beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,729
- Liked Posts:
- 3,726
Depending on which particular metric you use it can dip as low as like 13th but over the past 3 years it rates as the #10 park and it's top 10 in fewest HRs as well. If you just look at 2020 it was actually the #1 pitcher park. I guess on some level it's not that surprising given when the wind is blowing in it's really tough but i've sorta had this mental image of it being more the flip where it'd be a decently above average hitters park.
I suppose some of that could also be the fact that new stadiums have come into the league that are way more hitter friendly ever since Camden became a thing. But the fact that wrigley is a 2% more pitcher friendly than league average and petco is just 3% is kinda surprising. Over the past 3 years #1 is the mets, #2 is A's, #3 is Miami, #4 is LAD, #5 is SEA, #6 is TB, #7 is SF #8 is STL, #9 is SD and the cubs as mentioned are #10.
I suppose some of that could also be the fact that new stadiums have come into the league that are way more hitter friendly ever since Camden became a thing. But the fact that wrigley is a 2% more pitcher friendly than league average and petco is just 3% is kinda surprising. Over the past 3 years #1 is the mets, #2 is A's, #3 is Miami, #4 is LAD, #5 is SEA, #6 is TB, #7 is SF #8 is STL, #9 is SD and the cubs as mentioned are #10.