Evaluating cubs hitting prospects

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
Since people liked the pitching topic I figured I'd run through the hitting prospects.

Javier Baez - Is there really anything I need to say that hasn't already been said? Baez's .346 ISO over 240 PAs was ridiculous. How ridiculous? Over the past 8 years only 3 players in all of AA have had over .320 ISO and those are Paul Goldschmidt(.320), Giancarlo Stanton(.417), and Mike Moustakas(.340). For those unfamiliar, ISO is basically extra base hits divided by at bats. The idea being it gives you a good idea of someone's power potential by removing base hits. Goldschmidt hit 36 HRs this year. Stanton had a down year but the previous 2 years hit 34 and 37 HRs. Moustakas' ISO that year was a bit inflated because he hit .347 and the only other time he's ever hit over .300 even in minors was over 44 PAs in R. So realistically you can probably expect 35 HR power.

What's scary however is his walk and strikeout rates. He posted his best walk rate ever in AA at 7.9% which is promising not only because it's improving but because it's improving at higher levels. On the other hand, his strike out rate was 28.8% in AA which was his highest at any level with a decent amount of PAs. Fangraphs doesn't pitch f/x data at the minor league level so it's difficult to judge exactly what happened there. It's possible he's striking out more because he's taking more pitches in the zone. Why is this scary though? Not a lot of the top hitters profile well at those rates. You're looking more at someone like Trumbo at those rates(8.0%/27.1%). Soriano, Pedro Alvarez, Jay Bruce, and Brandon Moss are others who have that kind of power and similar walk/strikeout rates. If he can get closer to 10%/20% then he should be fine. Longoria has made that work for him as have others.

Kris Bryant - There's not a boat load of data on him yet. He has 238 PA's over R/A-/A/AFL. The AFL data is probably the best as it often has AA level players though pitching there often doesn't include your top tier pitchers and it is more of a offensive league than favoring pitching. I'm not going to go too in depth with him but his 15.2%/25.0% and 10.4%/22.1% BB/K rates are very promising. The numbers really do bear the comparisons people have made to Longoria. Though, Bryant may actually have more power. His ISO was .364 in the AFL, .338 in Boise and .386 in Daytona. Longoria never had more than .291 ISO at any level with 50+ PAs. Top end you're possibly looking at some where between Longoria and Cabrera.... which is scary good. I'm really not seeing much to worry about here. His K rate could be better but that does tend to go level off a bit over more PAs and it was his first professional season.

Albert Almora - I feel it's difficult to judge him at 19. His 6.3%/11.0% bb/k rates aren't bad especially when you consider the type of player he's likely to be. That is to say someone who puts the ball in play a lot. Low end you're looking at someone like Denard Span probably. If his power grows like some expect Coco Crisp comparisons aren't outlandish. Just comparing him to McCutchen at the same age/level he had roughly half as many HRs so realistically top end for power on Almora may be 15-20 HRs. So, I'd say he has the chance to be a good player but I don't really see superstar. That being said, I do feel Span and Crisp are largely underrated players by fans for what they give you.

Jorge Soler - He had 8.9%/16.1% bb/k rate at Daytona which is encouraging. Alex Rios might be a good comparison of what he could be. Andre Ethier wouldn't be a bad comparison either. His absolute top end might be Carlos Beltran levels but I'm not sure he develops enough power to reach peak Beltran levels. Before looking more deeply into the numbers I was some what skeptical especially considering he was a corner OFer. But having given it some more thought, the fact that he's putting the ball into play 75% of the time is a good sign as .300 is league average for balls in play. Add that to his pretty decent walk rate and you should have a good OBP player. I do wonder how much power he develops though

Arismendy Alcantara - He's actually the reason I wanted to write this. His AA season this year really pops out when you consider his position. He had 15 HRs and 31 steals. That sort of combo at 2B is pretty unheard of. Altuve, Kipnis, and Daniel Murphy were the only 2B to steal over 20 basses. If you expand that to include SS you're talking about Jean Segura, Elvis Andrus, Alexei Ramirez, Jimmy Rollins, Alcides Escobar and Ian Desmond. Of those, only Desmond, Segura, Kipnis and Murphy had more than 10 HRs. Murphy never hit more than 13 HRs at any level. Segura probably has a tad more speed(stole 37 bases 451 PAs vs 31 in 571 PAs) but less power(.110 ISO vs .180). Kipnis and Desmond might be the best comparisons but both reach AA later than Alcantara(1 year for Desmond 2 for Kipnis). If he turns out to be an above average defender it wouldn't surprise me at all if he ends up putting up higher WAR totals than Soler and Almora assuming everyone pans out.

