My favorite teams
  1. Buffalo Bills
  2. Chicago Bears
Because of all the tier 3 and 4 journeymen FA's we added on one year "prove it" deals?

Let's revisit this thread in the season and see how things turn out.
 

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
4,251
Liked Posts:
3,959
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
Didn't realize Ego was sub-300 lbs. I thought him and Goldman would make a decent 1-2 punch at NT. Not sure if he can effectively play nose so light.
 

sevvy

Get rich, or try dying
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,922
Liked Posts:
20,285
Location:
Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Because of all the tier 3 and 4 journeymen FA's we added on one year "prove it" deals?

If all of our signings have been tier 3 or 4, then that means before that, we had a roster full of tier 5 players. Soooooo that's an upgrade.
 

bears26

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 29, 2012
Posts:
24,009
Liked Posts:
27,552
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. Houston Rockets
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Oklahoma Sooners
Defensive line definately looks improved on paper. How many lineman do you see us keeping on the 53 this year?
 

Smokey Robinson

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
4,893
Liked Posts:
4,158
Location:
The 6ix
The Bears have a bunch of guys who can be lined up at different spots. Pace mentioned Ratliff and Ego as options to play both DE and NT and he has mentioned that both the base OLBs, McPhee and Houston, can slide in and play DE in sub packages. After years of vanilla defensive schemes it will be very interesting to see what a creative, top-flight defensive mind can do to keep teams guessing.
 

Sculpt

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,944
Liked Posts:
3,111
Didn't realize Ego was sub-300 lbs. I thought him and Goldman would make a decent 1-2 punch at NT. Not sure if he can effectively play nose so light.
i was counting on Ego as Goldman's backup. Guess 300ish Ego & Ratliff are going to have to last the season. maybe we'll have a 330 prospect on the PS.


McDonald
Jenkins
Ferguson
Ratliff
Goldman
Sutton/someone that fits in better

I'm thinking 6.
then we have Washington under contract... will be some competition; but looks about right.


The Bears have a bunch of guys who can be lined up at different spots. Pace mentioned Ratliff and Ego as options to play both DE and NT and he has mentioned that both the base OLBs, McPhee and Houston, can slide in and play DE in sub packages. After years of vanilla defensive schemes it will be very interesting to see what a creative, top-flight defensive mind can do to keep teams guessing.
I expect a rather lopsided 53 toward the Defense. We have so many D prospects.
 

Top