?Fields Injury Update? - ✨️CLEARED TO START VS THE PACKERS✨️ ❕️❗️❕️❗️

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
Right it is your decision you will be a coward and not answer the question.

You were fine shitting on Fields in hundreds of posts but now all of a sudden you need my input to answer the question.

Again better to just admit you are a Mac Jones stan. If Jones was outplaying Fields you would have no problem posting about it.
So is that a yes your vortex is over?

Or are you cowering behind it because you know your other excuses are falling apart after a QB change for the Bears?

I would love to explain why your wrong with that as well.. give up.. you have lost
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,904
Liked Posts:
41,693
No but he sure is ruining the it's all the OL and WR fault for Fields..

Is this the reason you didn't cancel the vortex? You know your other points where going to crumble?

The coward claims he cant engage in more than one vortex but here he is in the game thread trying to engage in another vortex.

A liar and a coward. How is it you can engage when it is shitting on Fields?

So is that a yes your vortex is over?

Or are you cowering behind it because you know your other excuses are falling apart after a QB change for the Bears?

I would love to explain why your wrong with that as well.. give up.. you have lost

Nope your lie has been exposed. You are happy to debate so long as you arw shitting on Fields.

Do you still think Pace picked the wrong QB?
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
The coward claims he cant engage in more than one vortex but here he is in the game thread trying to engage in another vortex.

A liar and a coward. How is it you can engage when it is shitting on Fields?
Won't engage in more then one vortex.

And my god you have turned into a pussy, never known you to run and hide.. tell you what, I know you actually saying "I cancel the vortex" is not easy for someone with your mental problems. Your vortex has ended so come Mon as long as you don't start it up again then we can call it a wrap and I will answer the Pace drafting QB problems..

Or I will post it right now if you cancel it here and now.. up to you
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,904
Liked Posts:
41,693
And yet you were quick to respond to something I said in the game thread because you wanted to shit on Fields. You are lying. You dont want to respond because it doesnt let you shit on Fields.

I already know what you are going to say. You are hoping that on Monday you can talk endlessly about how Trevor gets rid of the ball quickly and you will have an orgasm over him throwing for over 200 yards even if he doesnt score 30 points.

You are so predictable.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
And yet you were quick to respond to something I said in the game thread because you wanted to shit on Fields. You are lying. You dont want to respond because it doesnt let you shit on Fields.

I already know what you are going to say. You are hoping that on Monday you can talk endlessly about how Trevor gets rid of the ball quickly and you will have an orgasm over him throwing for over 200 yards even if he doesnt score 30 points.

You are so predictable.
Nope the debate was about Mitch and Fields and the question was if Pace picked the wrong QB.. that has nothing to do with Trevor.

Yes I did respond to the in game thread, I laid out how to deal with your vortex about 10 pages ago.

1 you will try change what you said,
2 you will create strawman arguments
3 you will try and change the subject

The key is to not fall for those tactics, keep you on track to what was being debated when your vortex kicked in. With the exception of posting to make fun of what you said, half the time your vortex makes you look like an idiot (like your complete tangent about internal vs external)

So posting to make you look stupid or make fun of you is always an option.. laughing at your Field excuses crumbling away is fair game, but that's as far as it goes, not getting into another vortex about the OL until this one is over (and it's over, we all know it, just seeing how crazy I can make you look with refusing to admit it)
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
41,028
Liked Posts:
38,379
Location:
Cumming
Nope the debate was about Mitch and Fields and the question was if Pace picked the wrong QB.. that has nothing to do with Trevor.

Yes I did respond to the in game thread, I laid out how to deal with your vortex about 10 pages ago.

1 you will try change what you said,
2 you will create strawman arguments
3 you will try and change the subject

The key is to not fall for those tactics, keep you on track to what was being debated when your vortex kicked in. With the exception of posting to make fun of what you said, half the time your vortex makes you look like an idiot (like your complete tangent about internal vs external)

So posting to make you look stupid or make fun of you is always an option.. laughing at your Field excuses crumbling away is fair game, but that's as far as it goes, not getting into another vortex about the OL until this one is over (and it's over, we all know it, just seeing how crazy I can make you look with refusing to admit it)
So why do you believe Pace drafted the wrong QB?
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,904
Liked Posts:
41,693
Nope the debate was about Mitch and Fields and the question was if Pace picked the wrong QB.. that has nothing to do with Trevor.

Yes I did respond to the in game thread, I laid out how to deal with your vortex about 10 pages ago.

