- Joined:
- Aug 17, 2011
- Posts:
- 41,665
- Liked Posts:
- 23,990
- Location:
- Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
When you go to the grocery store with $20, do you buy a couple fillets without sides to feed your family or the makings for a great stew and after dinner treat for the kids? How does the family grade those meals? Which fills those holes in their stomachs in a more satisfying manner?Grading system
A - Pro Bowl level player
B - Good starter
C - Average player
D - Below average player
F - Terrible player
Mike Davis C+ He is cheap but I think his upside is no better than being a good player but more likely IMO being an average player hence the C+ .That is still useful as you can't be stacked with good players everywhere but nothing to write home about.
Buster Skrine C- Think his upside is really just as an average player but also have the potential in my view to be a below average player. I gave him a C- rather than a D+ as I think he is a bit more likely to just be average than below average.
Cordarelle Patterson C Kickoff Return guys are an increasingly dying breed with all the rule changes but I gave him a C because I think he has the ability to be an average player on offense particularly if he gets more snaps as a RB as opposed to a WR.
Ted Larsen D Below average player that will always be a below average player.
Ha Ha Clinton Dix B- Good player who signed for a good price. Gave him a B- because there is a slight risk that he ends up just being average (don't think there is much risk in him being bad) and because it is a one year deal so if he is good then he likely walks next year as unlikely to give him big money and Jackson bigger money. So not a lot of long term value.
I'm not going to argue this with you because I believe this post is intentionally controversial to create 10 pages of a Remy spiral.