Dan Vogelbach - He had 11.4%/15.2% bb/k rate in A last year to go along with 17 HRs. That's sort of an unusual combination for a 1B. The only 1B last year with greater than 10% walk rate and less than 20% k rate were Edwin Encarnacion, Prince Fielder, Rizzo, Votto and Freeman. Freeman isn't a great comparison because he doesn't have the same power and doesn't walk as much. Rizzo struck out more and had a bit more power at a similar age but had a worse average. Fielder had considerably more power. Fangraphs doesn't have Encarnacion's minor numbers and he developed kind of late so it's hard to compare him. Votto may be the best comparison. However, Votto had a better average and walked more. Looking back a little farther, some names that compare are Will Clark and Ryan Klesko but none of them are a "perfect" match.

Mike Olt - Looking at the numbers it's really surprising that Texas was unwilling to part with him before this year. I'm going off his breakthrough year of 2012 in AA where he had a 14.5%/24.0% bb/k rate. Since 1980 the list of players who were over 10% walk rate and 21% K rate at 3B isn't stellar. You're talking about Mark Reynolds, Russell Branyan, and Troy Glaus. The difference between Branyan/Reynolds and Glaus is a player who hits .230/.330 avg/obp and a player who hits .255/.360. Can Olt hit .250 in the majors? That' basically the difference between a piece in your long term plan and a journeymen type.

Christian Villanueva - Not going to beat around the bush here. I see him more as a role player type. His 6.3%/21.6% bb/k rate and other numbers is similar to guys like Ty Wiggington and Bill Hall. With the organizational depth here, it might be nice to deal him to a team wanting a cost controlled guy once he's ready for the majors. He is probably good enough to start some where but I don't think anyone will be thrilled about it.

Jeimer Candelario - Like Almora its a bit hard to project as he's 19. A quick look at a scouting report expects him to average power. So, when you add that to his 11.9%/15.4 % bb/k rate he becomes intriguing. But the range of players since 99 with less than 18% k rate and greater than 10% bb rate at 3b is all over the place. You have the Chipper Jones, Scott Rolen, and Miggy Cabrera's of the world. You have Willie Aybar, Craig Counsel and Nick Punto's of the world. I'd like to believe he's some where between there if he pans out. Maybe 2006 Eric Chavez levels(22 HRs, .241/.351/.435)?

Eloy Jimenez - no stats on fangraphs as of yet and as a 16 year old he's best case 4-5 years away.

Gleyber Torres - no stats on fangraphs as of yet and as a 16 year old he's best case 4-5 years away.

Matt Szczur - Compares to Angel Pagan with less power, Denard Span with a tad more speed.

Josh Vitters - I've been saying it for awhile but I think he might win the LF job. In 100 PA last year at AAA he had 11.0%/19.0% with .295/.380/.511. The year before he had 6.6%/17.0% .304/.356/.513. This was PCL so that's some what inflated. However, if the 11% walk rate last year was for real I feel like it could be a major break through that leads to him being a useful player at the MLB level. Projections have him at 6.0%/20.8% with 20 HRs and .253/.305/.423. Believe it or not, if he meets those projections he'd be basically as good as Soriano was in LF minus a few HRs for the cubs(Soriano wasn't very good last year til he got to NY). If the 11% walk rate is for real you could be looking at someone in the .320-.330 OBP range which would be a big boost to what they got out of LF last year.

Gioskar Amaya - He's a lot more interesting if he can stay at C. At A last year he had a 8.1%/21.1% bb/k rate with .252/.329/.369. He can also steal 15-20 bases. So in that regard he might end up being a slightly worse Russell Martin. Brad Ausmus might be another fair comparison.

Yasiel Balaguert - 9.7%/26.0% .261/.331/.433 with 15ish HR potential in the OF. He's 20 and still in low A. Probably need to have a breakout season in the next year or two or may end up being a career minor league type.

Rubi Silva - 3.7%/20.2/% .284/.310/.483 with 15/15 potential. He's 24 and in AA. Not seeing a lot to love here. Maybe 4th/5th OF type if he had a breakthrough soonish.

Willson Contreras - 7.5%/19.1% .248/.320/.423 with 15-20 HR potential. He's a 21 year old C in A. Amaya is a year younger and may be the more interesting option. But, both are the top 2 C prospects at the moment so they may have back up C status in the next couple of years.

