Rory Sparrow
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,850
- Liked Posts:
- 3,735
Are you serious right now? Or just being a cunt for effect?
Talking about Renee Zellwegger makes me a cunt? Strange. I'd rather cape for Zellwegger than Amos.
Are you serious right now? Or just being a cunt for effect?
He just raging because he's in the Sarah Jessica Parker camp. Her versatility is so underrated.Talking about Renee Zellwegger makes me a cunt? Strange. I'd rather cape for Zellwegger than Amos.
He just raging because he's in the Sarah Jessica Parker camp.
Like I said...versatileLOL at anyone being in the SJP camp.
"Her face looks like a foot!"
LOL at anyone being in the SJP camp.
"Her face looks like a foot!"
Rex Ryan might be a SJP fan
He just raging because he's in the Sarah Jessica Parker camp. Her versatility is so underrated.
pre or post snap? Also, I heard he called that hybrid position the bunion.Coincidentally, Rex Ryan was the first football coach to use his S as an LB.
Fangio is actually considered one of the best at disguising coverages and was routinely praised for it during broadcasters. One instance that immediately comes to mind is the Eddie Jackson pick six on thanksgiving that Romo attributed to the coverage fooling @nc0gnet0s boy StaffordSeriously. Do you really not understand the concept of dropping a safety to linebacker? Its not like this shit is new and Fangio is one of the masterminds behind playing coverage.
You have a classic case of revisionist history because Amos was never good at generating interceptions and did miss a few opportunities but he rarely missed an assignment. Calling either of those a lot is being disingenuous. That is a fact.
Please define deploying a safety as a linebacker post snap. WTF does that even mean? And honestly even show me where he had him line up as a LB. Bringing a safety into the box is not lining him up at LB.
Cycling out a linebacker into coverage or blitzing and replacing him with a safety isn't the same thing at all as just bringing a safety down into the box.
Maybe he didn't miss assignments much but Fangio also did not ask him to do all that much in coverage. Which is smart of Fangio. But if you watch, in two deep looks, Amos was usually only responsible for about 1/3 of the field with Jackson covering 2/3.
Amos was solid in the box, but Fangio had to scheme to protect him from getting exposed in the intermediate to deep pass game. Amos was/is just a role player. Solid if he has help around him, but nothing you tie too much money up with and a guy you always have an eye out for upgrading.
No its not. The safety's responsibility isn't the same under one scenario versus the other...