- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,887
- Liked Posts:
- 2,109
- Location:
- Atlanta
well this isn't Tru's rookie year
Where does his post mention it is Trubiskys rookie season?
well this isn't Tru's rookie year
Cutler’s rate+ was anywhere from 92-104 with the Bears, excluding his five games in 2016 with a rate+ of 85. His passer rating was right around the league average, but the league is filled with backups, rookies, journeymen, and players on their last leg any given season,so most long term starters are 105 or better, something Cutler never did once. So Cutler was about average when considering starters, backups, rookies, etc... but towards the bottom for starters when he was on the field. When we also consider his injury issues, which were among the worst for all starting QBs, Cutler was probably the worst long term starter in the modern NFL beyond Bradford.
They already are, even though it would have meant starting Glennon all of last season and then somehow getting to pick ahead of the 0-16 Browns.My guess is Baker Mayfield.
Cant wait till bears fans say we should have drafted him.
Goff looked terrible his rookie year:
54.6 completion percentage
5 TDs
7 Ints
63.6 QB rating
Apparently it's hard for some people to understand, but a lot of young QBs are very bad early in their careers and wind up being excellent players.
Last night I finally understood why the Rams took him #1 overall. That throw he made to Kupp in the corner of the endzone, on the run is a throw most QBs can only dream of making. Mitch included. He'll NEVER make that throw. Mahomes on the other hand...he can make that throw all day.
You mean that shit throw that 2 defenders let go right by them? Any QB can make that simple throw.
You mean that shit throw that 2 defenders let go right by them? Any QB can make that simple throw.
Agree with this. To me, the 'tipping point' with the didshereallysaythat Cutler fanbase narrative was in 2013. Up to that point, the rationalization was always "Cutler needs more weapons around him". The 2013 Bears offense was almost historically unprecedented in that they almost had a 1300-yard rusher in Forte, and two 1300-yard WRs in Marshall and Jeffery (Marshall had 1421 yards, Jeffery fell short at 1295)...they also had Martellus Bennett at TE having his only (in retrospect) good season.
With all these weapons, Cutler's Rate+ was a middling 103 (teammate Josh McCown's was 129) and his W-L record was a middling 5-6. If ever a QB in NFL history has proven to be mediocre beyond a shadow of a doubt, it was Jay Cutler.
Ya Troy has more eyeballs then the rest of us. I'll go with what he said because the talking heads are always right and fans are always wrong.
I thought Mahomes was this playerGive it a few days and then the next “greatest” player in the NFL will probably emerge.
But is he the worst prolonged starting QB in the modern era? That would be the real question.
Goff is certainly looking like a baller, but let's slow our roll here calling him the best OP. It's important to remember you were one of Cutler's biggest nut garglers here, so your QB evaluation skills aren't quite up to par with the average poster on CCS, which is a bar set pretty darn low.
I especially like this quote here. Original statement was "my argument for Cutler was that he was an average QB" (lie) which then eventually leads into this post "if he wasn't average league wide" ....... ? League wide? What else are we averaging here?Let me ask you.. who after Kramer in 95 had a better statistical year than what Cutler averaged out to on the Bears? If he wasn't average league wide, then whatever, that's even worse. It's about time the Bears get a QB decision right!