cbe 99

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
You'll find him criticised in pretty much all of the non-mainstream media, not just Bulls Podcasters. Blog a Bull and the comments section of Doug's blog are possibly even more brutal on Hinrich than you are Fred. :laugh:

Maybe the mainstream media is different, but the mainstream media is garbage in general, why should the sports section be any different? They're paid to write fluff pieces about how wonderful things are in Bulls land.
 

Basket-ball Smurf

New member
Joined:
Dec 1, 2009
Posts:
1
Liked Posts:
0
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Message to Fred and Mark -

1. You do not have to match salaries in a sign and trade if you are the under-cap.

2. The history of sign and trades is that the team losing the major player does not get anywhere near equal value in return.

http://www.blogabull.com/2010/3/4/1356662/recent-history-of-sign-and-trades

UNRESTRICTED FAs:

Hedo Turkoglu to the Raptors for a trade exception. The Raptors had cap space to sign him outright, but the Magic agreed to make it a sign-and-trade for nothing in order to land a trade exception.

Rashard Lewis to the Magic for a 2nd round pick. The Magic had the cap space to offer a 5-year max deal with Lewis, but Lewis wanted a 6th year, causing his S&T for a 2nd round pick.

Peja Stojakovic to the Hornets for a trade exception. The Hornets had plenty of cap space, but the Pacers didn't want to lose Peja for nothing. So they offered the Hornets $250k to persuade them to acquire Peja via sign-and trade instead, allowing them to get...

Al Harrington to the Pacers for a 1st round pick. The Pacers did not have cap space, but neither did any other option after the Bulls signed Ben Wallace and the Hornets traded for Peja. The Pacers though had their trade exception, making them "the only Harrington suitor that could complete a sign-and-trade without forcing Atlanta to take back significant salary." The Hawks were slashing salary after ownership issues, and the Pacers got Harrington for a 1st round pick.

Brad Miller to the Kings for Scott Pollard and a trade exception. This is the only example I could find of the "use other teams with cap space as leverage" idea posed by tyger and Mike McGraw. The Nuggets and Jazz had cap space and offered big contracts to Miller, but Miller wanted to join the contending, over the cap Kings, and the Pacers jumped at the trade instead of losing Miller for nothing.

Grant Hill to the Magic for Chucky Atkins and Ben Wallace. This goes far enough back where the details get a bit sketchy, but it looks like the Magic had enough cap room to sign two max FA's outright and agreed to a sign-and-trade to give Hill a 7-year max deal.

Tracy McGrady to the Magic for a 1st round pick. Sketchier again, as I can't remember or find out why McGrady was traded for so little despite being just a 3rd year player. I'm assuming he was unrestricted. The Magic had just brought in Hill and still had the cap room to sign McGrady, and they again agreed to S&T to give McGrady the full 7-year contract.


RESTRICTED FAs:

Restricted FAs require sign-and-trades if the acquiring team wants to avoid the offer sheet process, so their cost has been higher.

Joe Johnson to the Hawks for Boris Diaw and two 1sts. The Hawks had the cap space for Johnson's 5-year, $70 mil deal. The Suns were considering matching the offer (JJ was a restricted FA), but chose to honor Johnson's wish and let him walk in exchange for Diaw and two 1sts.

Eddy Curry to the Knicks for a 1st and a right to swap another 1st. Bulls had the right to match any offer, the Knicks wanted him, so he was swapped essentially for what became Tyrus and Noah. The Knicks were above the cap when this happened.

Kenyon Martin to the Nuggets for three 1st round picks. The Nuggets had the cap space for a max deal, but because Martin was restricted, they paid the Nets 3 first-round picks as compensation.

3. If Bosh decides he wants to come to Chicago, Toronto has no leverage. They would be better off getting a trade exception than taking on a contract

I usually agree with you Fred, but you are dead wrong about sign and trades.
 

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Nice post Basket-ball Smurf & welcome to the forums. I just started a new thread for the new CBE , you should post this in there. Fred was pretty out there this episode.
 

JimmyBulls

New member
Joined:
Apr 3, 2009
Posts:
491
Liked Posts:
0
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

I agree that Bosh will probably end up with the Lakers. Personally, I think the Lakers will end up shipping Bynum and Walton to Toronto for Bosh. I don't think they can do much better than a Bargs/Bynum combo long-term, and Bosh is just too good to pass up if you're the Lakers relying on a aging Kobe to carry the team.
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Basket-ball Smurf wrote:
Message to Fred and Mark -

1. You do not have to match salaries in a sign and trade if you are the under-cap.

2. The history of sign and trades is that the team losing the major player does not get anywhere near equal value in return.

http://www.blogabull.com/2010/3/4/1356662/recent-history-of-sign-and-trades

UNRESTRICTED FAs:

Hedo Turkoglu to the Raptors for a trade exception. The Raptors had cap space to sign him outright, but the Magic agreed to make it a sign-and-trade for nothing in order to land a trade exception.

