Cubs Aggressively Shopping Gorzelanny

[Jntg4]

Via MLBTR. I'm writing a blog post on it in a minute.

 

[Jntg4]

Here's my post on it: http://jnet.ismywebsite.com/2010/12/cubs-aggressively-shopping-gorz-and-other-day-2-notes/

 

[waldo7239117]

If they really are, it won't be hard to trade him. but I really don't get it. He would be a good RP. They better get something good in return. But, I doubt it.

 

[daddies3angels]

He doesnt like the bullpen. He would be someone 4 or 5 SP for small market team. They might be able to get RP back and save some cash

 

[DewsSox79]

pittsburg post gazette is the source

 

[Captain Obvious]

pittsburg post gazette is the source

Link, please?

 

[DewsSox79]

Link, please?

you have internet

 

[waldo7239117]

Also click the link jnt posted. The blog. He posted the link in the blog entry.

 

[Captain Obvious]

you have internet

I do. Shouldn't matter.

Can we require the original source to be posted for news and such? Basically you can't link to blogs or MLBTR, unless it's MLBTR reporting. PSD does this and it is pretty nice. Plus, it gives the original author credit, which is what goes unnoticed in many cases.

It just makes sense that since we are a site that also writes, we would want the authors to get the props, not Tim Dierkes.

agreed

 

[Jntg4]

The link was just a twitter post, not really being an author.

 

[Captain Obvious]

The link was just a twitter post, not really being an author.

If someone writes it, they're the author. Even if it is twitter, that post > anything you write.

 

[Jntg4]

If someone writes it, they're the author. Even if it is twitter, that post > anything you write.

If you clicked the link you'd see the twitter link. I never said my post was better.

 

[Captain Obvious]

If you clicked the link you'd see the twitter link. I never said my post was better.

Link? I don't see a link on here? If you are referring to your blog, no. I will not go to your blog. That gives you traffic and I refuse to support that. Unless we're not going to post links to the real thing, in which case this forum needs be kicked in the balls.

 

[Jntg4]

Link? I don't see a link on here? If you are referring to your blog, no. I will not go to your blog. That gives you traffic and I refuse to support that. Unless we're not going to post links to the real thing, in which case this forum needs be kicked in the balls.

I'm not getting anything for traffic BTW, and I didn't mean it that way. All I meant was that MLBTR even linked to it and I posted via MLBTR. And it is pretty easy to look up.

 

[DewsSox79]

Link? I don't see a link on here? If you are referring to your blog, no. I will not go to your blog. That gives you traffic and I refuse to support that. Unless we're not going to post links to the real thing, in which case this forum needs be kicked in the balls.

stop trying so hard to be a mod.

anyway.......Cubs 'agressively shopping' Tom Gorzelanny - MLB- nbcsports.msnbc.com

jesus.

 

[Captain Obvious]

I'm not getting anything for traffic BTW, and I didn't mean it that way. All I meant was that MLBTR even linked to it and I posted via MLBTR. And it is pretty easy to look up.

That's not the point. The point is that we need to give credit to the real author. We're not doing that. I will not go to MLBTR to look it up. I shouldn't have to.

 

[Captain Obvious]

stop trying so hard to be a mod.

anyway.......Cubs 'agressively shopping' Tom Gorzelanny - MLB- nbcsports.msnbc.com

jesus.

I apologize for standing up for the rights of writers. Didn't know that was a sin.

 

[DewsSox79]

If someone doesnt post the link, than post it. not that hard.

 

[DewsSox79]

I apologize for standing up for the rights of writers. Didn't know that was a sin.

 

[waldo7239117]

Too bad CO can't see my posts because I would go off on him right now.