- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 48,208
- Liked Posts:
- 37,136
- Location:
- Chicago
I agree it was always about a FA RT
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,603
- Liked Posts:
- 7,367
So the chiefs are happy to pay him top dollar 2x years in a row, but you the CCS genius and PFF guru happen to know more than their GM lol. Got it. If they end up signing him to a long term contract will you eat a shoe or something? Or maybe just for once admit you were wrong?
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,792
- Liked Posts:
- 14,400
My favorite teams
maxhatter
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Feb 14, 2020
- Posts:
- 678
- Liked Posts:
- 737
I don't think the Chiefs tagging Brown (if they do) doesn't really come as a huge surprise. I don't think losing Brown has any effect on the right tackle market which is where I believe the Bears are going to target.
napo55
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 24, 2016
- Posts:
- 2,391
- Liked Posts:
- 1,594
The rest of the league disagrees with you. We'll see 'll see if Sanborn can avoid being exposed for his lack of speed ---If he's able to stay healthy for more than a few games.
And the question remains: will there be quality players forPoles to spend all that cap space on?
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,722
- Liked Posts:
- 38,019
- Location:
- Cumming
Lmao, I know that he has enough money to not spend $20million on an off-ball linebacker that disappears in the playoffs
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,603
- Liked Posts:
- 7,367
Just what, top 5 market value or is it top 10? Also there’s a penalty for back to back tags making it more expensive. I get it’s not a long term investment but it’s a very expensive 1 year deal. Also, you typically don’t tag ‘bad’ players which is something some people are claiming here that he is average at best due to his PFF pressures allowed stat.
I saw him do pretty well against the eagles. He didn’t seem to have any problems in the playoffs ??
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,722
- Liked Posts:
- 38,019
- Location:
- Cumming
He had a crappy season the 1st half and really turned it on late, especially the playoffs.Just what, top 5 market value or is it top 10? Also there’s a penalty for back to back tags making it more expensive. I get it’s not a long term investment but it’s a very expensive 1 year deal. Also, you typically don’t tag ‘bad’ players which is something some people are claiming here that he is average at best due to his PFF pressures allowed stat.
I saw him do pretty well against the eagles. He didn’t seem to have any problems in the playoffs ??
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,412
- Liked Posts:
- 7,609
Because he will cost under 20 million and he fits KC's scheme, not the Bears'.
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,412
- Liked Posts:
- 7,609
So ... he should start drinking alcohol again?
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,603
- Liked Posts:
- 7,367
What system is that? Being able to pass block??
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,603
- Liked Posts:
- 7,367
Sure but the guy is now a 4x pro bowler. Acting like bad half of 1 season all the sudden defines the player. There is a reason they franchised him the year prior. There’s a reason they brought him in the first place.
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,412
- Liked Posts:
- 7,609
Outside zone.
Look at how often Jones was way to his left, blocking moving targets. Now imagine Brown trying to do that.
You can't sign or draft good players if they do not fit your scheme.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,792
- Liked Posts:
- 14,400
My favorite teams
And there is also a reason they haven't signed him long term. He probably wants way more than what they're willing to give for him
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 64,704
- Liked Posts:
- 41,444
I don't recall making any claims about knowing more than them. I stated two things that are true at the moment. It appears they don't want to give him a long term deal and he led the NFL in pressures given up. So what am I admitting I am wrong about exactly? Are those things not currently true?
If he signs a long term contract then good for him. I still wouldn't give him 20m a year to give me production that is similar to what I expect from Braxton Jones going forward. Jones and Brown actually had the same PFF overall grade. One costs 20m and the other is 1m and likely to improve in his 2nd year.
mecha
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,365
- Liked Posts:
- 9,763
I admit this isn't my area of expertise, but strategically tagging him twice would make sense cause you can cut him if he performs worse and not get ganked on dead money and shit. might be one of those players where he'll overachieve for the contract and then lays down after lol
isn't there a window after the draft where you can trade/cut players? or if he hasn't been tagged again and has no current deal they just walk?
isn't there a window after the draft where you can trade/cut players? or if he hasn't been tagged again and has no current deal they just walk?
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,412
- Liked Posts:
- 7,609
So an idiot like @SugarWalls thinks that wanting to go for a player that does not fit the current scheme is a good idea. Not surprising.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,131
- Liked Posts:
- 3,984
30 by the start of the next season hard pass
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,722
- Liked Posts:
- 38,019
- Location:
- Cumming
No argument here
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up