Chiefs Trading Tyreek Hill to Dolphins

pseudonym

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
7,059
Liked Posts:
4,479
Location:
Chicago
We totally should not do this. The ONLY thing that makes me pause for a second is that Fields has a GREAT deep ball. But we can't give up two 1sts and a 2nd for him. Nope.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,087
Liked Posts:
4,266
Very high chance this plays out the way Odell Beckham Jr. did in Cleveland.
 
Joined:
Aug 6, 2020
Posts:
2,011
Liked Posts:
2,897
He did have one really good year before Mahomes (and a solid rookie year) became the starter but three of his four best years have been with Mahomes. Anyway, I totally agree that he's unlikely worth the investment.
Well yeah, that's because he had just entered the league and continued to get better. By year 3, Mahomes was his QB. I'm sure he'd have improved in year 3, 4, etc. with or w/out him.

It's interesting Chiefs have tried to add players to replace him in the future (now), i.e. Robinson, Pringle, et.c. and they're gone the same year they're about to lose Hill.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
19,463
Liked Posts:
18,099
Location:
MICHIGAN
I would love to have hill a bear but I would hate to lose two 1st to do it. Our oline is a mess and we are switching defenses. We need every pick we can get
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,072
Liked Posts:
1,298
It’s tough watching other teams surround their young QB with a bunch of talent while fields has a bunch of special teamers to throw too…
The Chiefs are unsurrounding their team with talent. Your logic is incredibly flawed. WHen you have an elite QB you don't pay a receiver elite money. GB and KC are proving this.
 

Spitta Andretti

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,792
Liked Posts:
14,400
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Is it tough watching teams like the Packers and Chiefs lose their stud WRs? Your logic is incredibly flawed
 

The Doctor

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
850
Liked Posts:
639
Location:
Going where the weather suits my clothes
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
I was just listening to Mike Florio on the SCORE with Bernstein and he was saying that this is Hill's last chance to grab a big contract. The Chiefs don't want to pay him Adams money so - trade.
IMO, as far as Hill is concerned, he's not going somewhere to win, he's going for the money. And if the Jets and/or the Phins want to give it to him so be it, as long as it's not the Bears.
 
Last edited:

Bear_Assed

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,930
Liked Posts:
2,713
The Chiefs are unsurrounding their team with talent. Your logic is incredibly flawed. WHen you have an elite QB you don't pay a receiver elite money. GB and KC are proving this.
What are you taking about? My logic is “surround young QBs with talent” Mahomes is no longer a young QB, he’s a vet. Rodgers isn’t been a young qb in years.

What are you talking about? I’m having a hard time keeping up with the stupidity on here.

Why is everyone so upset I’m concerned with the lack of weapons for Fields in his second year after a rough first year? Just because you root for the bears and Poles is new (not pace) doesn’t mean you have agree with everything he does or doesn’t do. You can have an original opinion, thought or idea too. It’s OK.
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,072
Liked Posts:
1,298
What are you taking about? My logic is “surround young QBs with talen” Mahomes is no longer a young QB, he’s a vet. Rodgers isn’t been a young qb in years.

What are you talking about?
You surround a young QB with talent if you think your young QB needs it, AND your cap space and draft capital allows it. The Bears don't have that luxury right now.
 

The Doctor

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
850
Liked Posts:
639
Location:
Going where the weather suits my clothes
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
Where do you see the word 'young' in his post?
In fairness I think the OP was referencing his own post about surrounding a young QB with talent. While I think he may have been talking about WR talent, for my money, I would prefer Poles gives Fields a better o-line. With more time to throw I believe Fields can make whatever wideout he has better.
 

Bear_Assed

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,930
Liked Posts:
2,713
You surround a young QB with talent if you think your young QB needs it, AND your cap space and draft capital allows it. The Bears don't have that luxury right now.
Lol bears have plenty of cap space and could have traded for Woods for a 6th. Yes he’s coming off injury but so was the DT we signed for $45 million on day 1
 

90sBullsFan

Member
Joined:
May 6, 2021
Posts:
89
Liked Posts:
92
Location:
Twin Cities, MN
My favorite teams
  1. Minnesota Timberwolves
  1. Minnesota Wild
  1. Northern Iowa Panthers
As a Chiefs fan, you hate to lose one of your "big guns" on offense, but damn, if they could get anything close to what they're looking for in return for a late 20s receiver whose game is based on speed and being in insane shape, you've got to take it. The WR market is ridiculous right now, with guys getting paid in the high $20 millions. KC's gotta make this deal, get some good draft capital back, and get a high WR draft pick on a rookie contract so those millions can be spent elsewhere (defense!).
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,072
Liked Posts:
1,298
Lol bears have plenty of cap space and could have traded for Woods for a 6th. Yes he’s coming off injury but so was the DT we signed for $45 million on day 1
We don't have enough cap to get a stud WR and get all other positions filled. We signed a DT, because you only start one DT. But at receiver you need at least 3-4. This is pretty basic math, logic and algebra.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,994
Liked Posts:
7,759
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
As a Chiefs fan, you hate to lose one of your "big guns" on offense, but damn, if they could get anything close to what they're looking for in return for a late 20s receiver whose game is based on speed and being in insane shape, you've got to take it. The WR market is ridiculous right now, with guys getting paid in the high $20 millions. KC's gotta make this deal, get some good draft capital back, and get a high WR draft pick on a rookie contract so those millions can be spent elsewhere (defense!).
Not that I’m disagreeing with you but the Chiefs are in win now mode. I think losing Hill and filling his shoes with a rookie decreases their ability to compete quite significantly. Beside Mahomes, the offense moves through him. JuJu and a rookie likely won’t make up for losing Hill.
 

Top