Jacob Hanneman - He had 74 PA's as a 22 year old in A-. There's not really enough data to say anything but 22 in A- isn't a great sign.

John Andreoli - He's mildly interesting. 9.3%/16.8% .289/.358/.398 in AA last year. He's basically got no power but 50+ SB speed. Considering the overall lack of elite speed he's something worth talking about. The next best guys you're talking 30 with Alcantara and maybe 20 with Almora. Brett Gardner comparisons aren't out of line.

Brett Jackson - I'm not seeing much to like. Even if you go back to highly touted years of 2010-2012 he basically had 10%/25% bb/k rate. The list of players since 1980 in the OF who fit that doesn't really match up with the type of player Jackson is other than B.J. Upton and Jordan Schafer. Unless he finds some way to get under 25% k rate and preferably under 20% I honestly think he's done. To make matters worse, last year he was at 31.8%. So, it's not getting better.

Shawon Dunston - His 2013 was pretty interesting. He had 12.6%/11.2% .290/.378/.358 in A- as a 20 year old. He has basically no power but could probably steal 30+ bases. He stole 12 in 223 PAs. If he manages to keep that walk/k rate up he could end up a good one. Since 1990 guys with an ISO of less than .150, walk rate greater than 10% and K rate less than 15% include Kenny Lofton, Rickey Henderson, Lenny Dykstra, and Tim Raines. There are some lessor known names as well but that list is pretty good.

Jae-Hoon Ha - 9.5%/18.1% .273/.352/.385 in AA in 2012. He split time between AA/AA last year making it hard to compile stuff. Doesn't look like more than a bench player to me.

Zeke DeVoss - mildly interesting for his speed(40+ SB ability) but he's 22 in A+ and hit .246. He does make up for it some with a 15.2% walk rate but probably needs to have a breakout season in order to get anywhere.

Summary
After Josh Vitters and Szczur the hitting prospects sort of fall off. Dunston as I mentioned is interesting but most of the rest just seem like guys nothing special. As for the top of the system, Baez seems like he could either be really good or not very good. Bryant seems like the closest thing to a sure thing. Almora and Soler seem like they could be good but not super stars. Alcantara might be underrated. Given his position and what he did at AA he might end up one of the top 2B in the league in the next couple of years. I have no idea what to make of Vogelbach compared to others. Olt doesn't feel like he has a ton of upside to me. After that it looks like borderline starters though I do sort of like Vitters and Szczur in the near term.
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
Oh, if there's anyone I missed feel free to point them out and I'll take a look. I'm going off cubs den's top 50 prospects list. They had a "best of the rest" I looked through too but most of the rest didn't have enough data or the data they did have really didn't stand out enough for me to care to write anything.

Also, I should mention I'm looking at this as though everyone were to pan out because it's simply too hard to predict who will suddenly get hurt or just flat out start sucking worse. That being said, the ones I'd worry the most about are the ones with the higher K rates(read 20+%).
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
Baez: Best on the farm, my best bet to make it in the majors. Gary Sheffield 2.0.

Bryant: 2nd best bat, needs to cut down on the K's, but I see no reason why he cant compare to Evan Longoria.

Almora: Nothing particularly special about him, except he's young and has a pretty average.

Soler: One of my many 'bust' picks.

Alcantara: I'm sure his SB/HR ratio you pointed out will dwindle. I just ask he be twice as good as Darwin Barney at the plate.

Vogelbach: Honestly, I see him taking Rizzo's spot in 2-3 years at 1B when Rizzo flat out becomes the next Mark Reynolds.

Olt: Bust.

Villanueva: Bust at the plate, but keep him around for D.

Calendario: Meh.

Torres and Jimenez: Wait and see.

Szczur: Hope he makes it. And hope more he gets on base so he can use his speed, not be Campana and have to pinch run.

Next few names are turds I don't want to waste time calling turds in their own unique little ways.

Hanneman: Think of him as 19, or a brand new 2009 car. Is he a 2014, fresh off the assembly line? No. He took his 2 year Mormon mission and came back at BYU after 2 years off of baseball. I like him.

Turds until the end.

Since you've done plenty of turds, do Rock Shoulders. That name is excellent. Any chance his power translates?
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,666
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
Baez has the highest upside but Bryant is the best sure bet.

The rest are maybe's.

I think you still give too much love to Vitters. I believe he is in AAA regardless what happens in S/T. The only way he cracks the line up is if Lake flames out and he is crushing Iowa. Or Lake goes DL and Vitters takes his place.

