- Joined:
- May 31, 2010
- Posts:
- 7,003
- Liked Posts:
- 4,076
No surprises tonight.
Yeah.Well, they hung in there for two periods. 21 or so shots on net won't cut it.
Why? We expect this.Embarrassed
Right and this was against Calgary too. They are the best team in the NHL right now, literally. Even though they lost, I consider this a big bounce-back effort after the debacle against Edmonton two games ago, against a similar top-tier team. It was a great answer to the Edmonton loss, whereas in the past, you knew this game would be just another blowout for a fragile team. Of course, this doesn't mean all is well, but it was encouraging to see last night that the Hawks responded in a positive way from the Edmonton game; they didn't just fold like they normally would -- and yes, I do think that has a lot to do with who is currently behind the bench (i.e. not Colliton).I saw a much better and "together" team than in any game with the failed & confused guy behind the bench,
So far, King has brought some legit improvements.
They looked far better than in any game before confusiton and li'l stanley blowme were there.
I looked at it as 3-2 because I don't much count the empty netters as legit although they count.
What I am way more concerned is figuring out how to get e ass pee n + without a neurophone, AKA iphone.
I want to 'scribe and there is NO live support there.
Things do seem to be moving forward as opposed to backsliding under that "other guy".Right and this was against Calgary too. They are the best team in the NHL right now, literally. Even though they lost, I consider this a big bounce-back effort after the debacle against Edmonton two games ago, against a similar top-tier team. It was a great answer to the Edmonton loss, whereas in the past, you knew this game would be just another blowout for a fragile team. Of course, this doesn't mean all is well, but it was encouraging to see last night that the Hawks responded in a positive way from the Edmonton game; they didn't just fold like they normally would -- and yes, I do think that has a lot to do with who is currently behind the bench (i.e. not Colliton).
Yes, experience goes a long way, especially with regard to how a coach is perceived/respected in the locker room.Things do seem to be moving forward as opposed to backsliding under that "other guy".
I think a lot of the attitude change is due to respecting King as a PLAYER who had a good NHL career as opposed to "some guy".
We do. But completely out played is another thing. This is what, the fifth game in a row where the other team was on another level. This had nothing to do with Calgary. They were winning either way. It’s the fact this team has only one line worthy of playing the in the NHL and a defense outside of one person that doesn’t belong in the nhl.Why? We expect this.
I think this team is more average than good or bad. Collitin made them 0-9.
.400-.500 the rest of the way would not surprise or dusapoint me.
Always nice to beat the Blues, but the team still has a long way to go. Good win overall.Big win.
Start handling the teams in the division and we can think about dreaming.
I did like the way Kubakik had more open ice chances with Dach winning pucks and Cat is great on the counter attack as well.
Cat might be overkill for that line, and you could try a faceoff man with Dach/Kubalik against some teams.
Dude I'm watching the recap and seeing the Toews goal taken because "did 88 have control" crossing the blue line?Nice to see Lanks get a win.