discplayer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 30, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,305
- Liked Posts:
- 689
- Location:
- Atlanta
Who struggles with his insistence (stop saying it's by design, for Pete's sake) on playing 8 - 10 yards off his man? Washington has and will continue to take advantage of that. If not for the illegal shift on DC on Kyle's not being in the same zip code as his man, Skins would have had a huge gain.
Yeah, he got the pick later, but teams (esp the good, well-coached ones, like the Eagles last year in playoffs) will take advantage of him. My main concern is that others do dirty work while he sits back in coverage allowing any/everything in front of him.
Seriously, if he's not comfortable with press man, why can't he play 4, 5, maybe even 7 yards off? What is the reason for allowing such a massive cushion in front of him? I always hated that in Lovie's cover 2 scheme but teams since then are more like GB and Rodgers, and will be more apt to take advantage of him. Why can't/don't coaches work with him, and demand tighter off-man coverage? Why is Fuller's off man SO far off?!
Yeah, he got the pick later, but teams (esp the good, well-coached ones, like the Eagles last year in playoffs) will take advantage of him. My main concern is that others do dirty work while he sits back in coverage allowing any/everything in front of him.
Seriously, if he's not comfortable with press man, why can't he play 4, 5, maybe even 7 yards off? What is the reason for allowing such a massive cushion in front of him? I always hated that in Lovie's cover 2 scheme but teams since then are more like GB and Rodgers, and will be more apt to take advantage of him. Why can't/don't coaches work with him, and demand tighter off-man coverage? Why is Fuller's off man SO far off?!