A perfect define your terms moment. The injury prone moving target argument. We had one injury prone WR in White and broken bones is not generally considered a recurring type of ding. Wheaton had a bad shoulder last year and that' pretty much his history and completely unrelated to his groin. Wright and Cam have been reliable. Other than White, none of our WRs were injury prone. Why I questioned it earlier.
It's funny because sometimes he has a relatively defendable position but will drift enough to negate it... like the WR comment. I'm personally more of the opinion that Watson risk of more problems related to this are only slightly higher than happenchance but it's purely opinion and I won't argue it as fact with silly references. So much of this sort of thing is genetics, how they heal and how strong the other structures are. For all we know, he may be more prone to injury without a previous ding. Something that's difficult to factor into additional injury studies.
Lol White has missed 2 whole seasons due to injury. There comes a point where it's just stupid to rely on him returning healthy or ever being a good WR. It's not a matter of whether bone injuries are recurring. It's a matter of he's done nothing to indicate he's worthy of being counted on.
Likewise there comes a point where amassing a WR core with 4 guys who you have no idea are still productive players due to recent injuries is just stupid.
Taking a chance one or two of these guys may be defensible. Taking a chance on 4 of them at one time at one position is stupid. The argument was never about their individual risk of reinjury. The argument was compounding the risk by having these 4 guys at the same position none of whom have proven they are still good players post injury.
I know of no team that has stacked a position with so many questionable players aside from the Bears.