Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm

[step]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

The ustream link was buffering too much for my liking, try this if it's happening to you.
http://www.freedocast.com/KidBball

 

[??? ??????]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Rondo threw him into the scorers table. Rondo should be thrown out of the game for that. They threw Nocioni out for throwing Wade into the crowd a few years ago.

I wish the ref wasn't there so Hinrich couldn't have beaten him up.

 

[Shakes]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

They're tossing Rondo?

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

They better do something to Rondo after his trip on Hinrich that sent him out of the game, the "non flagrant" flagrant foul on miller, and now he just grabbed Hinrich as he threw him into the stands.

Rondo is DAMN lucky they didn't upgrade his other foul.

 

[theCHI_Life84]

u go kirk

 

[Shakes]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

LOL the Rondo sucks chant.

 

[step]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Love the chant.

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Shakes wrote:

They're tossing Rondo?

They're reviewing it. Doesn't look good given that VDN is arguing with them after they talked.

 

[step]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Bleh flagrant 1

 

[theCHI_Life84]

that mfer got a LUCKY ass call. this horse shit. he should be kicked off the floor for that shit

 

[Shakes]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Damn they let him stay.

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Yep, only a flagrant 1.

Probably the right call, but I think the league should consider suspending him given his cumulative aggression in this series.

 

[engies]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

dougthonus wrote:

Yep, only a flagrant 1.

Probably the right call, but I think the league should consider suspending him given his cumulative aggression in this series.

will they though

the whole reason they didnt throw him out is coz they know if his out it costs em money and a boston win

its a conspiracy i tell ya!

 

[TheStig]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

Thats crap, Rondo throws kirk into the stands and gets to stay in. Two dirty plays so quickly, Gray needs to elbow him in the head on a drive, Rondo has a bulls eye on his head.

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

16 fouls in the 1st quarter so far with the chance for more.

 

[Shakes]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

The way this game is being called I think taking the under on the FTs was the wrong choice ...

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

11 point 1st quarter lead.

Can't complain about that, though we had an 11 point 4th quarter lead on Tuesday that didn't hold up.

 

[??? ??????]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

dougthonus wrote:

Yep, only a flagrant 1.

Probably the right call, but I think the league should consider suspending him given his cumulative aggression in this series.

Agreed. They should send the NBA news reports of their cumulative suspension on Nocioni, and the cumulative suspension on Posey, which I believe was in the playoffs. And of course, that was their reasoning for suspending Ron Artest for the rest of the season, because of past transgressions.

 

[TheStig]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

dougthonus wrote:

Yep, only a flagrant 1.

Probably the right call, but I think the league should consider suspending him given his cumulative aggression in this series.

Bull, you can't throw people into the stands, thats a dirty play, he threw him purposefully in the end, he better get suspended or we throw him at KG in game 7. But good for kirk getting in his face, I can live with that technically.

 

[dougthonus]

Re:Game # 6: Celtics @ Bulls - TNT 04/30 6pm or 8:

engies wrote:

dougthonus wrote:

Yep, only a flagrant 1.

Probably the right call, but I think the league should consider suspending him given his cumulative aggression in this series.

will they though

the whole reason they didnt throw him out is coz they know if his out it costs em money and a boston win

its a conspiracy i tell ya!

No, there's no way they will throw him out, because they would then be acknowledging that the first play which they just called clean was actually flagrant.

They should consider it, but they won't.

I don't think it's about ratings. I think Chicago is as big a draw as Boston. They're better off for their future marketing Derrick Rose than the Celtics as well.