- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
:clap: Sharp at C!
Can snag a winger at a later date if necessary.
Or Stalberg in the top 6:clap: he's ranked our 4th LW after Sharp and Brunette
Or Stalberg in the top 6:clap: he's ranked our 4th LW after Sharp and Brunette
Or Stalberg in the top 6:clap: he's ranked our 4th LW after Sharp and Brunette
wow.
the honest love affair with a shit hockey player is quite amazing.
ok, why dont you guys give me a reason why he is this "shit player."
See this is why I never win the optimist of the year award
Plus your asking for some sort of actual analysis -imo along the lines of which might go in the baseball folders here -that so and so as a leadoff hitter blows, as he isn't going to hit 50 homers and drive in a 100 runs.... etc...
the one "try" I remember was whining about hockey players last year -as they were awful because they didn't bag a hat-trick per game during the season (or thereabouts).
---
As far as Cogliano goes - I wouldn't have seen him as an upgrade from Sharp at center -or Bolland for that matter (apparently Cogliano is a centre that can't win faceoffs).
I'm just curious to their opinions, if its because so and so doesn't get the hat trickora ointper game, then there is some serious issues
Or Stalberg in the top 6:clap: he's ranked our 4th LW after Sharp and Brunette
No response yet from anybody (shocker)
Icehog, I don't think he's shit, but he didn't show the ability to light the lamp with us at all. He's fast, he's got some size, and I think he's a decent get at 875 a year because he's still relatively young and has the potential to get something done, but to think he's an asset is a stretch. He doesn't produce.