pinkizdead
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,692
- Liked Posts:
- 131
- Location:
- south loop
i was havinga conversation with my friend yesterday over who the bulls should choose in 2010.
he was suprised to learn that i would rather have ben gordon then dwayne wade. i know it sounds crazy...but i would. here my reasons.
ben gordon is a great clutch player. he can hit HUGE! shots. like wierdly crazy insanely difficult shots. i love him. Wade is very very good as well.(better than gordon)
heres the thing. gordon is plus 200 pounds. he's a small guy, but he's a strong small guy. Wade is about 6'4. Neither are really your typical shooting gaurd. they're undersized.
Wade is a pretty consistent player. he can get to the basket at will, he gets alot of foul calls, and he can carry a team.
Gordon isn't a super star. i grant that. i dont think he ever will be a superstar, but he is a good player. He has problems dribbling, and he isn't awesome at defense. However gordon does have heart. i'll give him that.
Here are the issues that conscerned me the most. Gordon is a great shooter. he can spread the floor and he compliments rose well. Both rose and wade like to drive and kick. Wade is a decent outside shooter, but he can't hit them consitently. Gordon has a better ability to play with derek rose.
Gordon is a young player. he's never really had too many health issues. Wade's style of play might not be suited for his body. He get's injured alot(not this year...) But do i really want to pay a guy that might not be able to stay health all year long? is that my star? my go to guy? Furthermore isn't wade getting up there in the years? 28? next year he'll be 29? Do you want a 30 year old star that might be prone to injury?
Wade likes to be the primary ball handler in tough sitatuions. Will a wade rose duo work? Who would be the primary ballhandler? can Rose effectivly play off the ball?
Rose hasn't proven to be an effective shooter from beyond the arc. Neither has Wade. Who's going to spread the floor/open up the lane?
Gordon might be willing to take 8-12 million dollars over the next couple years. Wade wont... he'll probally want a max offer. I think he probally will get it too.
If we saved some cash by signing Gordon, i think we'd be a better team. AFter kirk leaves this year(hopefully it shall be him instead of gordon), i'd be more than willing to sign a defensive two guard who could drive it to the lane. It would be nice to have Rose and gordon starting. If the shots aren't falling, rest gordon and let some guy play defense as well as try to get some easy shots.
Any thoughts?
he was suprised to learn that i would rather have ben gordon then dwayne wade. i know it sounds crazy...but i would. here my reasons.
ben gordon is a great clutch player. he can hit HUGE! shots. like wierdly crazy insanely difficult shots. i love him. Wade is very very good as well.(better than gordon)
heres the thing. gordon is plus 200 pounds. he's a small guy, but he's a strong small guy. Wade is about 6'4. Neither are really your typical shooting gaurd. they're undersized.
Wade is a pretty consistent player. he can get to the basket at will, he gets alot of foul calls, and he can carry a team.
Gordon isn't a super star. i grant that. i dont think he ever will be a superstar, but he is a good player. He has problems dribbling, and he isn't awesome at defense. However gordon does have heart. i'll give him that.
Here are the issues that conscerned me the most. Gordon is a great shooter. he can spread the floor and he compliments rose well. Both rose and wade like to drive and kick. Wade is a decent outside shooter, but he can't hit them consitently. Gordon has a better ability to play with derek rose.
Gordon is a young player. he's never really had too many health issues. Wade's style of play might not be suited for his body. He get's injured alot(not this year...) But do i really want to pay a guy that might not be able to stay health all year long? is that my star? my go to guy? Furthermore isn't wade getting up there in the years? 28? next year he'll be 29? Do you want a 30 year old star that might be prone to injury?
Wade likes to be the primary ball handler in tough sitatuions. Will a wade rose duo work? Who would be the primary ballhandler? can Rose effectivly play off the ball?
Rose hasn't proven to be an effective shooter from beyond the arc. Neither has Wade. Who's going to spread the floor/open up the lane?
Gordon might be willing to take 8-12 million dollars over the next couple years. Wade wont... he'll probally want a max offer. I think he probally will get it too.
If we saved some cash by signing Gordon, i think we'd be a better team. AFter kirk leaves this year(hopefully it shall be him instead of gordon), i'd be more than willing to sign a defensive two guard who could drive it to the lane. It would be nice to have Rose and gordon starting. If the shots aren't falling, rest gordon and let some guy play defense as well as try to get some easy shots.
Any thoughts?