- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...ty-ryan-suter-stanley-cup-champion-blackhawks
:yeah:
2009-10 Blackhawks <3
:yeah:
2009-10 Blackhawks <3
proceeds benefiting the Ronald McDonald House near Lurie Children’s Hospital.
the championship hawks team is going to be like the 85 bears team.....fans never let go.
this charity game is stupid.
I got tix today. great seats for $30 and twice as close to me as the UC! Im pumped. Added bonus it supports charity. Just cant believe its not more popular. oh well. still a week left to sell more tix.
It's an exhibition, there is nothing stupid about it being done. And benefiting a charity is so terrible, right.
1) See Iagos post
2) Charity=(someone is making a profit)
Do you honestly think that charities are 100% as advertised? if you do you will get a swift kick in the nuts in the real world.
http://www.familyguyepisodes.tv/family_guy_season_6_episode_8_mcstroke.htmlI can only speak for myself and I don't care. It's a meaningless game for a charity that is run by a company that provides poison for people. The people the charity helps often become indebted for their help and buy more garbage from said company and perpetuates illness. Whatevs.
Haha I mean common. Kinda a ridiculous response to what jntg said...bcuz he really needed to be lectured.
Ronald McDonald House is a pretty damn reputable charity. Iago seems to have issues more so with McDonalds and isn't a fan of the charity because of it...the charity isn't about the "poison". At least that was my impression of his post.
This is a fun hockey game for a good cause. Could be doing a whole lot worse.
It doesnt matter the reputation of the charity. A charity like this isnt in its right to be specifically benefiting the charity and the charity only, others have to benefit as well. There is PR for both Mcdonalds and for the hawks as well on a smaller scale hockey, there is also a % of money that goes directly into peoples pockets...along with free advertising or should I say cheaper. I know a thing or two about this topic, not my first rodeo...but you can be naive and think its "a good cause"
Thanks for your concern about JNTG and being lectured. carry on.
the championship hawks team is going to be like the 85 bears team.....fans never let go.
this charity game is stupid.
1) See Iagos post
2) Charity=(someone is making a profit)
Do you honestly think that charities are 100% as advertised? if you do you will get a swift kick in the nuts in the real world.
You act like this money is going to go to terrorism. It is going to a good cause. Just about every reputable charity works like the Ronald McDonald house. In the end there are definitely people that will be helped because of the charity and because of this game. It is a good cause, saying otherwise is just plain dumb. It isn't in it's right? Ha! Why don't you pass the bar and run multiple businesses and then you can talk about charities. Pretty bad ass...
:rofl: lol!
If you believe that charities are there for the sole purpose of "helping" and that making a profit isnt an agenda of corps than you my lil buddy are one big flopping pile of idiot.
make sure to click the red exclamation mark and click report, than say that "you are here to talk about hockey"......tool.
haha no shit that they need to make a profit. They need to pay a board of directors. They need to pay the employees. They obviously have people who volunteer and help out as well. No one has said differently. Everyone knows how charities work. Everyone knows what "proceeds" means.
In the end, this is a charity that helps out with a good cause. When you donate, you are helping that cause. You are helping build facilities and provide meals to families who have ill children. It helps a good cause.
As I said earlier, "Just about every reputable charity works like the Ronald McDonald house. In the end there are definitely people that will be helped because of the charity and because of this game." So please explain how this statement is wrong...you argue just to argue. You use the word "sole purpose" and no one has ever said that...you make up arguments in your head that aren't even there.
Mid 30s...what a loser.