Cutty for Bradford, McCown as backup.

1COBearsfan

Equinsu ocha
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,508
Liked Posts:
1,877
Location:
Denver, Co
Only if both of them sign for the vet minimum
 

GBlaze08

Member in Ommys mouth
Joined:
Apr 5, 2014
Posts:
973
Liked Posts:
516
What do you guys think about this idea? I think it would be a good move.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

uUnq9UD.gif
 

Midway Fields

CCS Quarterback Guru
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
8,228
Liked Posts:
6,287
Location:
Hometown Jimmy
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
I'd do it lol. Still has some upside, takes care of the football, good accuracy, gets rid of Cutler and the worst contract in sports.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,578
Liked Posts:
23,897
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Biggest difference to us is the $10m hit we take on Jay for 2016 if he's still here March 13th. If we plan on him for 2 years, it's a non issue but if he's a 1 year stop gap, Bradford makes sense. This years cap hit to have either would be within $1m since we'd have to pay $3m in dead money to lose Jay. If we're talking placeholder and we we want something better than Josh or Clauson, it's not a bad deal and we may be able to squeeze a mid round pick along with the trade. If the trade partner likes Jay, he can be kept under contract for some time. Bradford can shop next year so that gives jay more trade value. I see them as similar other than Bradford's injury history. If he can stay healthy, Bradford is a good QB and the O we likely incorporate should more easily keep a QB upright.
 

Top