Kush77
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 15, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,096
- Liked Posts:
- 151
Harper was still a beast on defense man. Like I said, he, Scottie, and Michael all could cover 3 positions (at least) between the 3 of them. All were incredibily long, tall, quick, scrappy, and on-ball guys.
That 1995 year was really the one season that the Bulls were out-of-sync from 1989-1999... They just lost Horace Grant and Scott Williams... they had NOBODY in the low-post... besides Pippen and Jordan (after he finally came back with 18 games left to play in the regular season).
Harper wasn't to blame for that year... the Bulls just run out of gas, and it is apparent if you watch that ORL Semi Final series...
I did watch the Orlando series, every minute of it. They lost to a better team, I don't think it was about running out of gas. And I don't blame Harper for the playoffs, because he never played. When MJ came back in 1995, Harper was on the bench and rarely left. Harper only played 40 min. in 6 games in the 95 playoffs, so I'm not blaming him for what happened vs. Orlando. I blame Harp for his poor play during the entire 1994-1995 regular season.
We still had BJ at the point and Jordan. And Harper played so poorly up until that point, it was easy for Phil to bench him. Harper's career with the Bulls was saved by Michael Jordan. Once Armstrong left, the Bulls put Harper at the point since the Bulls' offense never needed a true point guard. And it worked out.
I know the Bulls suffered from the loss of their two PFs, but that had nothing to do with how poorly Ron Harper played. He was given a big contract, for the time, something like 5 years 24 mil. and he didn't live up to it at all.
Harp averaged 6.9 ppg and shot 42% in 94-95, and he was the second highest paid player on the team after Kukoc I believe. Harper's signing would have been a 100% disaster if MJ had not come back.
As for his defense, he was asked to guard a lot of PG and he did a good job.
But when it comes to the career of Bulls' PG - the Chicago Bulls career specifically, I would take Norm Van Lier over Harper and Hinrich.
Norm was a 3-time all star with the Bulls. I know you said it's subjective, but he made it three times. Hinrich never came close to making an all-star team. But the stats you posted do show that they are pretty much the same scoring/shooting wise.