Not a dime. As I said earlier, I love horse racing, used to own harness horses, know the rules, etc.
Here is a statement from the Country House's owner:
Complicating that discussion is that Maximum Security’s movements had no discernible impact on Country House’s trip. Though Mott said the interference compromised the chances of two other horses “dramatically,” he acknowledged that Country House may have been affected only "slightly."
But in conceding that point, Mott insisted that the horses hampered by Maximum Security — and all of the people who bet on them — were victims deserving of justice.
The thing that people are up in arms about is the fact that the interference had no direct impact on the eventual winner. This is true. No way Country House wins that race, even without the interference.
but that is not the rule
"If a leading horse or any other horse in a race swerves or is ridden to either side so as to interfere with, intimidate, or impede any other horse or jockey, or to cause the same result, this action shall be deemed a foul. ... If, in the opinion of the stewards, a foul alters the finish of a race, an offending horse may be disqualified by the stewards."
The judges made the right call. As I stated earlier, this was so close to becoming one of horse racing's worst days ever. It's a small miracle that horse didn't take out War of Will and cause a major pile up of horses and jockeys.