Chicago4Life
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,509
- Liked Posts:
- 1,953
They would need to trade for Rodgers so they could attach a big money guy if the Packers would be up for it. Sutton would be a solid consolation prize for losing Adams. Besides, if the Denver is looking to pull this off, they're only concerned with the next 2 years really anyway.Broncos are clearly hoping for Rodgers with this, although Hackett is a solid coach imo.
Would be tough for DEN to sign Adams, imo, they just gave eight figure per year deals to Sutton and Patrick, and they also have Jeudy and Fant (plus Hamler although he looks like a bust). Probably want to put their $ elsewhere like into OL.
Packers aren't going to want a big money guy, they are going to want picks. Even if they trade Rodgers they are $25mil over the cap.They would need to trade for Rodgers so they could attach a big money guy if the Packers would be up for it. Sutton would be a solid consolation prize for losing Adams. Besides, if the Denver is looking to pull this off, they're only concerned with the next 2 years really anyway.
if they trade rodgers they will go into a rebuild meaning they will cut guys like cobb, smith, amos etc...they can take on a sutton/patrick along with jeudy and picks...the packers have no WR's so they will need a sutton/patrick along with jeudy and draft picks to replenish that group for love or whoever their starting qb ends up being.Packers aren't going to want a big money guy, they are going to want picks. Even if they trade Rodgers they are $25mil over the cap.
Why would they take on a guy like Patrick, for example, who only has a three year deal if they are going into rebuild?if they trade rodgers they will go into a rebuild meaning they will cut guys like cobb, smith, amos etc...they can take on a sutton/patrick along with jeudy and picks...the packers have no WR's so they will need a sutton/patrick along with jeudy and draft picks to replenish that group for love or whoever their starting qb ends up being.
Rodgers would be a fool to go to that division.Broncos are clearly hoping for Rodgers with this, although Hackett is a solid coach imo.
Would be tough for DEN to sign Adams, imo, they just gave eight figure per year deals to Sutton and Patrick, and they also have Jeudy and Fant (plus Hamler although he looks like a bust). Probably want to put their $ elsewhere like into OL.
Yea I think they'd want to cut salary as much as possible as well.Packers aren't going to want a big money guy, they are going to want picks. Even if they trade Rodgers they are $25mil over the cap.
Edit: maybe Jeudy who is on a rookie deal?
I doubt Aaron Rodgers is scared of going to a division.Rodgers would be a fool to go to that division.
Yeah I don't see the packers rebuilding. That's not their MO and they have a roster built to win now. They'll push money into the future. I don't think Rodgers is leaving eitherWhy would they take on a guy like Patrick, for example, who only has a three year deal if they are going into rebuild?
They will want to cleat cap space. If they traded Rodgers and cut all their high priced vets - that's both Smiths, Cobb, and Amos - they would have about $16mil in cap space. They will need probably at least $6-8mil for rookies and they probably have players they want to resign, maybe Tonyan, Campbell, Douglas.
Just seems like a strange fit. Certainly could see Jeudy.
They've never had to because they've gotten lucky with QBs and have dealt with the cap well, until this current regime.Yeah I don't see the packers rebuilding. That's not their MO and they have a roster built to win now. They'll push money into the future. I don't think Rodgers is leaving either
I think Adams will get taggedBroncos are clearly hoping for Rodgers with this, although Hackett is a solid coach imo.
Would be tough for DEN to sign Adams, imo, they just gave eight figure per year deals to Sutton and Patrick, and they also have Jeudy and Fant (plus Hamler although he looks like a bust). Probably want to put their $ elsewhere like into OL.
I dont think you can get three 1sts for a 38 yr old QB. One 1st and maybe a 3rd or 2nd round pick IMO.I just don't see how the Packers can pass on 3 first round picks plus players on their rookie deal if the Broncos offered it. Plus they would get an opportunity to see what they have in Love. Yeah he has sucked so far but lots of QBs suck until they get a year under their belt. If you don't play Love, you basically wasted a 1st round pick without playing them. Even if Love does suck, you would have so much ammo to draft another QB high with a lot of young talent.
Pushing the Packers to $65mil over the cap.I think Adams will get tagged