- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,490
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Back in Jax
http://avenuesdeercreek.firstcoastnews.com/news/news/67602-jacksonville-one-top-5-worst-cities-dui
So this was just a little article about Jacksonville being ranked number 4 for DUI's in the nations top 20 most populated cities. I figured we could use it as an excuse to argue the in's and out's of DUI's.
Let me start by saying ONE death that comes as a result of a DUI is too many.
Now let me ***** about DUI laws for a second. .08 is a fucking joke. That number is not about safety, it is about revenue. Study after study have shown that talking on your cell phone is the same level distraction/danger as .08 blood alcohol level and that texting is far worse, yet you don't see people getting thrown in jail, driver's license revoked and careers ruined by these acts.
DUI is a misdemeanor offense. However, it is the only one (that I know of) that will ruin you and your livelihood. Many employers won't employ/can't employ you with a DUI on your record. The punishment doesn't fit the crime. One DUI conviction can ruin a person, two or more and you might as well live in your mother's basement for the rest of your life if you want to follow the law afterwards. The .08 drivers aren't the ones killing others (IMO) it is the repeat offenders that are plastered and don't even give a damn about the law or whether or not they have a license.
Get a cab, use a designated driver..........might work in some instances. However, in a city like Jacksonville that is very large and very spread out (without a bar on every corner) and doesn't have much in the line of public transportation or a prevalence of taxi's those methods of avoiding drinking while driving aren't so realistic. Taxi's here are ungodly expensive.
Yes, all of these are excuses as to why someone might do it. Just like speeding, the easiest way to avoid the penalty if caught is simply not to do it.
When someone says "________ was killed by a drunk driver" there are many instances when you don't really know that was the truth. Person A could have been at fault, and the other person involved just happened to be under the influence so the blame automatically shifts to them. That is bullshit. I have spent many years driving around the country for a living and have had my share of "close calls" because some moron ran a sign or light, or did something else stupid. If I had been drinking my reaction might have been slowed and I may have actually hit them, but does that put 100% of the blame on me? According to the law it does. Also according to the law, because I have a CDL I am not allowed the same .08 BAC afforded those with a "regular" license even when I am driving my own personal vehicle. I think this is more bullshit.
I'm sure there are some of you who have lost loved-ones and the police said it was due to a drunk driver. I am sorry for your loss and am in no way trying to justify things. I just take some things police say with a grain of salt like "If he was not wearing his seatbelt he would still be alive." Oh really God? You know this absolutely because why? Your vast experience tells you the outcome of all situations? Statistics and probabilities are one thing, statements that make things absolute are different.
There are many sides of this argument and I see most of them clearly. Please discuss.
So this was just a little article about Jacksonville being ranked number 4 for DUI's in the nations top 20 most populated cities. I figured we could use it as an excuse to argue the in's and out's of DUI's.
Let me start by saying ONE death that comes as a result of a DUI is too many.
Now let me ***** about DUI laws for a second. .08 is a fucking joke. That number is not about safety, it is about revenue. Study after study have shown that talking on your cell phone is the same level distraction/danger as .08 blood alcohol level and that texting is far worse, yet you don't see people getting thrown in jail, driver's license revoked and careers ruined by these acts.
DUI is a misdemeanor offense. However, it is the only one (that I know of) that will ruin you and your livelihood. Many employers won't employ/can't employ you with a DUI on your record. The punishment doesn't fit the crime. One DUI conviction can ruin a person, two or more and you might as well live in your mother's basement for the rest of your life if you want to follow the law afterwards. The .08 drivers aren't the ones killing others (IMO) it is the repeat offenders that are plastered and don't even give a damn about the law or whether or not they have a license.
Get a cab, use a designated driver..........might work in some instances. However, in a city like Jacksonville that is very large and very spread out (without a bar on every corner) and doesn't have much in the line of public transportation or a prevalence of taxi's those methods of avoiding drinking while driving aren't so realistic. Taxi's here are ungodly expensive.
Yes, all of these are excuses as to why someone might do it. Just like speeding, the easiest way to avoid the penalty if caught is simply not to do it.
When someone says "________ was killed by a drunk driver" there are many instances when you don't really know that was the truth. Person A could have been at fault, and the other person involved just happened to be under the influence so the blame automatically shifts to them. That is bullshit. I have spent many years driving around the country for a living and have had my share of "close calls" because some moron ran a sign or light, or did something else stupid. If I had been drinking my reaction might have been slowed and I may have actually hit them, but does that put 100% of the blame on me? According to the law it does. Also according to the law, because I have a CDL I am not allowed the same .08 BAC afforded those with a "regular" license even when I am driving my own personal vehicle. I think this is more bullshit.
I'm sure there are some of you who have lost loved-ones and the police said it was due to a drunk driver. I am sorry for your loss and am in no way trying to justify things. I just take some things police say with a grain of salt like "If he was not wearing his seatbelt he would still be alive." Oh really God? You know this absolutely because why? Your vast experience tells you the outcome of all situations? Statistics and probabilities are one thing, statements that make things absolute are different.
There are many sides of this argument and I see most of them clearly. Please discuss.