Bears trade down or even out of the 1st round.

[dabears70]

I think this is the best decision for the Bears in this draft because moving up as high as we would need to for a QB is just too costly. Now i wouldn't hate it but to get the 4th best QB is taking a huge risk especially knowing all QB's no matter where they're taken are huge risks.

Trade down scenarios.

Chicago Bears 2021 NFL Draft: Ideal Round 1 trade-back scenarios

If the Chicago Bears truly wanted to maximize the 2021 NFL Draft, they would opt for one of these first round trade-back scenarios.

email.fansided.com

Trade out of 1st round scenarios.

Chicago Bears NFL Draft 2021: 5 scenarios trading out of the first

If the Chicago Bears wanted to maximize value in the 2021 NFL Draft, they could opt for one of these scenarios and trade out of the first round.

email.fansided.com

The trade with the Balt, Raiders and Dolphins would be tough to turn down.

 

[TL1961]

I think this is the best decision for the Bears in this draft because moving up as high as we would need to for a QB is just too costly. Now i wouldn't hate it but to get the 4th best QB is taking a huge risk especially knowing all QB's no matter where they're taken are huge risks.

Trade down scenarios.

Chicago Bears 2021 NFL Draft: Ideal Round 1 trade-back scenarios

If the Chicago Bears truly wanted to maximize the 2021 NFL Draft, they would opt for one of these first round trade-back scenarios.

email.fansided.com

Trade out of 1st round scenarios.

Chicago Bears NFL Draft 2021: 5 scenarios trading out of the first

If the Chicago Bears wanted to maximize value in the 2021 NFL Draft, they could opt for one of these scenarios and trade out of the first round.

email.fansided.com

The trade with the Balt, Raiders and Dolphins would be tough to turn down.

Why does trading down make sense just because trading up to #4 is too expensive?

Why am I responding to your post?

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

Well if fansided said so....

 

[KittiesKorner]

GED forum is that way

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

even though you can’t see, because you have 3 people not on ignore, they’re making fun of you again.

 

[WindyCity]

Who are people moving up to 20 for? I am not sure the pick is going to generate a ton of interest.

If they cannot land a QB early in round 1... I am fine with a move down if it is available, but I am not sure I see it happening.

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

Who are people moving up to 20 for? I am not sure the pick is going to generate a ton of interest.

It would seem to me that the only people who would be looking to trade up to #20 are those who want to select a position that the Bears need. It's is an amazingly shitty idea. Not a surprise that Fansided, and now @dabears70, are proponents of it.

 

[dabears70]

even though you can’t see, because you have 3 people not on ignore, they’re making fun of you again.

 

[Briggs is GOAT]

Who are people moving up to 20 for? I am not sure the pick is going to generate a ton of interest.

If they cannot land a QB early in round 1... I am fine with a move down if it is available, but I am not sure I see it happening.

Perhaps someone like Darrisaw?

 

[ZOMBIE@CTESPN]

Luckily I’m on ignore so can’t have a dialogue with the Special person op. Only way I trade out of 20 is if I’m landing a 2022 first rounder like what the pack did a few years ago. Pace is too stupid to do that and is more likely trading up squandering picks for a player no team was targeting

 

[WindyCity]

Perhaps someone like Darrisaw?

If Darrisaw is there they should just pick him.

 

[Briggs is GOAT]

If Darrisaw is there they should just pick him.

I agree, but my question was would Darrisaw generate enough interest for someone to move up? I would just pick him, but let's say pace didn't want him, maybe that would make the trade down option available.

 

[dabears70]

Perhaps someone like Darrisaw?

Yeah i would think him or another OL and then some of the DB's or Edge Rushers. I mean there's a lot of players that could drop that another team has high on their list and is a team that only needs a player or two unlike the Bears who need multiple players.

 

[KittiesKorner]

 

[dentfan]

I think this is the best decision for the Bears in this draft because moving up as high as we would need to for a QB is just too costly. Now i wouldn't hate it but to get the 4th best QB is taking a huge risk especially knowing all QB's no matter where they're taken are huge risks.

Trade down scenarios.

Chicago Bears 2021 NFL Draft: Ideal Round 1 trade-back scenarios

If the Chicago Bears truly wanted to maximize the 2021 NFL Draft, they would opt for one of these first round trade-back scenarios.

email.fansided.com

Trade out of 1st round scenarios.

Chicago Bears NFL Draft 2021: 5 scenarios trading out of the first

If the Chicago Bears wanted to maximize value in the 2021 NFL Draft, they could opt for one of these scenarios and trade out of the first round.

email.fansided.com

The trade with the Balt, Raiders and Dolphins would be tough to turn down.

I would be okay with virtually every one of those scenarios. We pick up picks and fill the cupboard.

It’s nice to not see the trade it all for qb 5 crap. Wth possibly 6 qbs going in the first, trading back and picking up 2nd rounders will net us a few talents that should have gone in the firs —especially if Farley falls because of his back!

 

[playthrough2001]

Who are people moving up to 20 for? I am not sure the pick is going to generate a ton of interest.

If they cannot land a QB early in round 1... I am fine with a move down if it is available, but I am not sure I see it happening.

One of the top edge players could be there or Horn or Farley.

 

[dabears70]

One of the top edge players could be there or Horn or Farley.

Horn's my favorite CB in this draft so if he's there i hope they stay at #20 and take him unless they're offered a sweet deal.

 

[HeHateMe]

Yeah i would think him or another OL and then some of the DB's or Edge Rushers. I mean there's a lot of players that could drop that another team has high on their list and is a team that only needs a player or two unlike the Bears who need multiple players.

So you're saying that the bears will have multiple players at 20 that all would fill a need for the Bears, because their needs are many, and the players at 20 might even be a steal, so the bears should just trade back and not pick any of them?

 

[KittiesKorner]

So you're saying that the bears will have multiple players at 20 that all would fill a need for the Bears, because their needs are many, and the players at 20 might even be a steal, so the bears should just trade back and not pick any of them?

 

[HeHateMe]

@dabears70 has me on ignore as well. Is there anyone NOT on his ignore list that can tell him this idea is stupid, and every time he posts in this thread he made condoning this idea, works to further emphasize how stupid the idea js?