Bearcub13
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2020
- Posts:
- 1,199
- Liked Posts:
- 704
"feeble mind"@ me next time, bro!
And you started the insults, not me. “Mr. Video Game”
Did your parents not send you to school??
"feeble mind"@ me next time, bro!
And you started the insults, not me. “Mr. Video Game”
Did your parents not send you to school??
You still don’t comprehend “first” or what a “response” is, eh?!"feeble mind"
They did, but he rode the short bus.@ me next time, bro!
And you started the insults, not me. “Mr. Video Game”
Did your parents not send you to school??
My issue is with the pitch clock, it may shorten the game, but it ruins the native rhythm of the game. If you played the game you understand the interplay of the batter and pitcher. The batter is at an extreme disadvantage which creates a natural tension, the pitcher and the batter stepping on and off the rubber, in and out of the box is part of the fun of the game. Those granular little details are wonderful. Now, the changes they made to the game to get stealing back in play are not very disruptive and so far things are looking up, including batting averages, but none of that is due to the pitch clock. I never had a problem with the length of games, it was the lack of action, everybody swinging for the fences, and striking out that was hurting the game more than anything. I will live with the pitch clock and just be thankful we have baseball.I know about the game. I have wathed for many years. I don't need shiny new things. Quite the opposite.
But I know one thing: Baseball was BORING recently due to the three outcome approach, the lack of action on the bases and the length of games. And that is from me, who is far from hung up on game length vs what is occurring during that time. I don't see the thrill of watching Rick Sutcliffe hold the ball for eight minutes netween pitches or make that endless fale to third throw to first move (and I love Sutcliffe!). I don't get the thrill of seeing Skip Schumaker adjust both batting gloves after every pitch, including all those on which he doesn't move at all. Those delays do nothing to enhance the game, and that does not mean only purists understand them.
I considered Manfred's attempts to change things to be questionable when proposed. But so far they're having a positive effect.
Ohhh so now you admit the game was hurting and in need of something to salvage, or dare I say… “save” it?!My issue is with the pitch clock, it may shorten the game, but it ruins the native rhythm of the game. If you played the game you understand the interplay of the batter and pitcher. The batter is at an extreme disadvantage which creates a natural tension, the pitcher and the batter stepping on and off the rubber, in and out of the box is part of the fun of the game. Those granular little details are wonderful. Now, the changes they made to the game to get stealing back in play are not very disruptive and so far things are looking up, including batting averages, but none of that is due to the pitch clock. I never had a problem with the length of games, it was the lack of action, everybody swinging for the fences, and striking out that was hurting the game more than anything. I will live with the pitch clock and just be thankful we have baseball.
Thanks for explaining the obvious as though you alone are smart enough to understand.My issue is with the pitch clock, it may shorten the game, but it ruins the native rhythm of the game. If you played the game you understand the interplay of the batter and pitcher. The batter is at an extreme disadvantage which creates a natural tension, the pitcher and the batter stepping on and off the rubber, in and out of the box is part of the fun of the game. Those granular little details are wonderful. Now, the changes they made to the game to get stealing back in play are not very disruptive and so far things are looking up, including batting averages, but none of that is due to the pitch clock. I never had a problem with the length of games, it was the lack of action, everybody swinging for the fences, and striking out that was hurting the game more than anything. I will live with the pitch clock and just be thankful we have baseball.
Im confused, you angered about stolen bases but like the time when stealing basees were prevelant? Baseball was hurting cause we live in a time of short attention spans and pitch clock has shortened games. But, if you are a purist, you should like the small ball being played or you just being a a clot dick that means my girl clit is bigger than your dick and she aint on roids.When you wrote "save" it sounded terminal to me. Baseball being saved by a pitch clock from what, people who don't know anything about the game having to have something shiny shown to them every 30 seconds or they will turn on a rerun of Gilligan's island. The pitch clock is not about baseball, it is about profits for the owners. If the owners are handing out 200 million contracts like they were Pez, there ain't nobody going hungry here...Yes, I am a purist, I love pitchers hitting, pitchers wandering around the mound, batters readjusting, we'll call it "stuff', etc... I like bunts and double steals hitting behind the runner, suicide squeezes, safety squeezes, you know, baseball.
That Velazquez bomb was everything you dream of when you are a kid.THIS IS THE YEAR BOYZ