Sorry that my posting was somehow unclear to you. As I have already told you, I can't really respond to the ' fact' that the defense improved from a 58.34 to a 133.31, because I'm not sure what those numbers are measuring. I agree that 133 is larger than 58. And, again, Pagano spent 1 year as the DC. If you can't understand the concept of the current Bears DC has 1 year of DC experience from 9 years ago on his resume, then I can't really explain it better.
You did a fine job showing the Ravens pass defense improved under Pagano. Perhaps the upgrades at 3 secondary positions helped, too. But I'm not knocking Pagano's time in Baltimore...just saying it wasn't very long.
I really don't know what is going on here...perhaps I am overlooking something terribly obvious? I found this to be helpful:
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/PagaCh0.htm
I don't understand your point with any of this. Pagano's production doesn't speak for itself. Not sure how that is even a question.