Montucky
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 21, 2020
- Posts:
- 9,520
- Liked Posts:
- 4,014
I don't think it's a high probability transaction. It feels like one of those moves that go in someone's 'mock offseason' where everyone nods and says 'that's smart' without thinking how improbable it really is.
On paper as a Bears fan it makes perfect sense. The Bears essentially throw the tag on Robinson just so they can get something for him. It seems like such an obvious value creating solution that every team should do it if they have a valued pending FA and are not using the tag, right?
So, then why doesn't it happen more? The logic of 'why' the tag-and-trade should happen doesn't map over to teams actually doing it.
These days it happens every off-season. Again, you are working with an outdated premise that this is a rare occurrence. Its not. Not anymore
I have repeatedly explained why the Ravens require a wide receiver of exactly Allen Robinson II's profile. He would also be immensely helpful to the Dolphins. Seeing as wide receiver is a position where five of them can be on the field at once a few teams may surprise you with their interest.I have yet to see someone make a compelling case why a WR needy team would choose making Robinson one of the highest paid WRs AND give up draft capital over other FA WRs or drafting someone. At this time you are only looking at things from the Bears point of view where they get picks for a player who's currently not under contract.
And again, the tag-and-trade is an off-season ritual at this point. We haven't gone a year without it since 2017. When you say its not going to happen you're the one arguing against history.