The thing is Lake has a better all around game. Strong arm good range. Power speed can go small ball etc. Vitters lacks the athetlitism Lake has. So he would have to beat him in raw power. And 20 HR power doesn't justify it.

Again I don't see it.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
i think 3B going to be either olt or vitters to win in ST, and if neither takes it then they will fall back to a murphy/valbuena platoon..

having olt or vitters take over 3B and do good, and using murphy/valbuena at 2B would be best case scenario for cubs, which would allow them to deal barney and give more time for Baez and Bryant to get ABs and grow in minors..
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,666
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
Theo put a lot of value into D.

Barney there with subpar O.

Rizzo over LaHair. Then LaHair not given RF.

Vitters pushed off of 3B last year.

Lake a SS and playing 3B at Iowa get promoted to LF? Again D.


So if you want to make educated guesses try to educate first before guessing.

I like the thread though.

I would put my money on status que with Baez moved off of SS. Again due to his D. I'm not sure where he ends up. If the adjusts to 3B fine. LF is another possibility. Fact that Castro improved last year at SS makes it questionable taking a step back.

At 2B it is Barney's to lose due to his D. Alcantara would have to put up top end D to take it. We are talking about replacing a top 3 ranked D player and in the GG conversation. His production also took a hit with Rizzo and Castro (and Sori). It was a team wide issue and that points directly at the coaching staff.

I would keep it status que. Ya weird saying this but right now Alcantara has to prove he is a quality 2B and has to surpass AAA before even getting into the conversation.

Dark horse would be Watkins getting into a platoon. He came up a 2B and has solid OBA skills. His glove is concidered good. He may become a potential main lead off.

3B with the platoon based off of last year should net 30 HR's. I doubt this will happen. I believe Murphy was a fluke.
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
Since you've done plenty of turds, do Rock Shoulders. That name is excellent. Any chance his power translates?

Roderick Shoulders - 13.1%/28.4% .258/.352/.445 Power is nice but his K rate is worrying. The plus side is he's already walking at a decent clip. If his average doesn't drop considerably as he moves up he has a shot. His .350 OBP is actually pretty good but if he's a .200 hitter in the majors then it's not as nice. If he can get his k rate below 25% that should help his average as well. He might end up being a Adam Dunn type though I don't think Shoulders has as much power. Dunn was 13.3%/25.9% .316 ISO .262/.371/.578 as a 21 year old in half a season in the majors.
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
Roderick Shoulders - 13.1%/28.4% .258/.352/.445 Power is nice but his K rate is worrying. The plus side is he's already walking at a decent clip. If his average doesn't drop considerably as he moves up he has a shot. His .350 OBP is actually pretty good but if he's a .200 hitter in the majors then it's not as nice. If he can get his k rate below 25% that should help his average as well. He might end up being a Adam Dunn type though I don't think Shoulders has as much power. Dunn was 13.3%/25.9% .316 ISO .262/.371/.578 as a 21 year old in half a season in the majors.

Realistically speaking: we've seen people on these boards be willing to throw Vogelbach up as a trade piece as a DH to an AL team for a trade scenarios. Why not this guy instead?

He compares to Dunn as you say power and walk wise, but Vogelbach has slimmed down while Rock keeps the lbs on. Both are streaky at the plate. Assuming Rock does make it, where would he fit in on the cubs team?
 

Chris J

Chris Jelinek
Joined:
Jul 22, 2011
Posts:
609
Liked Posts:
139
Location:
Joliet
Baez: Best on the farm, my best bet to make it in the majors. Gary Sheffield 2.0.

Bryant: 2nd best bat, needs to cut down on the K's, but I see no reason why he cant compare to Evan Longoria.

Almora: Nothing particularly special about him, except he's young and has a pretty average.

Soler: One of my many 'bust' picks.

Alcantara: I'm sure his SB/HR ratio you pointed out will dwindle. I just ask he be twice as good as Darwin Barney at the plate.

Vogelbach: Honestly, I see him taking Rizzo's spot in 2-3 years at 1B when Rizzo flat out becomes the next Mark Reynolds.

Olt: Bust.

Villanueva: Bust at the plate, but keep him around for D.

Calendario: Meh.

Torres and Jimenez: Wait and see.

Szczur: Hope he makes it. And hope more he gets on base so he can use his speed, not be Campana and have to pinch run.

Next few names are turds I don't want to waste time calling turds in their own unique little ways.