Rashard Lewis to the Magic for a 2nd round pick. The Magic had the cap space to offer a 5-year max deal with Lewis, but Lewis wanted a 6th year, causing his S&T for a 2nd round pick.

Peja Stojakovic to the Hornets for a trade exception. The Hornets had plenty of cap space, but the Pacers didn't want to lose Peja for nothing. So they offered the Hornets $250k to persuade them to acquire Peja via sign-and trade instead, allowing them to get...

Al Harrington to the Pacers for a 1st round pick. The Pacers did not have cap space, but neither did any other option after the Bulls signed Ben Wallace and the Hornets traded for Peja. The Pacers though had their trade exception, making them "the only Harrington suitor that could complete a sign-and-trade without forcing Atlanta to take back significant salary." The Hawks were slashing salary after ownership issues, and the Pacers got Harrington for a 1st round pick.

Brad Miller to the Kings for Scott Pollard and a trade exception. This is the only example I could find of the "use other teams with cap space as leverage" idea posed by tyger and Mike McGraw. The Nuggets and Jazz had cap space and offered big contracts to Miller, but Miller wanted to join the contending, over the cap Kings, and the Pacers jumped at the trade instead of losing Miller for nothing.

Grant Hill to the Magic for Chucky Atkins and Ben Wallace. This goes far enough back where the details get a bit sketchy, but it looks like the Magic had enough cap room to sign two max FA's outright and agreed to a sign-and-trade to give Hill a 7-year max deal.

Tracy McGrady to the Magic for a 1st round pick. Sketchier again, as I can't remember or find out why McGrady was traded for so little despite being just a 3rd year player. I'm assuming he was unrestricted. The Magic had just brought in Hill and still had the cap room to sign McGrady, and they again agreed to S&T to give McGrady the full 7-year contract.


RESTRICTED FAs:

Restricted FAs require sign-and-trades if the acquiring team wants to avoid the offer sheet process, so their cost has been higher.

Joe Johnson to the Hawks for Boris Diaw and two 1sts. The Hawks had the cap space for Johnson's 5-year, $70 mil deal. The Suns were considering matching the offer (JJ was a restricted FA), but chose to honor Johnson's wish and let him walk in exchange for Diaw and two 1sts.

Eddy Curry to the Knicks for a 1st and a right to swap another 1st. Bulls had the right to match any offer, the Knicks wanted him, so he was swapped essentially for what became Tyrus and Noah. The Knicks were above the cap when this happened.

Kenyon Martin to the Nuggets for three 1st round picks. The Nuggets had the cap space for a max deal, but because Martin was restricted, they paid the Nets 3 first-round picks as compensation.

3. If Bosh decides he wants to come to Chicago, Toronto has no leverage. They would be better off getting a trade exception than taking on a contract

I usually agree with you Fred, but you are dead wrong about sign and trades.

I never disagreed with your #1 and #2. I completely disagree that you're better off getting nothing in return. I was referring to value of what the Bulls are willing to depart with if Bosh demands a sign and trade. If you were the Raptors, would you rather trade Bosh for Gasol, or Bosh for Hinrich and Deng? (I can't believe I'm even posing this question.) Or would you rather let him walk for cap space. If you were in the Toronto fan base, letting a player of Bosh's caliber would be hard to stomach for nothing.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Fred wrote:
Basket-ball Smurf wrote:
Message to Fred and Mark -

1. You do not have to match salaries in a sign and trade if you are the under-cap.

2. The history of sign and trades is that the team losing the major player does not get anywhere near equal value in return.

http://www.blogabull.com/2010/3/4/1356662/recent-history-of-sign-and-trades

UNRESTRICTED FAs:

Hedo Turkoglu to the Raptors for a trade exception. The Raptors had cap space to sign him outright, but the Magic agreed to make it a sign-and-trade for nothing in order to land a trade exception.

Rashard Lewis to the Magic for a 2nd round pick. The Magic had the cap space to offer a 5-year max deal with Lewis, but Lewis wanted a 6th year, causing his S&T for a 2nd round pick.

Peja Stojakovic to the Hornets for a trade exception. The Hornets had plenty of cap space, but the Pacers didn't want to lose Peja for nothing. So they offered the Hornets $250k to persuade them to acquire Peja via sign-and trade instead, allowing them to get...

