- Joined:
- Aug 17, 2011
- Posts:
- 43,364
- Liked Posts:
- 23,604
- Location:
- Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
Actually works for me. Dalton is good enough for the coaches to figure out what the O needs to correct before Fields' arrival and also help him see how to address coverages before facing them in live play.ARGH!!!!! In a weird way, the situation with Fields - despite being a much better situation - is infinitely more frustrating than the Mitch situation.
Obviously, based solely on college careers, Fields > Mitch. Obviously, based on professional careers, Dalton > Glennon. Both Mitch and Fields were/are shiny new toys that you want to get out of the package and start seeing being played. The major difference here is that Fields is probably infinitely more developed at this point than Mitch, and Fields seems (at least to me) infinitely more intelligent than Mitch. So you can feel confident in Fields "getting it" and being the guy we think he will be, BUT, Dalton is not going to be a flat out embarrassment like Glennon.
So, I repeat: ARGH!!!!!
I have never been a Dalton fan but understand he's a genuine experienced pro that won't need the sort of offensive tailoring that Foles and Mitch did. It's not like the O will be drastically held back or need a radical switch in emphasis when the switch is made.
Last edited: