Ben Gordon a Finalist For Kennedy Award

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Corporations arent people

EDIT: Move this, no idea how it ended up in hawk talk.





http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100821/ap_ ... _finance_9





What do you guys think of this? Personally I don't think corporations should be allowed to contribute to campaign funds PERIOD. That is too much power in the hands of too few. Especially considering they "arent people" If a CEO wants to contribute money out of his own pocket, fine.





I don't pretend to know everything about it. There's alot of things I don't agree with Obama on, but this is one time I think I have to, how could opposing this be a bad thing? I mean unions generally vote democract, and corporations love themselves some replublican so in this respect, I think opposing the supreme court ruling would be an attempt at limiting the power of corporations and unions, thus putting more power into the hands of individuals.
 

JOVE23

New member
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
2,458
Liked Posts:
0
Re: Corporations arent people

Corporations are people:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Nati ... ._Bellotti



First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that corporations had a First Amendment right to make contributions in order to attempt to influence political processes. In his opinion, Justice Lewis Powell ruled that a Massachusetts criminal statute prohibiting the expenditure of corporate funds "for the purpose of ... influencing or affecting" voters' opinions infringed on corporations' "protected speech in a manner unjustified by a compelling state interest."
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Re: Corporations arent people

Corporations are not people, but they are groups of people. Who is to tell a group of people who they can and cannot donate money to? The "corporation" has to pass whatever they do through the board (and shareholders often times). I am not saying I think the votes are alway unanimous, just that a "corporation" can't do anything at all. It is the people who make up that corporation who are the ones making decisions.



If I incorporated my business as an LLC (employs one person--me) I would still have the right to donate money to whoever I wanted. Why should it be different if the corporation has 5000 employees?
 

jakobeast

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,903
Liked Posts:
21
Location:
yer ma's pants
Re: Corporations arent people

No. Corporations are not people. Corporations should not donate to a political party. It walks a fine line if you ask me of trying to buy a politician. I know it isn't, but it looks like it is imo.



How about smart finance reform? How about it shouldn't take millions of dollars to run for office?
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jakobeast"]No. Corporations are not people. Corporations should not donate to a political party. It walks a fine line if you ask me of trying to buy a politician. I know it isn't, but it looks like it is imo.



That's the job of the lobbyists who pay the politicians directly.



How about smart finance reform? How about it shouldn't take millions of dollars to run for office?[/quote]



Best suggestion I have heard in awhile.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jaxhawksfan"]Corporations are not people, but they are groups of people. Who is to tell a group of people who they can and cannot donate money to? The "corporation" has to pass whatever they do through the board (and shareholders often times). I am not saying I think the votes are alway unanimous, just that a "corporation" can't do anything at all. It is the people who make up that corporation who are the ones making decisions.



If I incorporated my business as an LLC (employs one person--me) I would still have the right to donate money to whoever I wanted. Why should it be different if the corporation has 5000 employees?[/quote]









[quote name="jaxhawksfan"]



Best suggestion I have heard in awhile.[/quote]





It shouldn't it does simply because thats how much money they can generate.



your example of you being the one and only employee in an LLC, is a terrible example. you are essentially implying it is the same as for example, the company I work for, which shall remain nameless which is a multi-national multi-billion dollar corporation, with 150k employees world wide.



any money you make as a one man operation is yours as an individual, so you have every right to donate it to whoever the hell you want.



I dont care if all the upper strata in a company donate their OWN money to whoever the hell they want. the fact is every employee that generates money for a large corporation DOES NOT get a say in where that political money goes.



I already said I have no problem if the individuals in a company want to donate, feel free. I dont care if the decisions on a donation go through a board, they are all about the bottom line, what is this politician going to do for me that is going to make this company richer.



And they are able to give more money, it would be fine, but I still wouldnt like it, if they honestly were all over the place on their political views, but they aren't lets be honest here, most if not all big business has a hard on for the republican party, and I think that is why you are ultimately ok with it if the roles were reversed, you would be up in arms. I simply don't like the idea of such political financial power being in the hands of so few.



Secondly, shareholders dont get a say in shit. My company gives out tons of political donations, all over the damn world, I dont ever recall getting the memo asking me who i would like to support. Despite the fact I have personally generated millions in revenue for them.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Re: Corporations arent people

Sorry you work so hard, have made so much money for the comany and haven't gotten your pay or a pat on the back from them. If you hate companies so much I suggest you do something about it and quit your fucking job. Work for yourself. Or do you only hate what they do, but you willl still gladly do the work for them and take their money? That's like saying "I hate automobiles because they kill so many people" and yet you get your paycheck from GM. I'm so damn sick of the "I work so fucking hard for a company and yet they make all the money and I don't get shit" mentality.
 

JOVE23

New member
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
2,458
Liked Posts:
0
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jakobeast"]No. Corporations are not people.[/quote]

The law of the land says different.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jaxhawksfan"]Sorry you work so hard, have made so much money for the comany and haven't gotten your pay or a pat on the back from them. If you hate companies so much I suggest you do something about it and quit your fucking job. Work for yourself. Or do you only hate what they do, but you willl still gladly do the work for them and take their money? That's like saying "I hate automobiles because they kill so many people" and yet you get your paycheck from GM. I'm so damn sick of the "I work so fucking hard for a company and yet they make all the money and I don't get shit" mentality.[/quote]





Rage much? You just went on a tangent responding to points I never made.



I never said I didnt get paid adequately, I never said I hate corporations. PLEEAAASEE quote me if I said otherwise.



I dont like corporations having political power thats all I said. My referenece to my companies policies with political donation's were in response to you saying shareholders get a say in where that political money goes, and I just said I never get the memo, and I'm pretty sure its like that with most companies. I am a shareholder in my company, and we get emails all the time during elections about donating to candidate x y z for X reason. They never ask for our input. I was just outlining a point, I never said I hated my company, never said they don't compensate me well. you just went off the wall responding to phantom arguments.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Re: Corporations arent people

"And they are able to give more money, it would be fine, but I still wouldnt like it, if they honestly were all over the place on their political views, but they aren't lets be honest here, most if not all big business has a hard on for the republican party, and I think that is why you are ultimately ok with it if the roles were reversed, you would be up in arms. I simply don't like the idea of such political financial power being in the hands of so few.



Secondly, shareholders dont get a say in shit. My company gives out tons of political donations, all over the damn world, I dont ever recall getting the memo asking me who i would like to support. Despite the fact I have personally generated millions in revenue for them"



Ok, I'll paraphrase again:

Point 1......If the company held your views you wouldn't have a problem with it at all, or at least they could spread it out so that all candidates from both parties get money. As long as the evil Republicans don't get any then it is all ok right? I have news for you: both the Republicans and Democrats get money and they both suck. Neither give a shit about the country. I don't know why you think I am a cheerleader for the fucking Republican party. I have said over and over again that I am Independent.

Point 2......In case you have never looked, the "power" of voting is usually held by the "few" and not the majority because the majority don't vote, don't donate, and don't really give a shit. As far as companies go, are you trying to tell me that only the big companies donate to political parties? Do some more research and get back to me.

Point 3.......Just because you personally haven't gotten your say in your company doesn't mean shareholders in general don't get to tell the company what to do. They do it each and every day with their wallet. They also get ballots in the mail.

Point 4......Bitching about making millions in revenue for your company but they never ask you who you want to support sure as hell sounds like bitching about the company but gladly taking their money to me.



In summation you can't stand big business/corporations in general because they are "greedy" in your opinion and they only care about making money. That's not news. People start businesses to make money and they do that by providing products/services to others who will pay for it. If you wanna blame anyone, blame the people who buy the products or who work for the company. If neither group existed then the problem would be solved right? People wanna place all sorts of regulations and limitations all everyone but themselves. Righteous bullshit that is easy to say until it hits you in the wallet. You wanna change corporations: don't buy products/services from the ones you think are evil and don't work for them. If everyone did the same then there wouldn't be a problem. It is called the free market system. Problem lies in the fact that everyone doesn't agree on what is evil or not, and doesn't agree on how far they are willing to inconvenience themselves to stand up for what they think is right. In the end they just want everyone to play nice as long as it doesn't cost them anything personally.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jaxhawksfan"]"And they are able to give more money, it would be fine, but I still wouldnt like it, if they honestly were all over the place on their political views, but they aren't lets be honest here, most if not all big business has a hard on for the republican party, and I think that is why you are ultimately ok with it if the roles were reversed, you would be up in arms. I simply don't like the idea of such political financial power being in the hands of so few.



Secondly, shareholders dont get a say in shit. My company gives out tons of political donations, all over the damn world, I dont ever recall getting the memo asking me who i would like to support. Despite the fact I have personally generated millions in revenue for them"



Ok, I'll paraphrase again:

Point 1......If the company held your views you wouldn't have a problem with it at all, or at least they could spread it out so that all candidates from both parties get money. As long as the evil Republicans don't get any then it is all ok right? I have news for you: both the Republicans and Democrats get money and they both suck. Neither give a shit about the country. I don't know why you think I am a cheerleader for the fucking Republican party. I have said over and over again that I am Independent.

Point 2......In case you have never looked, the "power" of voting is usually held by the "few" and not the majority because the majority don't vote, don't donate, and don't really give a shit. As far as companies go, are you trying to tell me that only the big companies donate to political parties? Do some more research and get back to me.

Point 3.......Just because you personally haven't gotten your say in your company doesn't mean shareholders in general don't get to tell the company what to do. They do it each and every day with their wallet. They also get ballots in the mail.

Point 4......Bitching about making millions in revenue for your company but they never ask you who you want to support sure as hell sounds like bitching about the company but gladly taking their money to me.



In summation you can't stand big business/corporations in general because they are "greedy" in your opinion and they only care about making money. That's not news. People start businesses to make money and they do that by providing products/services to others who will pay for it. If you wanna blame anyone, blame the people who buy the products or who work for the company. If neither group existed then the problem would be solved right? People wanna place all sorts of regulations and limitations all everyone but themselves. Righteous bullshit that is easy to say until it hits you in the wallet. You wanna change corporations: don't buy products/services from the ones you think are evil and don't work for them. If everyone did the same then there wouldn't be a problem. It is called the free market system. Problem lies in the fact that everyone doesn't agree on what is evil or not, and doesn't agree on how far they are willing to inconvenience themselves to stand up for what they think is right. In the end they just want everyone to play nice as long as it doesn't cost them anything personally.[/quote]





Point 1......If the company held your views you wouldn't have a problem with it at all, or at least they could spread it out so that all candidates from both parties get money. As long as the evil Republicans don't get any then it is all ok right? I have news for you: both the Republicans and Democrats get money and they both suck. Neither give a shit about the country. I don't know why you think I am a cheerleader for the fucking Republican party. I have said over and over again that I am Independent.



There aren't any politicians that hold my views. So it doesn't really matter. I will yield this entire point as both of us imply intimate knowledge of our minds that neither of us can possibly know for sure.





Point 2......In case you have never looked, the "power" of voting is usually held by the "few" and not the majority because the majority don't vote, don't donate, and don't really give a shit. As far as companies go, are you trying to tell me that only the big companies donate to political parties? Do some more research and get back to me.



No I am not implying only large corporations donate. Big or small I don't think they should be able to, I was merely pointing out there is a big difference between a large multinational organization and a one man LLC, such as for example, non-american members of the board of directors that should really have no business influencing the american political process in any way. I don't disagree with the first part of this point at all.



Point 3.......Just because you personally haven't gotten your say in your company doesn't mean shareholders in general don't get to tell the company what to do. They do it each and every day with their wallet. They also get ballots in the mail.



Sure, like the target debacle alot of share holders were abandoning target because of their support of a political candidate that was against *** marriage. That is beside the point, I don't think corporations should be financing political candidates, even if I had a say I still wouldn't like it. Again, I don't think they are evil, they are doing what is best for the company, as makes sense. This isn't some company I merely hold stock in, I work for them and would not willingly hurt my company financially because I disagree with their political candidate, I like my job. Unless like some like really bad person was running for office and they supported that person. I am generally fiscally conservative as it is and generally don't have a problem with the candidates they back (which are usually conservatives), I still don't think its right. Any opportunity we have to remove power from the few, I think we should take that opportunity, whether "the many" decide to take advantage of that, is another discussion entirely.





Point 4......Bitching about making millions in revenue for your company but they never ask you who you want to support sure as hell sounds like bitching about the company but gladly taking their money to me.



I was merely making a point, I wouldn't like it even if I did get a say because I don't want any corporation to even have the option to "get a say" as I said, if those individuals want to give money and vote along the lines that is in the best interest for their business FINE AND DANDY.



and for the love of all things holy, find one person who works for someone else and doesn't have one or two things they don't like, It doesn't mean they hate the company, think their evil, etc etc etc. If someone finds the perfect job that they never ever have anything to complain about good for them, I doubt that would ever exist for me. I work for a damn software developer, I don't know what possible evil they could do, write a pornographic childrens video game? I don't know.





