Collins77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 19, 2017
- Posts:
- 1,269
- Liked Posts:
- 929
So does that mean the salary cap will be raised since there will be an additional game revenue?
They are getting paid for the 17th. Please don’t believe for a minute the players would play a regular season game for free.True in terms if cap growth but they are not getting paid for that extra game, especially not this year, or those whose have existing agreements. They get paid the same for an additional game of wear and tear.
How Demaurice Smith is still around is beyond me.
It’s better than a 4th preseason game.Definitely don't think we needed a 17th game...but considering the players agreed to this in the CBA and are making infinitely more money than more important people in society such as doctors, teachers, scientists, engineers etc, I couldn't really give a shit less.
It’s not actually 1 more game. It’s still only 20 games like it’s always been but now they actually get paid for 17 instead of 16They get free timeouts to catch their breath all the time due to commercial breaks. NFL hasn't been about training harder than the opponent (holding up 4 fingers in the 4th Qtr) since HS or lower level non-TV collegiate games. The players will survive 1 more game. I personally wouldn't mind a 2nd bye week TBH. Just start a week earlier since everybody's chomping for it all summer anyway.
Maybe now, a Bears QB might finally have a 4,000yrd season?
The increase in revenue will applied to next years cap, and will not effect this years cap. Some players will get paid extra, it depends on their contract wording, but most won't.So does that mean the salary cap will be raised since there will be an additional game revenue?
Starters don't play the 4th preseason game, so from a players perspective, no it's not.It’s better than a 4th preseason game.
You are an idiot.Starters don't play the 4th preseason game, so from a players perspective, no it's not.
They are getting paid for the 17th. Please don’t believe for a minute the players would play a regular season game for free.
They are getting paid for the 17th. Please don’t believe for a minute the players would play a regular season game for free.
They are not though. Demaurice Smith is a dunce.
They will benefit later when the new contracts get rolled out with the rev deal, but there was not a change in their contract to lift their pay due to an extra game.
"
What about existing contracts that run into seasons that could expand to 17 games? Will those be adjusted?
Yes. Any player who is under contract when the new CBA is signed and remains on that contract in a year in which the league plays 17 games will receive a bonus of 1/17th of his salary if he's on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
So, to make it simple: If your current contract says you're scheduled to earn $17 million in 2021, and the league expands to 17 games that season, you get an extra $1 million as long as you're on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
"
What you need to know about the approved NFL CBA: Biggest changes and what's new
Two more playoff teams. Expanded rosters. A 17th game ... eventually. Here's everything in the new CBA that will run through the 2030 season.www.espn.com
Thanks! I stand corrected, for some reason I thought players made statements about the pay issue, but glad I was wrong about this part at least.
Wondering if this has to be retrofitted into the cap.
"
What about existing contracts that run into seasons that could expand to 17 games? Will those be adjusted?
Yes. Any player who is under contract when the new CBA is signed and remains on that contract in a year in which the league plays 17 games will receive a bonus of 1/17th of his salary if he's on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
So, to make it simple: If your current contract says you're scheduled to earn $17 million in 2021, and the league expands to 17 games that season, you get an extra $1 million as long as you're on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
"
What you need to know about the approved NFL CBA: Biggest changes and what's new
Two more playoff teams. Expanded rosters. A 17th game ... eventually. Here's everything in the new CBA that will run through the 2030 season.www.espn.com
Your point is correct- But I am just gonna be an asswipe and correct the math.
if their contract was 16 million previously, they would get one million extra for the game.
If it was previously 17 million, they would get 1,062,500 for the extra game.
ok...I am done being a douchebag. for now.
I'm an idiot.
The increase in revenue will applied to next years cap, and will not effect this years cap. Some players will get paid extra, it depends on their contract wording, but most won't.
"
What about existing contracts that run into seasons that could expand to 17 games? Will those be adjusted?
Yes. Any player who is under contract when the new CBA is signed and remains on that contract in a year in which the league plays 17 games will receive a bonus of 1/17th of his salary if he's on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
So, to make it simple: If your current contract says you're scheduled to earn $17 million in 2021, and the league expands to 17 games that season, you get an extra $1 million as long as you're on the roster on the date of that 17th game.
"
What you need to know about the approved NFL CBA: Biggest changes and what's new
Two more playoff teams. Expanded rosters. A 17th game ... eventually. Here's everything in the new CBA that will run through the 2030 season.www.espn.com
If the players didn't want it, they shouldn't have agreed to it in the collective bargaining agreement. Sure, it's a money grab by the owners, but a percentage of that go's to the players, so they are not without blame here. The cap each year is figured on a percentage of revenue, more games, more revenue, more money for the players.
It was collectively bargained. The union would've never agreed to a 17 game without compensationThanks! I stand corrected, for some reason I thought players made statements about the pay issue, but glad I was wrong about this part at least.
Wondering if this has to be retrofitted into the cap.