Hanneman: Think of him as 19, or a brand new 2009 car. Is he a 2014, fresh off the assembly line? No. He took his 2 year Mormon mission and came back at BYU after 2 years off of baseball. I like him.

Turds until the end.

Since you've done plenty of turds, do Rock Shoulders. That name is excellent. Any chance his power translates?

First question. Have you actually gone to watch these players or what are you going off of?

Second question: How is Almora not special? Guess five tool players arent special
 

Chris J

Chris Jelinek
Joined:
Jul 22, 2011
Posts:
609
Liked Posts:
139
Location:
Joliet
Realistically speaking: we've seen people on these boards be willing to throw Vogelbach up as a trade piece as a DH to an AL team for a trade scenarios. Why not this guy instead?

He compares to Dunn as you say power and walk wise, but Vogelbach has slimmed down while Rock keeps the lbs on. Both are streaky at the plate. Assuming Rock does make it, where would he fit in on the cubs team?

Because scouts and coaches believe Vogelbach has more upside and a better bat than Shoulders. Shoulders is a low tier prospect and Vogelbach is a top #10 organizational prospect? Vogelbach can't play defense so he will be a full time DH like David Ortiz and Billy Butler.

Vogelbach can get you back a few nice pieces in a year or two. Shoulders wont get you anything
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
First question. Have you actually gone to watch these players or what are you going off of?

Second question: How is Almora not special? Guess five tool players arent special

I look at what's in front of my face as a whole, you know.....common sense. The thing where players overall let you know if they're pretenders or not. Rock is similar to Vogelbach to me, except Vogelbach has worked on personal fitness.

5 tool players are special? Holy shit. Wasn't Brett Jackson a 5 tool player?

Oh Wait, I forgot. You slurp Theo. Jackson isn't a Theo guy. But if he was you'd defend him till the bitter end because you're an idiot.

If Shoulders pounds 40 home runs in the minors in 2014, is he still as useless as you say he is?
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
Realistically speaking: we've seen people on these boards be willing to throw Vogelbach up as a trade piece as a DH to an AL team for a trade scenarios. Why not this guy instead?

He compares to Dunn as you say power and walk wise, but Vogelbach has slimmed down while Rock keeps the lbs on. Both are streaky at the plate. Assuming Rock does make it, where would he fit in on the cubs team?

Well realistically he probably needs to get to AA and keep at this rate before he has any trade value. At this point he'd be a throw in type piece to get a trade done. Vogelbach is likely similar too in that regard. I would say that Vogelbach probably has a better value at the moment just because at .250 avg Shoulders has the chance to go down to the low .200's as he progresses while Vogelbach still has room to fall and still be a half way decent hitter.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,666
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
I don't even think is close between the two. Vogelbach has better understanding of the strike zone. That is why he got promoted and Shoulders stayed at KC.

Roderick Shoulders - 13.1%/28.4% bb/k Ball in play 58.5%

Dan Vogelbach - 11.4%/15.2% bb/k Ball in play 73.4%

That is a big difference in contact. 600 AB's 351 balls in play for Shoulders vs 440 for Vogelbach.

If you are wanting a pure hitter I'd go with the guy who puts it into play more.

Almora should be a decent hitter. He has #2 hitter written all over him. loads of contact. Low SO/BB so puts the ball in play alot.

top ended D. 20 SB ability.

He is a solid all round player. I believe the whole 5 tool was blown out of proportion by 1 scout and then horn tooted on MLB.com.

They said the same thing about Castro. Power will come....ok?
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
With regard to Almora, I think he'll be a fine player just not a McCutchen level CF. Like I said I think people tend to underrate Coco Crisp and Denard Span. Both have been around 3 WAR players the past 3 years. When you compare that to other OF it's kind of mediocre(around 30 range) but you also have to account for the fact they play CF and a lot of the guys higher up play a corner OF spot.

The problem I see for Almora stopping him from being an elite level CF is he may have some power but it's probably average at best and he has solid speed but it's not elite either. There's only so much he can do with that skill set. I think he's a safe player in that he's unlikely to just be flat out bad. But, unless he develops more speed/power I think his top end is Castro/Rizzo current level which is to say a 3-4 WAR player.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Arismendy Alcantara (Iowa): I feel like I have much more #want than Soler, but he's got some serious #rig and a big ceiling. I think I'm a better bet to reach mine though. Any chance I'm a better pro? How do I fit in this crowded infield in three years?

