TheStig
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 5, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,636
- Liked Posts:
- 38
J-Mart wrote:
Excellent post, BG is also a good system defender, he doesn't have the natural instincts that Kirk has but he is able to execute basic fundamentals and skills. BG is also our closest thing to a true SG and he is an elite shooter. Neither Kirk nor Salmons can truly fill those gaps as kirk is more of a point and Salmons is more of a 3 and I don't think he has the quickness to be a full time sg.I just don't think our team will have a better record next year if Gordon leaves assuming that we don't add anything significant and also assuming Deng keeps playing like crap. If we do it will be because of the additions of Miller and Salmons that we didn't have the first half of this year. There is no question in my mind that we would have a better record with Gordon than without Gordon. I am not confident with only Rose/Salmons being able to perform in the clutch, Rose obviously has had trouble in the past and without BG that makes it incredibly easy for the defense to know who is taking the shot. I am also skeptical of how long Salmons can continue this high level of play.
Gordon has shown that he is a work horse and IMO has improved almost every season. There is no question that his height/defense deficiencies are overblown and usually made by fans who don't consistently watch this team. I think strength is more important for good defense than height, and there is no question Gordon has the strength to be a little above average defender. As right now I would argue he is an average defender, which is a huge improvement from where he used to be. The fact of the matter is that Gordon is not hurting us on defense, it is our post defense that hurts us more. If we can address that I would be more than comfortable with Gordon on defense.
Gordon is extremely important to this team and the only way I wouldn't miss him is if we somehow traded for Amare or Bosh.