Al Harrington to the Pacers for a 1st round pick. The Pacers did not have cap space, but neither did any other option after the Bulls signed Ben Wallace and the Hornets traded for Peja. The Pacers though had their trade exception, making them "the only Harrington suitor that could complete a sign-and-trade without forcing Atlanta to take back significant salary." The Hawks were slashing salary after ownership issues, and the Pacers got Harrington for a 1st round pick.

Brad Miller to the Kings for Scott Pollard and a trade exception. This is the only example I could find of the "use other teams with cap space as leverage" idea posed by tyger and Mike McGraw. The Nuggets and Jazz had cap space and offered big contracts to Miller, but Miller wanted to join the contending, over the cap Kings, and the Pacers jumped at the trade instead of losing Miller for nothing.

Grant Hill to the Magic for Chucky Atkins and Ben Wallace. This goes far enough back where the details get a bit sketchy, but it looks like the Magic had enough cap room to sign two max FA's outright and agreed to a sign-and-trade to give Hill a 7-year max deal.

Tracy McGrady to the Magic for a 1st round pick. Sketchier again, as I can't remember or find out why McGrady was traded for so little despite being just a 3rd year player. I'm assuming he was unrestricted. The Magic had just brought in Hill and still had the cap room to sign McGrady, and they again agreed to S&T to give McGrady the full 7-year contract.


RESTRICTED FAs:

Restricted FAs require sign-and-trades if the acquiring team wants to avoid the offer sheet process, so their cost has been higher.

Joe Johnson to the Hawks for Boris Diaw and two 1sts. The Hawks had the cap space for Johnson's 5-year, $70 mil deal. The Suns were considering matching the offer (JJ was a restricted FA), but chose to honor Johnson's wish and let him walk in exchange for Diaw and two 1sts.

Eddy Curry to the Knicks for a 1st and a right to swap another 1st. Bulls had the right to match any offer, the Knicks wanted him, so he was swapped essentially for what became Tyrus and Noah. The Knicks were above the cap when this happened.

Kenyon Martin to the Nuggets for three 1st round picks. The Nuggets had the cap space for a max deal, but because Martin was restricted, they paid the Nets 3 first-round picks as compensation.

3. If Bosh decides he wants to come to Chicago, Toronto has no leverage. They would be better off getting a trade exception than taking on a contract

I usually agree with you Fred, but you are dead wrong about sign and trades.

I never disagreed with your #1 and #2. I completely disagree that you're better off getting nothing in return. I was referring to value of what the Bulls are willing to depart with if Bosh demands a sign and trade. If you were the Raptors, would you rather trade Bosh for Gasol, or Bosh for Hinrich and Deng? (I can't believe I'm even posing this question.) Or would you rather let him walk for cap space. If you were in the Toronto fan base, letting a player of Bosh's caliber would be hard to stomach for nothing.
The answer is obviously S&T for Gasol because he's a far better player than Hinrich and Deng, both of whom play positions the Raptors don't need to fill.
 

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Fred wrote:
If you were in the Toronto fan base, letting a player of Bosh's caliber would be hard to stomach for nothing.

Stop pretending like Canadians care about basketball cuz they don't. If they did, Steve Nash, Rick Fox, Jamaal Magloire, Todd MacCullough, & Bill Wennington wouldn't be their only quality NBA exports. The only reason people show up to Raps games is they either 1) thought it was a Maple Leafs game that night, 2) thought it was the Curling Championships, or 3) were so wasted on Lebatt they thought it would be a good idea to go to a game.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Diddy1122 wrote:
Stop pretending like Canadians care about basketball cuz they don't.

If Canadians don't care about basketball why does the Raptors forum on realgm have as many posts as the Knicks and Bulls forums combined?
 

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Shakes wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
Stop pretending like Canadians care about basketball cuz they don't.

If Canadians don't care about basketball why does the Raptors forum on realgm have as many posts as the Knicks and Bulls forums combined?

Because Canadians like to blog...duh. If you lived in North America, you'd know that. :p
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Re:cbe 99.412.34.

Diddy1122 wrote:
Shakes wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
Stop pretending like Canadians care about basketball cuz they don't.

If Canadians don't care about basketball why does the Raptors forum on realgm have as many posts as the Knicks and Bulls forums combined?

Because Canadians like to blog...duh. If you lived in North America, you'd know that. :p

Maybe that's true, Raptors attendance is down more than the rest of the league this year, maybe they only like writing about their team.
 

Top