Jason Parks: Soler has a higher ceiling, but less feel for the game and less ability to make adjustments. He's a higher rated prospect because of the enormous raw power, which could end up manifesting itself as 30 bombs at the major league level, something you will never bring to the table. But you have a good chance of being the better major league player, despite not being the better minor league prospect. I know that's a ridiculous statement, but I believe it to be true. You could be Jose Reyes-light, and Soler could end up a AAAA type.







Albert Almora (Chicago): Which of my tools is my best asset? Thanks!

Jason Parks: Hit tool. But I think you are a sum player; a combination of average (to solid-avg) tools that should play up because of your overall feel and instincts for the game. You have playable skills. You will play in the majors. Are you a star or more of a solid-avg regular type? That's a big debate among my scouting sources. It ranges from role 5 to role high 6 (if you think the power shows up).
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Dale (KY)

Junior Lake, I know you are not a fan, but is there enough potential upside to give him a full shot in LF/CF this year, or just wishful thinking?

Klaw
(1:14 PM)

Wishful thinking. I would trade him for a half-decent pitching prospect in a heartbeat.








Dale (KY)

Bryant, Baez, Alcantara, Castro. Which positions are the best fits for them?

Klaw
(1:24 PM)

3b, ss, 2b, ... lf?









BassmanUW (Chicago)

To what level are Kris Bryant's K rates at High A and in the AFL concerning? Or is it too early to be concerned about that, considering how many times he changed levels in just a few months since going pro.

Klaw
(1:45 PM)

That feels to me like looking for something to worry about. He could punch out 150 times a year in the big leagues and still be an MVP candidate.







JT (Alliance, NE) [via mobile]

Klaw, I saw a video online outlining Albert Almora as a five tool player with power probably being the last to come along. Do you agree? Could playing in Wrigley slow down or help his power?

Klaw
(2:00 PM)

Uh, no. Speed is one of those five tools and Al-Al (sorry, I'll never call him that again) doesn't have it.






Norm (New Mexico)

Merry Christmas to you and yours. We'll miss your straight talking. Were you implying above that Baez would replace Castro at SS?

Klaw
(2:01 PM)

I think Baez will be a better shortstop than Starlin, if given the chance. But I also think if Castro doesn't hit, and take an occasional pitch, it won't matter at all where he plays.
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
Well realistically he probably needs to get to AA and keep at this rate before he has any trade value. At this point he'd be a throw in type piece to get a trade done. Vogelbach is likely similar too in that regard. I would say that Vogelbach probably has a better value at the moment just because at .250 avg Shoulders has the chance to go down to the low .200's as he progresses while Vogelbach still has room to fall and still be a half way decent hitter.

In your opinion, say Shoulders makes it to the big leagues. Is he a 40 home run a year player at the ML level? Adam Dunn 2.0?
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
In your opinion, say Shoulders makes it to the big leagues. Is he a 40 home run a year player at the ML level? Adam Dunn 2.0?

Na, he doesnt rate out with that much power. Shoulders has a lot of holes in his swing and defensively is not good. Awesome name. Long shot to make it. Last year, he started off awesome then his numbers dropped hard. Only Baez and Bryant could rate out at 40 homerun power right now. Soler power is real raw and Volgelbach has shown monster power, but hasnt really put it on at all times because he is such an all around hitter.
 

Chris J

Chris Jelinek
Joined:
Jul 22, 2011
Posts:
609
Liked Posts:
139
Location:
Joliet
I look at what's in front of my face as a whole, you know.....common sense. The thing where players overall let you know if they're pretenders or not. Rock is similar to Vogelbach to me, except Vogelbach has worked on personal fitness.

5 tool players are special? Holy shit. Wasn't Brett Jackson a 5 tool player?

Oh Wait, I forgot. You slurp Theo. Jackson isn't a Theo guy. But if he was you'd defend him till the bitter end because you're an idiot.

If Shoulders pounds 40 home runs in the minors in 2014, is he still as useless as you say he is?


The fact that you think Shoulders and Vogelbach are the same shows you dont look at what's in front of your face. I guess you see something scouts and evaluators allllll around baseball dont see. stop.
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
The fact that you think Shoulders and Vogelbach are the same shows you dont look at what's in front of your face. I guess you see something scouts and evaluators allllll around baseball dont see. stop.

Back on your slurping high horse. Glorious.

I was just asking. I insinuated nothing. But in front of my face, from the average, walks, obp, what he does with RISP, Vogelbach shows me he has an excellent chance of making it to the bigs. Its a much brighter outlook than I have for Rizzo, who has blown his load enough to get paid, but be 1/3of the player you all slurp him to be.
 

Top