I am not going to even respond to the summary because you go on making assumptions again.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Re: Corporations arent people

I'm glad we had our debate. Take my extreme extrapolation out of it and we are almost saying the same things. We just have a tiny disagreement between whether it should be allowed or not. I said in the beginning that the money is given to lobbyists anyway, so what's the difference? Do you want them giving the money to a candidate or party out in the open or do you want them giving more money surreptitiously (a direct bribe) to lobbyists? I also said in response to Jako's post that in an ideal situation we wouldn't have candidates run campaigns that cost the amount they cost. The thing we agree upon is that the whole thing is messed up. It has been for a long time. We need to get Congress back to being a temporary job to "serve" the people instead of what it has become. Thanks for the debate.
 

winos5

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 19, 2013
Posts:
7,956
Liked Posts:
829
Location:
Wish You Were Here
Re: Corporations arent people

Anyone who believes that corporations/big buisness only contributes to Republicans is not paying attention...or is that only evil global bankers and the evil military/industrial complex?
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="jaxhawksfan"]I'm glad we had our debate. Take my extreme extrapolation out of it and we are almost saying the same things. We just have a tiny disagreement between whether it should be allowed or not. I said in the beginning that the money is given to lobbyists anyway, so what's the difference? Do you want them giving the money to a candidate or party out in the open or do you want them giving more money surreptitiously (a direct bribe) to lobbyists? I also said in response to Jako's post that in an ideal situation we wouldn't have candidates run campaigns that cost the amount they cost. The thing we agree upon is that the whole thing is messed up. It has been for a long time. We need to get Congress back to being a temporary job to "serve" the people instead of what it has become. Thanks for the debate.[/quote]



:clap:
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,676
Liked Posts:
3,046
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="Tater"]



:clap:[/quote]

Yeah. Good luck with that. Whenever there's an ounce of power to be had people will be dicking themselves over control of it. Good in theory, but it fails uner practice. Blame human nature.



Personally, I'd like to see all campain contributions made illegal and anyone involved in graft sent for at least 5 years in pound-me-in-the-ass prison--corporation or individual.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="LordKOTL"]

Yeah. Good luck with that. Whenever there's an ounce of power to be had people will be dicking themselves over control of it. Good in theory, but it fails uner practice. Blame human nature.



Personally, I'd like to see all campain contributions made illegal and anyone involved in graft sent for at least 5 years in pound-me-in-the-ass prison--corporation or individual.[/quote]





The only problem with nobody being allowed to contribute, is then rich people would be the only ones with personal resources in which to mount an election campaign, not that politics isnt already perpetuated by the rich and the elite.



As Jax said earlier I think term limits would solve the majority of the problems. A constant influx of new blood could eliminate longstanding political alliances and feuds and put politicians back on the track of serving the public instead of their own careers.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,843
Liked Posts:
2,550
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="TSD"]





The only problem with nobody being allowed to contribute, is then rich people would be the only ones with personal resources in which to mount an election campaign, not that politics isnt already perpetuated by the rich and the elite.



As Jax said earlier I think term limits would solve the majority of the problems. A constant influx of new blood could eliminate longstanding political alliances and feuds and put politicians back on the track of serving the public instead of their own careers.[/quote]

What's the difference, only the rich win elections anyway.
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="LordKOTL"]

Yeah. Good luck with that. Whenever there's an ounce of power to be had people will be dicking themselves over control of it. Good in theory, but it fails uner practice. Blame human nature.



Personally, I'd like to see all campain contributions made illegal and anyone involved in graft sent for at least 5 years in pound-me-in-the-ass prison--corporation or individual.[/quote]



That would work too.
 

BiscuitintheBasket

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,802
Liked Posts:
0
Re: Corporations arent people

[quote name="MassHavoc"]





What's the difference, only the rich win elections anyway.[/quote]





Exactly. Even if they are not the ones actually elected.





Also, one does not need a ton of money to mount a local campaign for a local office. There is more power at lower levels of gov't than many may believe. Especially when it comes to a large scheme (think outside of large city and federal level politics).
 

Top