- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 48,332
- Liked Posts:
- 26,865
Tony Bradley just signed. Not a bad backup C.
Lol for some reason I read this as Tom Brady initiallyTony Bradley just signed. Not a bad backup C.
I'm just a lowly pleb who doesn't have ESPN insider, so what's the reasoning from the article?Trade grades: One team wins the DeMar DeRozan deal -- and it's not even close
Chicago landed the four-time All-Star via sign-and-trade with San Antonio. Here's why the Bulls might have more questions to answer after adding DeMar DeRozan.www.espn.com
Bad trade
Either way that's a good pickup. Decent bench big who can produce in limited minutesBradley with a 2 year deal. Unless you want to believe Woj against every other report, he is saying a 1 year deal
I'm just a lowly pleb who doesn't have ESPN insider, so what's the reasoning from the article?
Not saying one way or the other if it's bad or not, but Derozan is probably the most controversial player on the team right now
"Made AKME sign me off of one [stat]line"Minimum deal for Tony Bradley. Not bad at all.
Ok I see that logic. It's a bit harsh, but I suppose it really comes down to what you think of Derozan which clearly the author of that article is not high on him.haha my bad. I forget I have it, it comes with my Verizon plan I think.
gives the bulls a D- and the Spurs a B+ grade
says derozan doesn’t fit with the rest of the bulls roster. That he needs the ball in his hands too much, and that won’t happen with Lavine and ball playing with him. And giving up Thad hurts a lot.
says the Spurs made out by getting the draft picks for a player they had no intention of keeping anyways and taking on expiring contracts
I definitely don't love what they gave up, but im happy with Derozan the player. I hope they have a couple more moves up their sleeves before it's all done hereOk I see that logic. It's a bit harsh, but I suppose it really comes down to what you think of Derozan which clearly the author of that article is not high on him.
Derozan is a weird player and I think I would've preferred not to think of his fit on the team, but since he's here now gotta make the most of it.
Ok I see that logic. It's a bit harsh, but I suppose it really comes down to what you think of Derozan which clearly the author of that article is not high on him.
Derozan is a weird player and I think I would've preferred not to think of his fit on the team, but since he's here now gotta make the most of it.
I didn't realize derozan was bad defensivelyyeah, the article mentions offensively they will still score plenty of points. But that defensively derozan really hurts his teams. And he’s only going to get older and slower
I mean...how bad are we talking here? It's not like Zach is a defensive stopper eitherI didn't realize derozan was bad defensively
Well yeah Zach is awful defensively. I was under the assumption derozan was at least a solid defenderI mean...how bad are we talking here? It's not like Zach is a defensive stopper either