1 you will try change what you said,
2 you will create strawman arguments
3 you will try and change the subject

The key is to not fall for those tactics, keep you on track to what was being debated when your vortex kicked in. With the exception of posting to make fun of what you said, half the time your vortex makes you look like an idiot (like your complete tangent about internal vs external)

So posting to make you look stupid or make fun of you is always an option.. laughing at your Field excuses crumbling away is fair game, but that's as far as it goes, not getting into another vortex about the OL until this one is over (and it's over, we all know it, just seeing how crazy I can make you look with refusing to admit it)

Except you claimed you could only deal with one vortex but then immediately tried to start another one in the game thread as a means to shit on Fields.

If your claims were true you would not have responded to me at all. You are lying mate.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
Except you claimed you could only deal with one vortex but then immediately tried to start another one in the game thread as a means to shit on Fields.

If your claims were true you would not have responded to me at all. You are lying mate.
Me laughing at your crumbling excuses is not a vortex.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
You already let us know with this cowardly running.


You are lying.
Me asking why anyone would trust Pace does not answer the Fields vs Jones and who I would prefer.

And if my making fun of you about The OL excuses kicked off another vortex then the fact I'm not engaging on it proves...

Wait a min.. nice try with the vortex attempt.. not falling for your attempt of changing the subject.. almost got me!
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,904
Liked Posts:
41,693
Me asking why anyone would trust Pace does not answer the Fields vs Jones and who I would prefer.

And if my making fun of you about The OL excuses kicked off another vortex then the fact I'm not engaging on it proves...

Wait a min.. nice try with the vortex attempt.. not falling for your attempt of changing the subject.. almost got me!
Umm no. I didnt respond to you in that thread. I posted here to prove you are a liar.

We all know you are a Jones nuthugger.



P.S. People are laughing at you not me. You are the one taking heat for your lying and cowardice.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
Umm no. I didnt respond to you in that thread. I posted here to prove you are a liar.

We all know you are a Jones nuthugger.



P.S. People are laughing at you not me. You are the one taking heat for your lying and cowardice.
I said I'm not going to go for your attempted change of subject and I'm not. You want to know about Jones VS Fields is a classic vortex attempt because you look like a fucking idiot with bringing up the "Pressure" argument

You realized how stupid you look but there is also something wrong with you where you can't admit you're wrong or walk away, it's sad really.

So when I said I'm only dealing with one vortex at a time that's not a lie, me posting to make fun of you is not engaging in a second vortex, it's just making fun of you

That's always an option, so you want to debate anything else other then me making fun of you, you're going to have to let this current vortex die

Now should we continue with how stupid you're "pressure" point you made that kicked off this current vortex? Or do you want to let it die, you seem to have run out of steam on it
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,904
Liked Posts:
41,693
I said I'm not going to go for your attempted change of subject and I'm not. You want to know about Jones VS Fields is a classic vortex attempt because you look like a fucking idiot with bringing up the "Pressure" argument

You realized how stupid you look but there is also something wrong with you where you can't admit you're wrong or walk away, it's sad really.

So when I said I'm only dealing with one vortex at a time that's not a lie, me posting to make fun of you is not engaging in a second vortex, it's just making fun of you

That's always an option, so you want to debate anything else other then me making fun of you, you're going to have to let this current vortex die

Now should we continue with how stupid you're "pressure" point you made that kicked off this current vortex? Or do you want to let it die, you seem to have run out of steam on it

l-intro-1604420262.jpgl-intro-1604420262.jpg
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,370
Liked Posts:
9,766
I said I'm not going to go for your attempted change of subject and I'm not. You want to know about Jones VS Fields is a classic vortex attempt because you look like a fucking idiot with bringing up the "Pressure" argument

You realized how stupid you look but there is also something wrong with you where you can't admit you're wrong or walk away, it's sad really.

So when I said I'm only dealing with one vortex at a time that's not a lie, me posting to make fun of you is not engaging in a second vortex, it's just making fun of you

That's always an option, so you want to debate anything else other then me making fun of you, you're going to have to let this current vortex die

Now should we continue with how stupid you're "pressure" point you made that kicked off this current vortex? Or do you want to let it die, you seem to have run out of steam on it
hey man. your attempts at defeating the vortex have failed. you've been doing this for like 4 days now. you sleep less than Ryan Pace.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,220
Liked Posts:
2,606
hey man. your attempts at defeating the vortex have failed. you've been doing this for like 4 days now. you sleep less than Ryan Pace.
Not really his vortex is a pathetic display at this point. His last real vortex post was days ago.
 

Top